Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Three Most Common Needs for Training on Measurement Uncertainty Cover

The Three Most Common Needs for Training on Measurement Uncertainty

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML (2012). International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd Edition, JCGM 200:2012. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM200-2012.
  2. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). (2023). Overview and implementation of the CIPM MRA, Version 1.3. CIPM MRA-P-11. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/43742162/CIPM-MRA-P-11.pdf.
  3. EURAMET e.V. (2016). Strategic Research Agenda for Metrology in Europe, Version 1.0. ISBN 978-3-942992-37-4. https://www.euramet.org/Media/news/G-GNP-STR-003_SRA_web.pdf.
  4. Brown, R. J. C., Janssen, J.-T. (2021). The value of stable, comparable and standardised measurement: Enabling confidence in decision making for societal challenges. Metrologia, 58 (3), 033001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/abe8e1.
  5. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2022). Quality Infrastructure for Sustainable Development Index (QI4SD): Supporting sustainable development goals with quality infrastructure. https://hub.unido.org/sites/default/files/publications/online_MAIN_REPORT_final.pdf (Accessed September 2025).
  6. EURAMET e.V. (2016). Industry impact report. https://tinyurl.com/49pnx49a (Accessed September 2025).
  7. van der Veen, A. M., Cox, M. G., Martins, L. L., et al. (2021). Good practice in evaluating measurement uncertainty: Compendium of examples. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4282094.
  8. International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM). (1999). Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes (Technical Supplement revised in October 2003). https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/43742162/CIPM-MRA-2003.pdf.
  9. BIPM, OIML, ILAC, ISO. (2011). Joint BIPM, OIML, ILAC and ISO declaration on metrological traceability (Updated in November 2018). https://www.oiml.org/en/about/joint-declarations/pdf/bipm-oiml-ilac-iso-joint-declaration-2018.pdf.
  10. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (2008)a. Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM100-2008E.
  11. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (2008)b. Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” — Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. JCGM 101:2008. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM101-2008.
  12. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (2011). Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 2 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” — Extension to any number of output quantities. JCGM 102:2011. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM102-2011.
  13. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (2012). Evaluation of measurement data — The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. JCGM 106:2012. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM106-2012.
  14. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (2023). Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement – Part 1: Introduction. JCGM 104:2009. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGMGUM-1-2023.
  15. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML. (2020). Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement – Part 6: Developing and using measurement models. JCGM GUM-6:2020. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGMGUM-6-2020.
  16. Bich, W., Cox, M., Michotte, C. (2016). Towards a new GUM – an update. Metrologia, 53 (5), S149. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/5/S149.
  17. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). (2020). ILAC Policy on Metrological Traceability of Measurement Results. ILAC-P10:07/2020. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=123220.
  18. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). (2020). ILAC Policy for Measurement Uncertainty in Calibration. ILAC-P14:09/2020. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=123348.
  19. European Accreditation (EA). (2022). Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in calibration. EA-4/02 M:2022. https://european-accreditation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/EA-4-02.pdf.
  20. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2017). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
  21. NCSL International. (2013). Determining and reporting measurement uncertainties. (RP-12) 2013.
  22. United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS). (2024). The expression of uncertainty and confidence in measurement. M3003 Edition 6. https://www.ukas.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/M3003-The-expression-of-uncertainty-and-confidence-in-measurement.pdf (Accessed September 2025).
  23. EURACHEM/CITAC. (2012). Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement: Eurachem/CITAC Guide (3rd ed.). ISBN 978-0-948926-30-3. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/QUAM2012_P1.pdf.
  24. Kool, W. (2012). JCGM survey (GUM): Collated responses. JCGM-WG1-SC5-N12-15. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/43684251/WG1-SC5-N12-15_JCGM_GUM_Survey_Collated_responses.pdf/f7366713-1d01-6d6b-4f91-86bd9c08b49e (Accessed September 2025).
  25. Cox, M. (2020). Advancing measurement uncertainty — Comprehensive examples for key international standards. Publishable Summary for 17NRM05 EMUE. https://empir.npl.co.uk/emue/wp-content/uploads/sites/49/2021/02/17NRM05-EMUE-Publishable-Summary-M27.docx (Accessed September 2025).
