Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Why Sustainability Polarizes: And How to Bridge the Divide Cover

Why Sustainability Polarizes: And How to Bridge the Divide

By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Cakanlar, A. (2024). Breaking climate change polarization. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 43(4), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156241244737
  2. Cakanlar, A., White, K., & Trudel, R. (2026). The politics of impact: How political ideology shapes perceptions of the environmental impact of individual actions. Journal of Consumer Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.70020
  3. Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037963
  4. Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2628-166X (formerly 1865-5866)
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 29
Published on: Oct 11, 2026
Published by: Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Aylin Cakanlar, published by Nuremberg Institute for Market Decisions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.