References
- Ahva, L., van Dalen, A., Hovden, J-F., Kolbeins, G-H., Löfgren Nilsson, M., Skovsgaard, M. & Väliverronen, J. (2017). A welfare state of mind? Journalism Studies, 18(5): 595–613.
- Altheide, D. L. (2014). Media edge: Media logic and social reality. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
- Altheide, D. L. & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.
- Ausserhofer, J. & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3): 291–314.
- Bene, M. (2017). Go viral on the Facebook! Interactions between candidates and followers on Facebook during the Hungarian general election campaign of 2014. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4): 513–529.
- Bergsson, B. Þ. (2014). Facebook og flokkarnir: Rannsókn á notkun íslenskra stjónmálaflokka á samfélagsmiðlum [Facebook and the parties: A study of the use of Icelandic political parties of social media]. Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration, 10(2): 339–366.
- Blach-Ørsten, M., Eberholst, M.K. & Burkal, R. (2017). From hybrid-media system to hybrid-media politicians: Danish politicians and their cross media presence in the 2015 national election campaign. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(4): 334–347. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2017.1369917 - Blumler, J. G. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3): 209–230.
- Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system. Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system. Politics and power (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chadwick, A., Dennis, J. & Smith, A. P. (2016). Politics in the age of hybrid media. In A. Bruns, G. S. Enli, Skogerbø, A. O. Larsson & C. Christensen (eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 7–22). New York: Routledge.
- Davies, J. (2017, April 19). In France, Snapchat takes the lead in producing political content. DIGIDAY UK [online] Retrieved from
https://digiday.com/media/france-snapchat-takes-lead-producing-political-content/ [accessed 2018, May 24]. - Enli, G. S. & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5): 757–774.
- Gibson, R. K., Lusoli, W. & Ward, S. (2008). Nationalizing and normalizing the local? A comparative analysis of online candidate campaigning in Australia and Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(4): 15–30.
- Gibson, R. K. & McAllister, I. (2015). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the Web on election campaigning. Political Studies, 63(3): 529–547.
- Guðmundsson, B. (2014). New realities of political communications in Iceland and Norway. Nodicum-Mediterraneum, 9(1). Retrieved from
http://nome.unak.is/wordpress/09-1/c60article/new-realities-of-political-communications-in-iceland-and-norway/ [accessed 2019, January 4]. - Guðmundsson, B. (2016). New media: Opportunity for new and small parties? Political communication before the parliamentary elections in Iceland in 2013. Icelandic Review of Politics and Administration, 12(1): 47–66.
- Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hansen, K. M. & Kosiara-Pedersen, K. (2014). Cyber-campaigning in Denmark: Application and effects of candidate campaigning. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2): 206–219.
- Harðarsson, O.Th. (2008). Political communication in Iceland. In J. Strömbäck, M. Ørsten & T. Aalberg (eds.), Communicating politics: Political communication in the Nordic countries 1st ed. (pp. 63–82). Gothenburg: Nordicom.
- Harðarson, Ó. Þ. (2016, November 5). Iceland 2016: Major changes – But not a revolution. Party systems and governments observatory [online]. Retrieved from
http://whogoverns.eu/iceland-2016-major-changes-but-not-a-revolution/ [accessed 2017, December 15]. - Harðarson, Ó. Þ. & Önnudottir, E. H. (2018). Election report Iceland. Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(2): 233–237. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12112 - Heilpern, W. (2016, January 27). Bernie Sanders is using Snapchat to try to win over young voters. Business Insider, Politics [online]. Retrieved from
http://uk.businessinsider.com/bernie-sanders-snapchat-campaign-2016-1?r=US&IR=T [accessed 2019, January 10]. - Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. London and New York: Routledge.
- Jamieson, A. (2016). The first Snapchat election: How Bernie and Hillary are targeting the youth vote. The Guardian. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/05/snapchat-election-2016-sanders-clinton-youth-millennial-vote [accessed 2016, November 17]. - Jensen, J. L., Hoff, J. & Klastrup, L. (2016). Internettet og folketingsvalget 2015 [The Internet and the Danish parliamentary elections 2015]. Report, Danske Medier, Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from
https://blogit.itu.dk/decidis/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/08/Internettet-i-FTvalget-2015-Hoff-Jensen-Klastrup.pdf [accessed 2018, February 14]. - Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1): 72–91.
- Karlsen, R. (2011). A platform for individualized campaigning? Social media and parliamentary candidates in the 2009 Norwegian election campaign. Policy & Internet, 3(4): 1–25.
- Karlsen, R. & Enjolras, B. (2016). Styles of social media campaigning and influence in a hybrid political communication system: Linking candidate survey data with Twitter data. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(3): 338–357.
- Klinger, U. & Svensson, J. (2014). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952 - Klinger, U. & Svensson, J. (2018). The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency. New Media & Society, 20(12): 4653–4670.
- Landerer, N. (2013). Rethinking the logics: A conceptual framework for the mediatization of politics. Communication Theory, 23(3): 239–258.
- Larsson, A. O. (2017). Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish election. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 23(2): 117–131.
- Larsson, A.O. & Moe, H. (2014). Triumph of the underdogs? Comparing twitter use by political actors during two Norwegian election campaigns. Sage Open. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014559015 - Larsson, A. O. & Svensson, J. (2014). Politicians online – Identifying current research opportunities. First Monday, 19(4). Retrieved from
http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4897/3874 [accessed 2019, January 4]. - Lilleker, D. G., Koc-Michalska, K., Schweitzer, E. J., Jacunski, M., Jackson, N. & Vedel, T. (2011). Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of Web campaigning. European Journal of Communication, 26(3): 195–213.
- Moon, A. & Fares, M. (2015). Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Sanders joins Snapchat. Reuters, United States. Retrieved from
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-socialmedia-sanders-idUSKCN0T52MM20151116 [accessed 2016, November 17]. - Nahon, K. & Hemsley, J. (2013). Going viral. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
- Post and Telecom Administration in Iceland (2016). Telecommunication markets in the Nordic and Baltic Countries 2016. Retrieved from
https://www.pfs.is/library/Skrar/Tolfraedi/Norraen-tolfraedi/Telecommunication_markets_in_the_Nordic_and_Baltic_countries_2016.pdf [accessed 2017, August 15]. - Schweitzer, E. J. (2008). Innovation or normalization in E-campaigning? A longitudinal content and structural analysis of German party websites in the 2002 and 2005 national elections. European Journal of Communication, 23(4), 310–327.
- Schweitzer, E. J. (2011). Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in national elections 2002–2009. European Journal of Communication, 26(4): 449–470.
- Smolak, R. (2017). Changes in the mediatization of politics. Interview with Professor Jesper Strömbäck – University of Gothenburg. Central European Journal of Communication, 10(18): 130–136
- Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press and Politics, 13(3): 228–246.
- Strömbäck, J. & Esser, F. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Transforming democracies and reshaping politics. In K. Lundby (ed.), Mediatization of communication (pp. 375–403). Berlin: De Gruyter Mounton.