  26. Munier, V., Merle, H., Brehelin, D. (2013). Teaching Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty in Elementary School. International Journal of Science Education, 35 (16), 2752–2783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.640360.
  27. Priemer, B., Hellwig, J. (2018). Learning About Measurement Uncertainties in Secondary Education: A Model of the Subject Matter. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9768-0.
  28. Eichstädt, S., Keidel, A., Tesch, J. (2021). Metrology for the digital age. Measurement: Sensors, 18, 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2021.100232.
  29. EURAMET e.V. (2023). European Metrology Network for Mathematics and Statistics: Strategic Research Agenda 2023 – 2033, Version 1.0. ISBN 978-3-942992-78-7. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/mathmet/strategy/strategic-research-agenda.
  30. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM). (2022). News from JCGM-WG1 – August 2022. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/58020018/News-from-JCGM-August-2022.pdf (Accessed September 2025).
  31. PTB, CEM, GUM, IMS SAS, INRIM, IPQ, LNE, METAS, NPL, SMD, DAM, NSAI, POLITO, JRC, NURE. (2022). Survey of examples on Measurement Uncertainty evaluation. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/mathmet/activities/measurement-uncertainty-training-activity/for-trainees-measurement-uncertainty-training (Accessed September 2025).
  32. Wikipedia. (2023). List of uncertainty propagation software.
  33. INRIM, IMBiH, IPQ, LNE, METAS, NPL, POLITO, MSL. (2023). Survey of available software for Measurement Uncertainty evaluation. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/mathmet/activities/measurement-uncertainty-training-activity/for-trainees-measurement-uncertainty-training (Accessed September 2025).
  34. Pennecchi, F., Harris, P. (2023). Mathmet Measurement Uncertainty Training activity – Overview of courses, software, and classroom examples. Acta IMEKO, 12 (2). https://doi.org/10.21014/actaimeko.v12i2.1310.
  35. European Metrology Network for Mathematics and Statistics. (2023). Measurement Uncertainty Training activity. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/mathmet/activities/measurement-uncertainty-training-activity (Accessed September 2025).
  36. INRIM, CEM, DAM, GUM, IMS SAS, IPQ, JRC, LNE, METAS, NPL, NSAI, NURE, POLITO, SMD, UKAS, UKN. (2023). Survey of existing training courses on Measurement Uncertainty evaluation. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/mathmet/activities/measurement-uncertainty-training-activity/for-trainees-measurement-uncertainty-training (Accessed September 2025).
  37. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). (2021). Participation in the CIPM MRA: National Metrology Institutes, Designated Institutes, International organizations, Version 1.0. CIPM MRA-P-13. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/43742162/CIPM-MRA-P-13.pdf.
  38. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). (2023). CIPM MRA participants. https://www.bipm.org/en/cipm-mra/participation (Accessed September 2025).
  39. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). (2022). Calibration and measurement capabilities in the context of the CIPM MRA: Guidelines for their review, acceptance and maintenance. Version 1.2. CIPM MRA-G-13. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/43742162/CIPM-MRA-G-13.pdf.
  40. EURAMET e.V. (2023). Knowledge transfer. https://www.euramet.org/knowledge-transfer (Accessed September 2025).
  41. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). (2023). BIPM Capacity building and knowledge transfer programme (CBKT). https://e-learning.bipm.org/ (Accessed September 2025).
  42. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). (2023). ILAC MRA and signitories – Facts & Figures. https://ilac.org/about-ilac/facts-and-figures (Accessed September 2025).
  43. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). (2022). ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement: Policy and management. ILAC-P4:06/2022. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=124569.
  44. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). (2023). ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement: Scope and Obligations. ILAC-P5:11/2023. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=125462.
  45. Kellermann, M. (2019). Ensuring Quality to Gain Access to Global Markets: A Reform Toolkit. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1372-6.
  46. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). (2017). Conformity assessment – Requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies. ISO/IEC 17011:2017. https://www.iso.org/standard/67198.html.
