Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Is news engagement worthwhile?: Studying young audiences’ engagement with YouTuber-like news content Cover

Is news engagement worthwhile?: Studying young audiences’ engagement with YouTuber-like news content

Open Access
|Aug 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptions of Schrøder's worthwhileness categories

CategoryDescription
Time spentA medium must be worth the time spent, and the news media that are experienced as more important are more worthwhile; others are used temporarily at a convenient time (e.g., mobile moments).
Public connectionThis helps maintain relations to one's networks and the wider society. Schrøder divides public connection into “democratic worthwhileness” (content that caters to one's identity) and “everyday worthwhileness” (content that links one with their personal networks).
Normative pressuresUsage or non-usage of a medium depends on how significant others find the medium.
Participatory potentialParticipation through (inter)activity, sharing, liking, and creating content can be meaningful for some people.
PriceThe news medium must be affordable and worth the price.
Technological appealThe technological features and technical quality potential of the device or medium.
Situational fitThe suitability of the time and place for using the medium.

[i] Comments: The worthwhileness categories are explained and described based on Schrøder's (2015) outline.

Table 2

YouTubers’ techniques used in the focus group videos

VideoGenre, format, and affordancesAudio/visual codesTextual and linguistic expressions
DEAL or NO DEAL: Brits and EU divorcing the marriage (explains Brexit from the aspect of possible personal impact to the young viewer)
Length: 2′33′
Genre: news + original performance
Format: sit-down
Affordances: time spent, democratic and everyday worthwhileness, technological appeal, news-ness
Sound effects, background music
Numerous memes and pictures, and the written text emphasises the news facts
Editing: jump-cuts to accelerate the pace of presentation, no post-production effects
High technical quality
Explaining to the camera
Listing of news-related facts
Narrative elements: action, resolution, coda
Uses slang, includes few vulgar expressions
Fast speech rate
THE FUTURE IS NOW: robots writing business news
(about using robots in journalism; similar to conventional infotainment news interview)
Length: 6′44″
Genre: original performance + news
Format: sketch + collab
Affordances: time spent, technological appeal, news-ness
Modest sound effects, ambient background music
Video footage from newscasts
Simultaneous unrelated action in the background
Editing: similar to journalistic feature news, no post-production effects
Remarkably low technical quality
News interview
Narrative elements: abstract, orientation, resolution, coda
Everyday word use, similar to formal news texts
Speech rate similar to ordinary conversation
ONLY IN 5 MINUTES: stock market explained in kitchen
(rises and falls of investing in stock market explained using cooking metaphors)
Length: 4′49″
Genre: original performance + how-to
Format: sit-down
Affordances: everyday worthwhileness
Modest sound effects, background music
Few gifs, written punch lines, bloopers
Editing: few jumpcuts to emphasise important facts
Normal technical quality with minor flaws in sound and lighting
Explaining to the camera
Listed facts presented through acting
Narrative elements: abstract, resolution, coda
Everyday language
Slow speech rate
BE AWARE: how you can prevent the financial crisis from happening?
(explaining principles of financial behaviour in an acted sketch)
Length: 2′57″
Genre: news + original performance
Format: sketch + sit-down
Affordances: time spent, democratic and everyday worthwhileness, technological appeal
Sound effects to emphasise the facts or jokes, ambient background music
Gifs, short video additions, written punch lines
Editing: a number of jump cuts to emphasise important facts
High technical quality
Explaining to the camera using short sentences, jokes, punch lines
Narrative elements: action, resolution, coda
Everyday language Fast speech rate

[i] Comments: All ten videos were created and published weekly on Äripäev's news portal (www.aripaev.ee/t/richify) and YouTube channel (see Äripäev, 2019a; 2019b; 2019c; 2019d) from January to March 2019. The videos used in this study were all published in January. Focus group interviews were conducted from April to June 2019. The headlines were originally in Estonian and were translated for this article.

Table 3

Overview of focus groups

GroupDuration (min.)Number of participantsAgeFemaleMale
165616–1742
270717–1807
345515–1650
468716–1752
5751216–18102

[i] Comments: All participants of the focus groups were recruited from municipal schools in Estonia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2022-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 152 - 170
Published on: Aug 31, 2022
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Marju Himma-Kadakas, Raul Ferrer-Conill, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.