A Room of One’s Own?: Using period trackers to escape menstrual stigma

Amanda Karlsson

doi:10.2478/nor-2019-0017

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

A Room of One’s Own?: Using period trackers to escape menstrual stigma

Nordicom Review

Volume 40 (2019): Issue s1 (June 2019)

By: Amanda Karlsson

Open Access

|Jun 2019

Abstract

This article’s ambition is to study the needs and motives embedded in the everyday usage of period trackers.

A period tracker is an app for smartphones to monitor the female cycle.

Based on twelve in-depth interviews with Danish women who use period trackers, I explore the connections among menstrual stigma and the usage of period trackers and investigate how digital traces from their datafied

By datafied body, I mean the representation of the fleshly, physical body created by tracked data.

bodies transmit meaning to their everyday life. The women in the study described how the app provides them with reassurance and privacy, and thus the article finds that 1) period apps are experienced as private, shame-free rooms for exploratory engagement with the menstruating body and 2) the risk of embodied data potentially becoming shareable commodities does not affect the everyday self-tracking practice of these women.

References

Beausang, C. C. & Razor, A. G. (2010). Young western women’s experiences of menarche and menstruation. Health Care For Women International, 6: 517–528.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beauvoir, S. de (1989). Det andet køn [The second sex]. København: Tiderne skifter.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 662–679.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bretschneider, R. A. (2015). A goal- and context-driven approach in mobile period tracking applications. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (eds.), Universal access in human–computer interaction. Access to learning, health and well-being. UAHCI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9177. Cham: Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent and lead. New York: Gotham Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chrisler, J. C. (2011). Leaks, lumps and lines: Stigma and women’s bodies. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(2): 202–214.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chrisler, J. C., Marván, M. L., Gormana, J. A. & Rossinia, M. (2014). Body appreciation and attitudes towards menstruation. Body Image, 12: 78–81.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Culnan, M. J. & Milne, G. R. (2001). The Culnan-Milne survey on consumers and online privacy notices: Summary of responses. Interagency public workshop: Getting noticed: Writing effective financial privacy notices, December 4. Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/glb/supporting/culnan-milne.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dean-Jones, L. (1989). Menstrual bleeding according to the Hippocratics and Aristotle. Transactions of the American Philosophical Association (1974-), 119: 177–191. John Hopkins University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Delaney, J., Lupton, M. J. & Toth, E. (1976). The curse: A cultural history of menstruation. 1st edition. New York: Dutton, cop.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dolezal, L. (2015). The body and shame: Phenomenology, feminism, and the socially shaped body. Lanham, MD.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Epstein, D., Lee, N. B., Kang, J. H., Agapie, E., Schroeder, J., Pina, L. R., Fogarty, J., Kientz, J. A. & Munson, S. A. (2017). Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. Retrieved from http://www.smunson.com/portfolio/projects/lifelogs/menstrualtracking_chi2017.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Floridi, L. (2015). The onlife manifesto – Being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer International Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fox, S. (2000). Trust and privacy online: Why Americans want to rewrite the rules. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2000/08/20/trust-and-privacy-online/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Penguin: London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gatrell, C. J. (2007). Secrets and lies: Breastfeeding and professional paid work. Social Science & Medicine 65: 393–404.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hanisch, C. (1970). The personal is political. In S. Firestone & A. Koedt (eds.), Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation: Major writings of the radical feminists (pp. 76–78). New York: Radical Feminism.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hann, I. H., Hui, K. L., Lee, T. S. Y. & Png, I. P. L. (2002). Online information privacy: Measuring the cost–benefit tradeoff. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on information systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2002, December 15–18 (pp. 1–10).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. L. (2007). Feminist research practice. Power in Knowledge. New York, Dordrecht: Sage Publications, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jensen, C., Potts, C. & Jensen, C. (2005). Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-report versus observed behavior. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63(1–2): 203–227.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnston-Robledo, I. & Chrisler, J. C. (2013). The menstrual mark: Menstruation as social stigma. Sex Roles, 1: 9–18.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnston-Robledo, I., Voigt, J., Sheffield, K. & Wilcox-Constantine, J. (2007). Reproductive shame: Self-objectification and women’s attitudes toward their reproductive functioning. Women & Health, 46(1): 25–39.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kasabova, A. (2017). From shame to shaming: Towards an analysis of shame narratives. Open Cultural Studies, 1: 99–112.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kitchin, R. & Lauriault, T. P. (2014). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80: 463–475.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kvale, S. (1994). Introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview [Introduction to the qualitative research interview]. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lindqvist, J. (2018). New challenges to personal data processing agreements: Is the GDPR fit to deal with contract, accountability and liability in a world of the Internet of Things? International Journal of Law and Information Technology.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lupton, D. (2014). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lupton, D. (2015). Digital sociology. NY: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self – A sociology of self-tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nafus, D. (2016). Quantified – Bio-sensing technologies in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nafus, D. & Neff, G. (2016). Self-tracking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nissenbaum, H. (2011). A contextual approach to privacy online. Daedalus, 140(4), Protecting the Internet as a Public Commons (Fall): 32–48.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Norgaard, K. M. (1999). Moon phases, menstrual cycles, and Mother Earth: The construction of a special relationship between women and nature. Ethics and the Environment, 4(2).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perz J. & Ussher, J.M. (2006). Women’s experience of premenstrual syndrome: A case of silencing the self. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 24(4): 289–303.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Phelps, J., Nowak, G. & Ferrell, E. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1): 27–41.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Phipps, W. E. (1980). The menstrual taboo in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Journal of Religion and Health, 19(4).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Richardson, J. (2011). The changing meaning of privacy, identity and contemporary feminist philosophy. Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Minds & Machines, 21: 517.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roberts, T.-A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self-objectification. 28(1): 22–26.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roberts, T., Goldenberg, J. L., Power, C. & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). Feminine protection: The effects of menstruation on attitudes towards women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26: 131–139.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schooler, D. et al. (2005). Cycles of shame: Menstrual shame, body shame, and sexual decision-making. Journal of Sex Research, 42(4): 324–334.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Selke, S. (2016). Lifelogging. Digital self-tracking and lifelogging – Between disruptive technology and cultural transformation. Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shildrick, M. (1997). Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics. London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stangor, C. & Crandall, C. S. (2000). Threat and the social construction of stigma. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl & J. G. Hull (eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 62–87). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thomas, G. M. & Lupton, D. (2015). Threats and thrills: Pregnancy apps, risk and consumption. Health, Risk & Society, 17(7–8): 495–509.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tracy, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis and communicating impact. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ussher, J. M. (2004). Premenstrual syndrome and self-policing: Ruptures in self-silencing leading to increased self-surveillance and blaming of the body. Social Theory & Health: 254–272.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xu, H., Luo, X., Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. (2011). The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems, 51: 42–52.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woolf, V. (1929). A room of one’s own. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article