  47. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2022). Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189:2022 (ISO/TC 2012, CEN/TC 140). https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html.
  48. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2012). Conformity assessment – Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection. ISO/IEC 17020:2012 (CEN/CLC/TC 1). https://www.iso.org/standard/52994.html.
  49. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2023). Conformity assessment – General requirements for the competence of proficiency testing providers. ISO/IEC 17043:2023. https://www.iso.org/standard/80864.html.
  50. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2016). General requirements for the competence of reference material producers. ISO 17034:2016. https://www.iso.org/standard/29357.html.
  51. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). Biotechnology – Biobanking – General requirements for biobanking. ISO 20387:2018 (ISO/TC 276). https://www.iso.org/standard/67888.html.
  52. Comité Français d’Accréditation (COFRAC). (2020). Recommandations pour la mise en œuvre de la norme NF EN ISO/IEC 17025 en vue de l’accréditation des Laboratoires, Révision 01. LAB GTA 86. https://tools.cofrac.fr/documentation/LAB-GTA-86.
  53. EU Academy. (2024). Estimation of uncertainties and the use of reference materials - EURM. https://academy.europa.eu/courses/estimation-of-uncertainties-and-the-use-of-reference-materials-eurm/view/ (Accessed September 2025).
  54. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). (2023). Structure of the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement and Procedure for Expansion of the Scope of the ILAC Arrangement. ILAC-R6:11/2023. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=125464.
  55. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC). (2021). ILAC Guidelines for Measurement Uncertainty in Testing. ILAC-G17:01/2021. https://ilac.org/?ddownload=123528.
  56. International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML), International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM). (2020). National metrology systems – Developing the institutional and legislative framework. OIML D 1:2020. https://www.oiml.org/en/publications/documents/en/files/pdf_d/d001-e20.pdf.
  57. International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML). (2023). National Metrology Systems – The framework for States to participate in the globalization of trade and services that depend on measurement-based requirements. https://www.oiml.org/en/about/policy-and-legislation/pdf/bipm-oiml-d1-global.pdf.
  58. International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML). (2017). The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment decisions in legal metrology. OIML G 19:2017. https://www.oiml.org/en/files/pdf_g/g019-e17.pdf.
  59. International Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML). (2004). Training and qualification of legal metrology personnel. OIML D 14:2004. https://www.oiml.org//en/publications/documents/en/files/pdf_d/d014-e04.pdf.
  60. European Cooperation in Legal Metrology (WELMEC). (2006). Elements for deciding the appropriate level of confidence in regulated measurements (Accuracy classes, MPE in-service, non-conformity, principles of uncertainty). WELMEC 4.2. https://www.welmec.org/welmec/documents/guides/4.2/4-2.pdf.
  61. European Cooperation in Legal Metrology (WELMEC). (2009). Prepackages – uncertainty of measurement: Guidelines to estimate the uncertainty of measurement when determining the actual quantity of product in prepackages. WELMEC 6.9. https://www.welmec.org/welmec/documents/guides/6.9/6-9.pdf.
  62. European Cooperation in Legal Metrology (WELMEC). (2020). Measuring Instruments Directive 2014/32/EU: Common Application for Utility Meters (Water Meters and Thermal Energy Meters). WELMEC 13.1. https://www.welmec.org/welmec/documents/guides/13.1/2020/WELMEC_Guide_13.1_v2020.pdf.
  63. European Cooperation in Legal Metrology (WELMEC). (2024). Measuring Instruments Directive (2014/32/EU): Guide for generating sampling plans for statistical verification according to Annex F and F1 of MID 2014/32/EU. WELMEC 8.10. https://www.welmec.org/welmec/documents/guides/8.10/2024/WELMEC_Guide_8.10_2024.pdf.
  64. Subcommittee of the AAPT Committee on Laboratories (2014). AAPT recommendations for the undergraduate physics laboratory curriculum. https://www.aapt.org/resources/upload/labguidlinesdocument_ebendorsed_nov10.pdf (Accessed September 2025).
