Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
News consumption repertoires among Finnish adolescents: Moderate digital traditionalists, minimalist social media stumblers, and frequent omnivores Cover

News consumption repertoires among Finnish adolescents: Moderate digital traditionalists, minimalist social media stumblers, and frequent omnivores

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptive statistics of following news from different source options

IndicatorsMean*Variance**N***
Television3.5041.623782
Newspapers (print)2.7701.763782
Newspapers (digital/Internet)4.0631.509782
Shared news on social media3.3851.811775

* Scale 1–6: Never/Couple of times a year/Couple of times a month/Couple of times a week/Daily/Many times a day

** To get standard deviation use the formula: Standard Deviation = √ Variance

*** Max N in study = 782

Table 2

Descriptive statistics of independent variables

CovariatesMean*Variance**N***
Gender (0/1; Women/Men)0.4940.250782
Age (in years)16.9941.986782
At school (0/1; No/Yes)0.8750.110782
Living in Uusimaa/Capital area (0/1; No/Yes)0.2130.168780
Economic situation of family (1–5; Very Bad–Very Good)3.8670.578782
Political activity last 12 months on some platform of social media (0/1; No/Yes)0.7710.177782
Trust in traditional media sources (1–5; Not at all–Very much)4.1800.590782
Trust in shared news on social media (1–5; Not at all–Very much)2.7740.619779
Seek information daily on social media (0/1; No/Yes)0.7070.207782

* Mean in the case of dichotomous variable (0/1) gives proportion how much is answered to option one at the variable

** To get standard deviation use the formula: Standard Deviation = √ Variance

*** Max N in study = 782

Table 3

Profile comparison

ProfileLoglikelihoodAICBICABICCAICEntropyLMRBLRT
1−5203.16310424.32510466.28210437.70210475.283
2−5056.23410150.46910239.04410178.70910258.0430.7080.08370.0000
3−5005.10510068.20910203.40310111.31410232.4040.6610.01840.0000
4−4971.12610020.25210202.06410078.22010241.0640.616*0.00070.0000

* Classification probability 0.53 in the first profile

Figure 1

Elbow plot showcasing information criteria changes and gain of information when additional profiles are included in the analysis

Table 4

Selected model's means, variances, and residual covariances

Profile 1Profile 2Profile 3
Minimalist social media stumblersModerate digital traditionalistsFrequent news omnivores
TelevisionMean = 2.677Mean = 3.616Mean = 4.489
Variance = 1.710Variance = 1.269Variance = 0.600
Newspapers (print)Mean = 1.312Mean = 3.119Mean = 3.957
Variance = 0.218Variance =1.268Variance = 0.734
Newspapers (digital/Internet)Mean = 3.478Mean = 4.067Mean = 5.033
Variance = 1.963Variance = 1.198Variance = 0.357
Shared news on social mediaMean = 3.206Mean = 3.141Mean = 4.574
Variance = 1.846Variance = 1.703Variance = 0.457
Residual covariance news sites and shared news social media0.636 (p = 0.013)0.056 (p = 0.593)0.130 (p = 0.070)
N214 (27%)439 (56%)129 (16%)

[i] Comments: All means and variances are significant at the 0.05 level.

Figure 2

Selected model and profiles indicating news repertoires

Table 5

Prediction of news repertoires (multinomial logistic)

RepertoireVariableCoef.*P-value
Moderate digital traditionalists (Ref. minimalist social media stumblers)Gender (Ref. women)0.7910.010
Age0.1720.121
At school (Ref. no)0.7880.079
Living Uusimaa/Capital area (Ref. no)−0.7580.014
Economic situation family0.0150.937
Political activity on social media in last 12 months (Ref. no)0.8120.009
Trust traditional media0.5920.002
Trust news social media−0.2140.266
Seek information daily social media (Ref. no)−0.0380.903
Frequent news omnivores (Ref. minimalist social media stumblers)Gender (Ref. women)1.0940.001
Age0.2320.052
At school (Ref. no)0.8690.117
Living Uusimaa/Capital area (Ref. no)−0.8650.040
Economic situation family0.0810.721
Political activity on social media in last 12 months (Ref. no)0.7640.043
Trust traditional media0.5140.022
Trust news social media0.2100.343
Seek information daily social media (Ref. no)1.6590.008

* To change a reference category with dichotomous variables to the opposite, it suffices to change the sign of the coefficient to the opposite in the interpretation.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 234 - 253
Published on: Dec 10, 2022
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Niina Sormanen, Eero Rantala, Markku Lonkila, Terhi-Anna Wilska, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.