Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The space of media usage in Finland, 2007 and 2018 Cover

The space of media usage in Finland, 2007 and 2018

Nordicom Review
Volume 42 (2021): Issue s3 (April 2021)
By: Semi Purhonen,  Adrian Leguina and  Riie Heikkilä  
Open Access
|Apr 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The space of media usage in Finland in 2007 (41 modalities), axes 1 and 2Comments: Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.
The space of media usage in Finland in 2007 (41 modalities), axes 1 and 2Comments: Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.

Figure 2

Sociodemographic variables and variables measuring party support and political attitudes (conservative versus liberal) in the Finnish space of media usage, 2007Comments: Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.
Sociodemographic variables and variables measuring party support and political attitudes (conservative versus liberal) in the Finnish space of media usage, 2007Comments: Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.

Figure 3

Individuals in the space of media usage, 2007 and 2018Comments: Left: 2007 individuals (active); right: 2018 individuals (supplementary).
Individuals in the space of media usage, 2007 and 2018Comments: Left: 2007 individuals (active); right: 2018 individuals (supplementary).

Figure 4

The space of media usage in Finland in 2018, axes 1 and 2Comments: 74 modalities, including 33 new modalities of Internet and social media. Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.
The space of media usage in Finland in 2018, axes 1 and 2Comments: 74 modalities, including 33 new modalities of Internet and social media. Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.

Figure 5

Sociodemographic variables and variables measuring party support and political attitudes (conservative versus liberal) in the Finnish space of media usage, 2018Comments: Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.
Sociodemographic variables and variables measuring party support and political attitudes (conservative versus liberal) in the Finnish space of media usage, 2018Comments: Shape size is proportional to their frequency in the sample.

Variances of axes, explained variances, and modified rates in constructing the space of media usage in Finland, 2007

AxisVariance% of explained varianceBenzécri's modified rates (%)
1.20417.677.1
2.12711.019.2
3.0806.93.0
4.0625.30.4
5.0585.00.2

Variances of axes, explained variances, and modified rates in constructing the space of media usage in Finland, 2018

AxisVariance% of explained varianceBenzécri's modified rates (%)
1.16314.679.0
2.0776.910.3
3.0625.65.0
4.0544.83.0
5.0484.31.8

Individuals’ mean and variance on axes 1 and 2, 2007 and 2018

20072018Comparison (F-test)
Axis 1 mean.000.228203.781 (p = .000)a
Axis 1 variance.204.15735.897 (p = .000)
Axis 2 mean.000−.0161.302 (p = .254)b
Axis 2 variance.127.124.004 (p = .949)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2021-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 128
Published on: Apr 7, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
media usage,
online activities,
stratification,
change,
multiple correspondence analysis
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Communication science,
Public and political communication,
Mass communication

© 2021 Semi Purhonen, Adrian Leguina, Riie Heikkilä, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 42 (2021): Issue s3 (April 2021)Next article