  65. Wan, T. (2023). Investigating student reasoning about measurement uncertainty and ability to draw conclusions from measurement data in inquiry-based university physics labs. International Journal of Science Education, 45 (3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2156824.
  66. Bornath, T., Walter, G. (2020). Messunsicherheiten – Anwendungen: Für das Physikalische Praktikum. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30565-9.
  67. Chimeno, M. F., Gonzalez, M. A., Castro, J. R. (2005). Teaching measurement uncertainty to undergraduate electronic instrumentation students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21 (3), 525–533.
  68. Kuselman, I. (2008). Teaching metrology and quality in chemistry based on methods of mathematical statistics and e-learning. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 13, 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0383-9.
  69. University of Tartu, Estonia. (2024). Estimation of measurement uncertainty in chemical analysis. Online course. https://sisu.ut.ee/measurement (Accessed September 2025).
  70. Schanning, I. (2019). Design, Implementation, and Analysis of an Algebra-based Treatment of Measurement Uncertainty. Thesis, University of California San Diego, CA, US. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9798w8gn (Accessed September 2025).
  71. White, G. H. (2008). Basics of estimating measurement uncertainty. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, 29 (suppl. 1), S53–S60.
  72. Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Leipzig. (2024). Physics for students of human medicine. IMPP-Gegenstandskatalog. https://www.impp.de/pruefungen/allgemein/gegenstandskataloge.html?file=files/PDF/Gegenstandskataloge/Medizin/GK_physik_Mai2014_2.pdf (Accessed September 2025).
  73. Kok, K. W. (2022). Certain about uncertainty: What students need to know about measurement uncertainties to compare data sets. Thesis, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Germany. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/25656/dissertation_kok_karel.pdf (Accessed September 2025).
  74. Allie, S., Buffler, A., Campbell, B., Lubben, F., Evangelinos, D., Psillos, D., Valassiades, O. (2003). Teaching Measurement in the Introductory Physics Laboratory. The Physics Teacher 41 (7), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1616479.
  75. Hu, D., Zwickl, B. M. (2018). Examining students’ views about validity of experiments: From introductory to Ph.D. students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14, 010121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010121.
  76. Möhrke, P., Runge, B.-U. (2020). Arbeiten mit Messdaten: Eine praktische Kurzeinführung nach GUM. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60660-5.
  77. Pollard, B., Hobbs, R., Henderson, R., Caballero, M. D., Lewandowski, H. J. (2021). Introductory physics lab instructors’ perspectives on measurement uncertainty. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, 010133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010133.
  78. Séré, M.-G., Journeaux, R., Larcher, C. (1993). Learning the statistical analysis of measurement errors. International Journal of Science Education, 15 (4), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150406.
  79. Volkwyn, T. S., Allie, S., Buffler, A., Lubben, F. (2008). Impact of a conventional introductory laboratory course on the understanding of measurement. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 4, 010108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010108.
  80. European Metrology Network for Climate and Ocean Observation. (2021). Stakeholder needs review report – Executive summary, Version 1.0. https://tinyurl.com/nhd62c8u (Accessed September 2025).
  81. European Metrology Network for Advanced Manufacturing. (2024). Strategic research agenda, Version 1.0. https://tinyurl.com/3mk7vz2x (Accessed September 2025).
  82. European Metrology Network for Radiation Protection. (2024). Strategic agenda – our vision. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/radiation-protection/strategic-agenda (Accessed September 2025).
  83. European Metrology Network for Smart Electricity Grids. (2023). Strategic research agenda, Version 1.0. https://www.euramet.org/smart-electricity-grids/strategy/strategic-research-agenda (Accessed September 2025).
  84. European Metrology Network Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (TraceLabMed). (2019). Overview of EMN TraceLabMed, Version 4.0. https://tinyurl.com/ykuj9pt6 (Accessed September 2025).
  85. EURAMET e.V. (2024). Events. https://www.euramet.org/publications-media-centre/events/archived-events (Accessed September 2025).
  86. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
  87. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV.
