Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Embodying scenes of moral disorder: Bodily gestures as a site of signification in feminist TikTok activism Cover

Embodying scenes of moral disorder: Bodily gestures as a site of signification in feminist TikTok activism

Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. Agamben, G. (2000). Means without end: Notes on politics (V. Binetti, & C. Casarino, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1996)
  2. Aktulum, K. (2017). What is intersemiotics? A short definition and some examples. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 7(1), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2017.V7.791
  3. Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2019). Epistemic governance: Social change in the modern world. Springer Nature.
  4. Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
  5. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text: Essays (S. Heath, Trans.). Fontana Press. (Original works published 1961–1975)
  6. Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40236733
  7. Boffone, T. (2022). TikTok is theatre, theatre is TikTok. Theatre History Studies, 41(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1353/ths.2022.0028
  8. Code, L. (2013). Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203724132
  9. Davison, P. (2012). The language of internet memes. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120–134). New York University Press.
  10. Dyer, G. (2009). Advertising as communication. Routledge.
  11. Ekman, P. (2004). Emotions revealed. BMJ (Online), 12(Suppl S5), 184. https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0405184
  12. Ekman, P. (2013). Emotion in the human face (2nd ed.). Malor Books.
  13. Ekman, P., & Keltner, D. (1997). Universal facial expressions of emotion: An old controversy and new findings. In U. Segerstråle, & P. Molnár (Eds.), Nonverbal communication: Where nature meets culture (pp. 27–46). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Erlingsdóttir, I. (2021). Fighting structural inequalities: Feminist activism and the #metoo movement in Iceland. In G. Chandra, & I. Erlingsdóttir (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the politics of the #metoo movement (pp. 450–464). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809263-35
  15. Fiske, J., Becker, R., & Jenkins, H. (2011). Introduction to communication studies (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837382
  16. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
  17. Goodwin, M., & Goodwin, C. (2001). Emotion within situated activity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (pp. 239–257). Blackwell.
  18. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
  19. Housley, W., & Fitzgerald, R. (2002). The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200104
  20. Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751
  21. Jasper, J. M. (2018). The emotions of protest. University of Chicago Press.
  22. Jayyusi, L. (2014). Categorization and the moral order. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315794709
  23. Jia, L., & Liang, F. (2021). The globalization of TikTok: Strategies, governance and geopolitics. Journal of Digital Media & Policy, 12(2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp_00062_1
  24. Jing, Y. (2021). Visual affect in films: A semiotic approach. Semiotica, (239), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0081
  25. Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Turn-opening smiles: Facial expression constructing emotional transition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 55(Sep), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.006
  26. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.1-4.02nar
  27. Mishra, M., Yan, P., & Schroeder, R. (2022). TikTok politics: Tit for Tat on the India–China cyberspace frontier. International Journal of Communication, 16, 814–839. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17771/3677
  28. Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Tessendorf, S. (2014). Body Language Communication (Vol. 38/2). De Gruyter.
  29. Nevill, T., Savage, G. C., & Forsey, M. (2023). It's a diagnosis for the rich: Disability, advocacy and the micro-practices of social reproduction. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 44(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2145931
  30. O'Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. In K. Hyland, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 120–137). Bloomsbury.
  31. Peirce, C. S. (1867, November 13). Upon logical comprehension and extension. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, pp. 416–432.
  32. Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage.
  33. Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
  34. Rautajoki, H. (2012). Membership categorization as a tool for moral casting in TV discussion: The dramaturgical consequentiality of guest introductions. Discourse Studies, 14(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611433637
  35. Rautajoki, H. (2014). Kasvokkain julkison kanssa: Vastaanottajan multimodaalinen muotoilu televisiokeskustelun aloituksissa [Facing the public: Multimodal recipient design in the opening of television discussions]. Media & Viestintä, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.23983/mv.63045
  36. Rautajoki, H. (2022). Relational scaffolding of justifications in policymaking: Deploying the multi standard of identifications in EU policy negotiation. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 11(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2022.2142143
  37. Rautajoki, H. (2023). Actualizing societal membership in imaginary interaction: The “real construction of society” in the opening of current affairs TV discussion. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.122849
  38. Rautajoki, H., & Fitzgerald, R. (2022). Populating ‘solidarity’ in political debate: Interrelational strategies of persuasion within the European parliament in the aftermath of the Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics, 21(5), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21023.rau
  39. Rautajoki, H., & Hyvärinen, M. (2021). Aspects of voice in the use of positioning in polyphonic storytelling: Ventriloquial moves within a biographical interview. Journal of Interdisciplinary Voice Studies, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1386/jivs_00037_1
  40. Rautajoki, H., Toikkanen, J., & Raudaskoski, P. (2020). Embodied ekphrasis of experience: Bodily rhetoric in mediating affect in interaction. Semiotica, (235), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0126
  41. Sacks, H. (1972). Notes on police assessment of moral character. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 280–293). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446261880.n66
  42. Sarbin, T. R. (1995). Emotional life, rhetoric, and roles. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 5(3), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.5.3.03emo
  43. Scott, K. (2021). Memes as multimodal metaphors: A relevance theory analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition, 28(2), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21010.sco
  44. Schiller, D. (2021). The face and the faceness: Iconicity in the early faciasemiotics of Paul Ekman, 1957–1978. Sign Systems Studies, 49(3–4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.06
  45. Selting, M. (1994). Emphatic speech style mdash; with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(3–4), 375–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90116-3
  46. Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce's theory of signs. Cambridge University Press.
  47. Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123
  48. Toikkanen, J. (2020). Feeling the unseen: Imagined touch perceptions in paranormal reality television. The Senses & Society, 15(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2019.1709301
  49. Vadén, T., & Torvinen, J. (2014). Musical meaning in between: Ineffability, atmosphere and asubjectivity in musical experience. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 1(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.2752/205393214X14083775795032
  50. Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
  51. Öfgar [ofgarofgar]. (2021a, October 4). Að fara til læknis sem kona/kynseigin einstaklingur [To go to a doctor as a woman/non binary individual] [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ofgarofgar/video/7015241566830759174
  52. Öfgar [ofgarofgar]. (2021b, September 10). Inn um annað, út um hitt [In one way, out the other] [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ofgarofgar/video/7006240871045778693
  53. Öfgar [ofgarofgar]. (2021c, September 30). #íslensktiktok#íslenskt#íslenskttiktok#öfgar [#iceladni ctiktok#icelandic#icelandictiktok#öfgar] [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ofgarofgar/video/7013788152519249158
  54. Öfgar[ofgarofgar]. (2021d, August 16). Það eiga allir að eiga rétt á að seigja frá sínu ofbeldi [Everybody has a right to tell about their own violence] [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ofgarofgar/video/6997047608845896966
  55. Öfgar [ofgarofgar]. (2022a, May 3). SaKlaUs uNs sEkT eR söNnuÐ [Innocent until proven quilty] [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ofgarofgar/video/7093594106546392325
  56. Öfgar [ofgarofgar]. (2022b, October 31). #öfgar#trending#fyrirþig#memes [#öfgar #trending #foryou #memes] [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@ofgarofgar/video/7025307282128784646
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 35
Published on: Sep 2, 2024
Published by: University of Gothenburg Nordicom
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Heba Sigurdardottir, Hanna Rautajoki, published by University of Gothenburg Nordicom
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.