Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
International Trade Agreements and Corporate Sustainability Performance in Austria, Germany and Switzerland Cover

International Trade Agreements and Corporate Sustainability Performance in Austria, Germany and Switzerland

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Adardour, Z., Ed-Dafali, S., Mohiuddin, M., El Mortagi, O., Sbai, H., & Bouzahir, B. (2025). Exploring the drivers of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in an emerging market context using a mixed methods approach. Future Business Journal, 11, Article 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00530-w
  2. Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
  3. Buttke, L., Schötteler, S., Seuring, S., & Ebinger, F. (2024). The German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act: Impacts on sustainable supply chain management from a stakeholder perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 29(5), 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2024-0058
  4. Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
  5. Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
  6. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  7. da Cunha, Í. G. F., Policarpo, R. V. S., de Oliveira, P. C. S., Abdala, E. C., & do Nascimento Rebelatto, D. A. (2025). A systematic review of ESG indicators and corporate performance: Proposal for a conceptual framework. Future Business Journal, 11, Article 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00539-1
  8. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
  10. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805
  11. Hummel, K., & Jobst, D. (2024). An overview of corporate sustainability reporting legislation in the European Union. Accounting in Europe, 21(3), 320–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2024.2312145
  12. IBM Corp. (2024). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 30.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.
  13. Kalemli-Özcan, S., Sørensen, B., Villegas-Sanchez, C., Volosovych, V., & Yeşiltaş, S. (2024). How to construct nationally representative firm-level data from the Orbis global database: New facts on SMEs and aggregate implications for industry concentration. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 16(2), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20220036
  14. Kim, J., & Yang, W. (2026). ESG performance in the regulatory transformation era: A systematic thematic review (2020–2024). Frontiers in Sustainability, 6, Article 1680398. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1680398
  15. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  16. Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Tang, D. Y., & Zhong, R. (2024). The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1795–1847. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12548
  17. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
  18. Pinheiro, A. B., dos Santos, J. I. A. S., Cherobim, A. P. M. S., & Segatto, A. P. (2024). What drives environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance? The role of institutional quality. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(2), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2023-0091
  19. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  20. The jamovi project. (2025). jamovi (Version 2.6) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
  21. Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford University Press.
  22. Yamano, N., Alsamawi, A., Webb, C., Cimper, A., Zürcher, C., & Chiapin Pechansky, R. (2023). Development of the OECD Inter-Country Input-Output Database 2023 (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5a5d0665-en
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ngoe-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2385-8052 | Journal ISSN: 0547-3101
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 17
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2026
Published online: Oct 8, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
JEL:

© 2026 Benjamin Treitler, Zsuzsanna Széles, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.