Issue Salience on Twitter During Swedish Party Leaders’ Debates
References
- Aizawa, A. (2003). An information-theoretic perspective of tf–idf measures. Information Processing & Management, 39(1): 45–65.
- Aylott, N. (2015) The party system. In J. Pierre (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Swedish politics (pp. 152–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Boynton, G. R. & Richardson Jr, G. W. (2016). Agenda setting in the twenty-first century. New Media & Society, 18(9): 1916–1934.
- Bruns, A. & Burgess, J. (2011). # ausvotes: How twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 37–56.
- Caiani, M & Parenti, L. (2013) European and American extreme right groups and the Internet Surrey: Ashgate.
- Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chadwick, A., O’Loughlin, B. & Vaccari, C. (2017). Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2): 220–239.
- Dijck, J. & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1): 2–14.
- Gibson, R. K. & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3): 529–547.
- Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8): 965–989.
- Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Jacobs, K. & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Johansson, B. (2017). Medievalrörelsen 2014. Invandringsfrågan i fokus för balanserad bevakning [The media election campaign 2014. The immigration issue in focus of balanced coverage]. In B. Johansson & L. Truedson (eds.), När makten står på spel: journalistik i valrörelser (pp. 22–57). Stockholm: Institutet för Mediestudier.
- Jungherr, A. (2014). The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication, 64, 239–259. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12087
- Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1): 72–91.
- Jungherr, A., Schoen, H. & Jürgens, P. (2015). The mediation of politics through Twitter: An analysis of messages posted during the campaign for the German federal election 2013. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12143
- Kalsnes, B., Krumsvik, A. H. & Storsul, T. (2014). Social media as a political backchannel: Twitter use during televised election debates in Norway. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3): 313–328.
- Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kitschelt, H. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Koc-Michalska, K., Gibson, R. & Vedel, T. (2014). Online campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political actors and citizens in the aftermath of the web.2.0 evolution Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11, 220–244.
- Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Larsson, A. O. & Moe, H. (2015). From emerging to established? A comparison of Twitter use during Swedish election campaigns in 2010 and 2014. In A. Bruns, G. Enli, E. Skogerbø, A.O. Larsson & C. Christensen (eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 311–324). London: Routledge.
- Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives New York: Free Press.
- McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion (2nd edn.). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2): 176–187.
- McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L. & Weaver, D. H., (2014). New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society, 17(6): 781–802.
- Martinsson, J. & Weissenbilder, M. (2018) Viktiga valfrågor i Sverige – från miljö till invandring [Important election issues in Sweden – from environment to immigration]. In U. Andersson, A. Carlander, E. Lindgren & M. Oskarson (eds.), Sprickor i fasaden (pp. 119–132 ). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg/The SOM institute.
- Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H. & Carley, K. M. (2013). Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehose. Retrieved from: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1306.5204M [accessed 2018, September 17].
- Obholzer, L. & Daniel, W. T. (2016). An online electoral connection? How electoral systems condition representatives’ social media use. European Union Politics, 17(3): 387–407.
- Park, S., Ko, M., Lee, J. & Song, J. (2013). Agenda diversity in social media discourse: A study of the 2012 Korean general election. In Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media Boston, Massachusetts, 8–11 July 2013. (pp. 486–495).
- Rabinowitz, G., Prothro, J. W. & Jacoby, W. (1982). Salience as a factor in the impact of issues on candidate evaluation. Journal of Politics, 44(1): 41–63.
- Rogstad, I. (2016). Is Twitter just rehashing? Intermedia agenda setting between Twitter and mainstream media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2): 142–158.
- Sandberg, L. & Bjereld, U. (2015). Politiskt deltagande och engagemang i en digital kontext [Political participation and engaement in a digital context]. In A. Bergström, B. Johansson, H. Oscarsson & M. Oskarson (eds.), Fragment (pp. 523–534 ). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg/The SOM institute.
- Trilling, D. (2015). Two different debates? Investigating the relationship between a political debate on TV and simultaneous comments on Twitter. Social Science Computer Review doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314537886
- Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A. & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6): 1041–1061.
- Vergeer, M. & Franses, P. H. (2016). Live audience responses to live televised election debates: Time series analysis of issue salience and party salience on audience behavior. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10): 1390–1410.
- Wlezien, C. (2005). On the salience of political issues: The problem with ‘most important problem’. Electoral Studies, 24(4), 555–579.
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 61
Published on: Oct 11, 2019
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2019 Linn A.C. Sandberg, Ulf Bjereld, Karina Bunyik, Markus Forsberg, Richard Johansson, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.