Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Effect of Differential Pressure and Permanent Pressure Loss on Multi-Hole Orifice Plate

Measurement Science Review
Volume 23 (2023): Issue 5 (October 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2023

References

  1. ISO. (2003). Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full — Part 1: General principles and requirements. ISO 5167-1:2003. https://www.iso.org/standard/28064.html
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Reader-Harris, M. (2015). Orifice Plates and Venturi Tubes. Springer, ISBN 978-3319168791.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Nasiruddin, S., Singh, S. N. (2021). Performance evaluation of an innovative design modification of an orifice meter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 80, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101944
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Singh, R. K., Singh, S. N., Seshadri, V. (2010). Performance evaluation of orifice plate assemblies under non-standard conditions using CFD. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, 17, 397-406.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Abd, H. M., Alomar, O. R., Mohamed, I. A. (2019). Effects of varying orifice diameter and Reynolds number on discharge coefficient and wall pressure. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 65, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.01.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Dayev, Z. A., Kairakbaev, A. K. (2019). Modeling of coefficient of contraction of differential pressure flowmeters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 66, 128-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.02.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Tharakan, T. J., Rafeeque, T. A. (2016). The role of backpressure on discharge coefficient of sharp edged injection orifices. Aerospace Science and Technology, 49, 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.12.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Beck, S. B. M., Mazille, J. (2002). A study of a pressure differential flow meter that is insensitive to inlet conditions. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 12 (5-6), 379-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(01)00034-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Kumar, P., Ming Bing, M. W. (2011). A CFD study of low pressure wet gas metering using slotted orifice meters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 22 (1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.12.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Huang, S., Ma, T., Wang, D., Lin, Z. (2013). Study on discharge coefficient of perforated orifices as a new kind of flowmeter. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 46, 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.11.022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Malavasi, S., Messa, G., Fratino, U., Pagano, A. (2012). On the pressure losses through perforated plates. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 28, 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2012.07.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Barros Filho, J. A., Santos, A. A. C., Navarro, M. A., Jordão, E. (2015). Effect of chamfer geometry on the pressure drop of perforated plates with thin orifices. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 284, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.12.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Zhao, T., Zhang, J., Ma, L. (2011). A general structural design methodology for multi-hole orifices and its experimental application. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25, 2237-2246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0706-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Singh, V. K., Tharakan, T. J. (2015). Numerical simulations for multi-hole orifice flow meter. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 45, 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.08.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Đurđević, M., Bukurov, M., Tašin, S., Bikić, S. (2019). Experimental research of single-hole and multi-hole orifice gas flow meters. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 70, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101650
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Đurđević, M., Bukurov, M., Tašin, S., Bikić, S. (2020). Numerical study of single-hole and multi-holes orifice flow parameters. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 14, 215-226. https://doi.org/10.47176/jafm.14.01.31472
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Mehmood, M. A., Ibrahim, M. A., Ullah A., Inayat, M. H. (2019). CFD study of pressure loss characteristics of multi-holed orifice plates using central composite design. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 70, 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.101654
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Raheem, A., Siddiqi, A. S. B., Ibrahim, A., Ullah, A., Inayat, M. H. (2021). Evaluation of multi-holed orifice flowmeters under developing flow conditions – An experimental study. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 79, 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2021.101894
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. El-Azm Aly, A. A., Chong, A., Nicolleau, F., Beck, S. (2010). Experimental study of the pressure drop after fractal-shaped orifices in turbulent pipe flows. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 34 (1), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.09.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hasečic, A., Imamovic, J., Bikic, S., Dzaferovic, E. (2021). Investigation of the contamination influence on the parameters of gas flow through multihole orifice flowmeter. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 7501808. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3063198
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Zedan, M. F., Teyssandier, R. G. (1990). Effect of errors in pressure tap locations on the discharge coefficient of a flange tapped orifice plate. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 1 (3), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(9090003-P)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. ANSYS Inc. (2013). ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide, 724.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Erdal, A., Andersson, H. I. (1997). Numerical aspects of flow computation through orifices. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 8 (1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-5986(97)00017-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Shah, M. S., Joshi, J. B., Kalsi, A. S., Prasad, C. S. R., Shukla, D. S. (2012). Analysis of flow through an orifice meter: CFD simulation. Chemical Engineering Science, 71, 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.11.022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Hubert, M., Vandervieren, E. (2008). An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52 (12), 5186-5201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2007.11.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2023-0029 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 227 - 236
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 25, 2023
Published on: Oct 17, 2023
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 times per year
Keywords:
Single-hole and multi-hole orifice plate,
differential pressure,
permanent pressure loss,
pump energy assessment
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2023 TM Hariguru, S Srinivasan, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2023): Issue 5 (October 2023)Next article