Determination of Dynamic Range of Stand-alone Shock Recorders

Stakhova, Anzhelika; Kyrychuk, Yurii; Nazarenko, Nataliia

doi:10.2478/msr-2022-0026

Abstract

In aircraft construction, when creating samples of new equipment, shock tests are often performed, both on individual components and the entire product. It requires introducing non-destructive testing devices into production, it is one of the most important factors in accelerating scientific and technological progress, raising the quality and competitiveness of manufactured products. Applying modern means of non-destructive testing, there is the problem of their protection from external vibrations, which affect the sensitivity, accuracy and reliability of high-precision measurements. In such cases, the conversion of measuring information during powerful vibration and shock tests, as a rule, is carried out by piezoelectric acceleration sensors. Although to provide impact testing, there is a need to develop and use stand-alone recorders. The main requirements for these recorders are to ensure the autonomy and operability of the recorder onboard the test product and to ensure the synchronization of the registration of the shock load.

References

[1] Ahmed, H., Nandi, A.K. (2020). Condition Monitoring with Vibration Signals: Compressive Sampling and Learning Algorithms for Rotating Machines. John Wiley-IEEE Press. ISBN 978-1-119-54462-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2005). Mechanical vibration — Ground-borne noise and vibration arising from rail systems — Part 1: General guidance. ISO 14837-1:2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1996). Mechanical vibration — Evaluation of machine vibration by measurements on non-rotating parts. ISO 10816:1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Teterina, I.A., Korchagin, P.A., Letopolsky, A.B. (2018). Results of investigating vibration load at human operator’s seat in utility machine. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2018). Springer, 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_19
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Kovtun, I., Boiko, J., Petrashchuk, S., Kalaczynski, T. (2018). Theory and practice of vibration analysis in electronic packages. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 182, 02015. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818202015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Harris, C.M., Piersol, A.G. (2002). Harris’ Shock and Vibration Handbook. McGraw-Hill, 1025-1083. ISBN 0-07-137081-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Thomson, W.T. (2018). Theory of Vibration with Applications. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203718841
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Chen, S., Xue, S., Zhai, D., Tie, G. (2020). Measurement of freeform optical surfaces: Trade-off between accuracy and dynamic range. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 14 (5), 1900365. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201900365
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Ojovanu, E., Dragomir, A., Adam, M., Andrusca, M., Deac, C.N., Cardasim, M., Mocanu, G. (2020). Mechanical fault detection by vibration monitoring of electrical equipment. In 2020 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical and Power Engineering (EPE). IEEE, 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPE50722.2020.9305685
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Bendat, J.S., Piersol, A.G. (2011). Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-24877-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] He, H., Wen, C.K., Jin, S. (2017). Generalized expectation consistent signal recovery for nonlinear measurements. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT). IEEE, 2333-2337. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2017.8006946
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Larsen, W.S. (2018). Analysis of the Shock Response Spectrum and Resonant Plate Testing Methods. Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Michigan, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Rofiki, I., Santia, I. (2018). Describing the phenomena of students’ representation in solving ill-posed and well-posed problems. International Journal on Teaching and Learning Mathematics, 1 (1), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/ijtlm.v1i1.571310.18860/ijtlm.v1i1.5713
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] Scripal, E.N., Ermakov, R.V., Gutcevitch, D.E., L’vov, A.A., Sytnik, A.A. (2018). Test methods and results of the MEMS inertial sensors. In 2018 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus). IEEE, 983-986. https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConRus.2018.8317254
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] Sandrolini, L., Mariscotti, A. (2021). Impact of short-time Fourier transform parameters on the accuracy of EMI spectra estimates in the 2-150 kHz supraharmonic interval. Electric Power Systems Research, 195, 107130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107130
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Rupitsch, S.J. (2019). Piezoelectric Sensors and Actuators: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57534-5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Maji, A. (2019). Scaling shock response spectra - contributing factors. SAND2019-1662C, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, USA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Determination of Dynamic Range of Stand-alone Shock Recorders

Abstract

Paradigm

My account