  88. Lubben, F., Campbell, B., Buffler, A., Allie, S. (2001). Point and set reasoning in practical science measurement by entering university freshmen. Science Education, 85 (4), 311–327.
  89. Schulz, J. (2022). Entwicklung eines Testinstrumentes zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen im Umgang mit Messunsicherheiten. Thesis, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/24870/dissertation_schulz_johannes.pdf (Accessed September 2025).
  90. Vignal, M., Geschwind, G., Pollard, B., Henderson, R., Caballero, M. D., Lewandowski, H. (2023). Survey of physics reasoning on uncertainty concepts in experiments: An assessment of measurement uncertainty for introductory physics labs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19, 020139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020139.
  91. Heinicke, S. (2013). Aus Fehlern wird man klug: Eine genetisch-didaktische Rekonstruktion des “Messfehlers”. In Inquiry-based Learning – Forschendes Lernen. IPN Kiel, 46–58. ISBN 978-3-89088-360-1.
  92. National Physical Laboratory (NPL). (2022). NPL's training development process. https://tinyurl.com/3duh2byd (Accessed September 2025).
  93. European Metrology Network for Mathematics and Statistics. (2023). Report on the measurement uncertainty training workshop. https://tinyurl.com/333y2cnf (Accessed September 2025).
  94. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
  95. Fähnrich, F., Thein, C. (2024). Flip the classroom – Mathe lernen mit dem Taschenlehrer. https://www.fliptheclassroom.de/.
  96. European Metrology Network for Mathematics and Statistics. (2023). For teachers – Measurement uncertainty training. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/mathmet/activities/measurement-uncertainty-training-activity/for-teachers-measurement-uncertainty-training (Accessed September 2025).
  97. Lira, I. (2002). Evaluating the Measurement Uncertainty: Fundamentals and Practical Guidance. CRC Press, ISBN 9781420034363.
  98. Gerlach, G., Sommer, K.-D. (2024). Messunsicherheit: Kurz und praktisch - für Ingenieure und Naturwissenschafler. De Gruyter, ISBN 978-3110500233.
  99. Measurement Uncertainty Training Activity. (2024). Videos about key aspects of measurement uncertainty. https://www.euramet.org/european-metrology-networks/mathmet/activities/measurement-uncertainty-training-activity/for-trainees-measurement-uncertainty-training (Accessed September 2025).
  100. Kok, K. (2022). Digital learning environment on measurement uncertainties. https://lernen.physik.hu-berlin.de/measurementuncertainties/ (Accessed September 2025).
  101. Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre- and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552.
  102. Jurgeit, S., Sander, C., Ohlrogge, M. (2022). On the practical experiences of MU-trainings for laboratory and industry partners. https://tinyurl.com/3duh2byd (Accessed September 2025).
  103. European Metrology Network for Climate and Ocean Observation. (2022). Strategic research agenda, Version 1.0. https://tinyurl.com/y4d4pff8 (Accessed September 2025).
  104. EURAMET e.V. (2024). EURAMET Technical Committees. https://www.euramet.org/technical-committees (Accessed September 2025).
  105. Pennecchi, F. (2022). Sharing best practices in MU training – INRIM. https://tinyurl.com/3duh2byd (Accessed September 2025).
  106. Sousa, J. A., Pellegrino, O. (2022). Sharing best practices in MU training – IPQ. https://tinyurl.com/3duh2byd (Accessed September 2025).
  107. Pirée, H., Caebergs, T. (2022). Best practices and lessons learnt (SMD). https://tinyurl.com/3duh2byd (Accessed September 2025).
  108. Thompson, A. (2024). MU Training challenges relating to machine learning. https://tinyurl.com/mry8tcy7 (Accessed September 2025).
  109. European Metrology Network for Mathematics and Statistics. (2023). Information & communication – Measurement uncertainty training. https://tinyurl.com/uty9nxd7 (Accessed September 2025).
Language: English
Page range: 257 - 275
Submitted on: Jun 2, 2025
|
Accepted on: Aug 14, 2025
|
Published on: Oct 6, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2025 Katy Klauenberg, Peter Harris, Philipp Möhrke, Francesca Pennecchi, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.