References
- [1] CISPR. (2011). Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 4-2: Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling - Measurement instrumentation uncertainty. CISPR Std. 16-4-2:2001+AMD1:2014+AMD2:2018 CSV.
- [2] Hill, D.A., Kanda, M. (1997). Measurement Uncertainty of Radiated Emissions. NIST Technical Note 1389.
- [3] Skocik, P., Pospisilik, M., Kresalek, V., Adamek, M. (2021). Indirect measurement of shielding effectiveness of an enclosure for a security camera. Measurement Science Review, 21 (1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2021-0006
- [4] IEEE. (2012). American National Standard Guide for Electromagnetic Compatibility—Computations and Treatment of Measurement Uncertainty. IEEE/ANSI Std. C63.23-2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2013.6482151
- [5] ETSI. (2003). Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM); Recommended approach, and possible limits for measurement uncertainty for the measurement of radiated electromagnetic fields above 1 GHz. ETSI Std. TR 102 215 V1.1.2.
- [6] JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008.
- [7] Otomanski, P., Pawlowski, E., Szlachta, A. (2021). The evaluation of expanded uncertainty of DC voltages in the presence of electromagnetic interferences using the LabVIEW environment. Measurement Science Review, 21 (5), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2021-0019
- [8] Bronaugh, E.L., Heirman, D.N. (2004). Estimating measurement uncertainty – A brief introduction to the subject. IEEE EMC Society Newsletter, 200, 32-43.
- [9] Zingarelli, M., Grego, R. (2011). Improving EMC measurement uncertainty with digital EMI receivers & optical fiber technology from 10 Hz up to 6 GHz. In 10th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, 26-30. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6078498
- [10] Braun, S., Frech, A., Russer, P. (2008). CISPR specification and measurement uncertainty of the time-domain EMI measurement system. In 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2008.4652078
- [11] Azpurua, M.A., Pous, M., Silva, F. (2015). On the statistical properties of the peak detection for time-domain EMI measurements. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 57 (6), 1374-1381. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2015.2456983
- [12] Bosi, M., Sanchez, A.M., Pajares, F.J., Peretto, L. (2021). A methodology to analyze and evaluate the uncertainty propagation due to temperature and frequency and design optimization for EMC testing instrumentation. Electricity, 2 (3), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.3390/electricity2030018
- [13] Ayob, M.E.B., Sukor, J.A., Jenu, M.Z.M. (2016). An overview on the measurement uncertainty evaluation of electromagnetic compatibility test. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11 (11), 7214-7216. http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2016/jeas_0616_4415.pdf
- [14] Ayob, M.E. (2017). Characterization of the measurement uncertainty for the electromagnetic conducted and radiated emission test. Master Thesis. University Tun Hussein Onn, Batu Pahat, Malaysia. http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/id/eprint/799
- [15] Song, J., Guo, Y.X. (2015). Investigation of measurement uncertainties and errors in EMI measurement apparatus. In 2015 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, 593-595. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEMC.2015.7175319
- [16] Bittera, M., Smiesko, V., Kovac, K. (2012). Modified uncertainty estimation of antenna factor measurement by standard site method. Measurement, 45 (2), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.07.002
- [17] Morioka, T., Komiyama, K. (2006). Uncertainty analysis of dipole antenna calibration above a ground plane. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 48 (4), 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2006.884505
- [18] Bittera, M., Mician, M., Smiesko, V. (2015). Selection of antenna factor for EMI measurements. In Measurement 2015: 10th International Conference on Measurement. Bratislava, Slovakia: IMS SAS, 199-202. https://www.measurement.sk/M2015/proceedings/199_Bittera-1.pdf
- [19] CISPR. (2016). Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods - Part 2-3: Methods of measurement of disturbances and immunity - Radiated disturbance measurements. CISPR Std. 16- 2-3:2016+AMD1:2019 CSV.
- [20] Stecher, M. (2001). A detailed analysis of EMI test receiver measurement uncertainty. In 2001 IEEE EMC International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, 464-468. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2001.950684
- [21] Medler, J. (2010). Uncertainty contribution of the EMI test receiver in RF disturbance measurements. In 2010 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, 994-997. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEMC.2010.5475871
- [22] Bittera, M. (2014). Modeling broadband wire antennas with complex geometry. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1082-1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.094
- [23] Chen, Z., Foegelle, M., Harrington, T. (1999). Analysis of log periodic dipole array antennas for site validation and radiated emissions testing. In 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. IEEE, 618-623. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1999.810088
- [24] Bittera, M., Smiesko, V., Kovac, K., Hallon, J. (2010). Directional properties of the Bilog antenna as a source of radiated electromagnetic interference measurement uncertainty. IET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation, 4 (10), 1469-1474. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2009.0187
- [25] IEEE. (2017). American National Standard for Electromagnetic Compatibility -Radiated Emission Measurements in Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Control - Calibration and Qualification of Antennas (9 kHz to 40 GHz). IEEE/ANSI Std. C63.5-2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.7920447