Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Issue Salience on Twitter During Swedish Party Leaders’ Debates Cover

Issue Salience on Twitter During Swedish Party Leaders’ Debates

Open Access
|Oct 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Coding of political issues discussed in the debates

Policy dimensionIssueTopics discussed
Left/rightEconomy and labour marketThe state’s economy and labour market (e.g. unemployment, budget deficit, taxes)
Left/rightSchoolEducational attainment, school performance, private schools and profits, class sizes, grades etc.
Left/rightHealthcareQueues, waiting times, reduced capacity, care for the elderly etc.
GAL/TANLaw and order; DefenceCrime, rape, crime prevention and penalties, safety policy, military capability, Ukraine, Russia, Swedish fighter planes, NATO
GAL/TANEnvironmentClimate change, CO2 emissions, renewable energy, UN negotiations
GAL/TANImmigration; Open bordersCommon asylum rules within the EU, refugee crisis, EU migration, begging, labour migration

[i] Comments: “Law and order” was a theme in one debate and “Defence” in the other, likewise “Immigration” and “Open borders”.

Figure 1

Total amount of tweets sent during the time of the debate

Comments: The figure shows all the tweets in our dataset sent between two hours before the debate and one hour after. The debates started at 8 pm (20:00) and ended at 10 pm (22:00), with a break between 9 pm (21:00) and 9.15 pm.

Figure 2

Timing and frequency of issue discussion on Twitter during the party leaders’ debates in October 2013 and May 2014

Comments: The upper panel shows data from the October 2013 debate and the lower panel data from the May 2014 debate.

Table 2

Issue discussions in the televised debate and frequency in tweets

Percentage of debating time spent discussing the issuePercentage of debate-related tweets mentioning the issueDifference between relative debating time and tweet volume
October 2013
Healthcare1412 (1,168)- 2
Labour market3136 (3,549)+5
Climate139 (939)-4
Refugees129 (933)-3
School1724 (2,437)+6
Crime149 (937)-5
Total100100 (10,023)
May 2014
Defence1510 (2,167)-5
Open borders1621 (4,416)+5
Labour market2835 (7,224)+7
School1620 (4,174)+4
Healthcare136 (1,296)-7
Climate127 (1,486)-5
Total100100 (20,763)

[i] Comments: The time devoted to each issue in the televised debates was measured manually and calculated as a percentage of the total time of the debate. The number of tweets mentioning issue-specific words was calculated and expressed as a percentage of all debate-related tweets, but it should be remembered that a tweet could address more than one issue. Pearson correlation coefficients for the relationship between relative time and relative volume were significant in both debates (October: R = .943, R2 = .8892; May: R = .9271 and R2 = .8595).

Table 3

Relative salience of political discussions grouped by policy dimension

Percentage of time devoted to policy dimension during the televised debatePercentage of debate-related tweets mentioning policy dimensionDifference between relative debating time and tweet volume
October 2013
GAL/TAN (climate; refugees; crime)3927-12
Left/Right (labour market; healthcare; school)6172+11
May 2014
GAL/TAN (climate; open borders; defence)4338-5
Left/Right (labour market; healthcare; school)5761+4

[i] Comments: The table shows the salience of the two dimensions (the GAL/TAN and the Left/Right dimension) in the televised debates and in tweets related to the debates.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0033 | Journal eISSN: 2001-5119 | Journal ISSN: 1403-1108
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 61
Published on: Oct 11, 2019
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Linn A.C. Sandberg, Ulf Bjereld, Karina Bunyik, Markus Forsberg, Richard Johansson, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.