References
- Berry, J. M., & Sobieraj, S. (2013). The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Cameron, D., & Shaw, S. (2016). Gender, power and political speech: Women and language in the 2015 UK general election. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104 - Committee on Standards in Public Life. (2017, December). Intimidation in public life.
www.gov.uk/government/organisations/the-committee-on-standards-in-public-life - Curtis, G. N. (2004). Logical fallacy: The Hitler card. Fallacy files.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adnazium.html#Note1 - Duggan, M. (2014, October 22). Online harassment. Pew Research Centre.
https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/ - Earner-Byrne, L., & Urquhart, D. (2019). The Irish abortion journey, 2019–2018. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03855-7 - Glen, S. (2016). Phi coefficient (mean square contingency coefficient). Statistics how to.
https://www.statisticshowto.com/phi-coefficient-mean-square-contingency-coefficient/ - Goffman, E. (1982). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. New York: Pantheon Books.
- Hern, A. (2018, May 8). Facebook to block foreign spending on Irish abortion vote ads. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/08/facebook-to-block-foreign-spending-on-irish-abortion-vote-ads-referendum - Jamieson, K. H., Volinsky, A., Weitz, I., & Kenski, K. (2017). The political uses and abuses of civility and incivility. In K. Kenski, & Jamieson, K. H. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp.205–218). New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001 - Joyce, M. (2013). Picking the best intercoder reliability statistic for your digital activism content analysis.
http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses/edur9131/content/IntercoderReliabilityBlogPost.pdf - Kim, H., Jang, S. M., Kim, S. & Wan, A. (2018). Evaluating sampling methods for content analysis of Twitter data. Social Media + Society, 4(2), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118772836 - Krzyżanowski, M., & Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the web: Populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 566–581.
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17028.krz - Le, G. M., Radcliffe, K., Lyles, C., Lyson, H. C., Wallace, B., Sawaya, G., Pasick, R., Centola, D., & Sarkar, U. (2019). Perceptions of cervical cancer prevention on Twitter uncovered by different sampling strategies. PloS one, 14(2),
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211931 - Littman, J. (2018). Ireland 8th Tweet Ids. [dataset]. Harvard Dataverse.
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PYCLPE - Milner, R. M., & Phillips, W. (2018, November 20). The Internet doesn’t need civility, it needs ethics. Motherboard.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/pa5gxn/the-internet-doesnt-need-civility-it-needs-ethics - Muddiman, A. (2017). Personal and public levels of political incivility. International Journal of Communication, 11(21), 3182–3202.
https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6137/2106 - Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage.
- Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841 - Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New media & society, 6(2), 259–283.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444 - Rossini, P. (2019). Disentangling uncivil and intolerant discourse. In R. Boatright, D. Young, S. Sobieraj, & T. Shaffer (Eds), A crisis of civility? Contemporary research on civility, incivility, and political discourse (pp.142–157). New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351051989 - Roth, Y., & Harvey, D. (2018, June 26). How Twitter is fighting spam and malicious automation. Twitter blog official.
https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/company/2018/how-twitter-is-fighting-spam-and-malicious-automation.html - Rowe, I. (2015). Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 121–138.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365 - Ruzza, C. (2009). Populism and Euroscepticism: Towards uncivil society? Policy and Society, 28(1), 87–98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.02.007 - Stryker, R., Conway, B. A., & Danielson, J. T. (2016). What is political incivility? Communication Monographs, 83(4), 535–556.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207 - Sweeney, J. (2018, April 4). The role of social media in the eighth amendment referendum. Digital Training Institute.
https://digitaltraininginstitute.ie/role-of-social-media-eighth-amendment-referendum/ - Tait, A. (2016, August 15). Get in the sea: When is a death threat not a death threat? NewsStatesman.
https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/social-media/2016/08/get-sea-when-death-threat-not-death-threat - Tracy, K. (2008). “Reasonable hostility”: Situation-appropriate face-attack. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 4(2), 169–191.
https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.009 - Wojcik, S., & Hughes, A. (2019, April 24). Sizing up Twitter users. Pew Research Centre.
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/ - Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297556.001.0001 - Zerilli, L. (2014). Against civility: A feminist perspective. In A. Sarat (Ed). Civility, legality, and justice in America (pp. 107–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107479852
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 118
Published on: Mar 3, 2021
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2021 Dayei Oh, Suzanne Elayan, Martin Sykora, John Downey, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.