Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Estimation of the Energy Performance Measurements of Gas Stoves

Measurement Science Review
Volume 22 (2022): Issue 4 (August 2022)
By:
Open Access
|May 2022

References

  1. [1] Budya, H., Arofat, M.Y. (2011). Providing cleaner energy access in Indonesia through the megaproject of kerosene conversion to LPG. Energy Policy, 39, 7575-7586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.06110.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.061
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2018). Kompor gas LPG dan LNG/NG tekanan rendah untuk rumah tangga (Gas stove with low pressure of LPG and LNG/NG for household). SNI 8660:2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2019). Kompor gas LPG dan LNG/NG untuk komersil (Gas stove with LPG and LNG/NG for commercial). SNI 7613:2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Stant, L.T., Aaen, P.H., Ridler, N.M. (2016). Comparing methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty given in the JCGM ‘evaluation of measurement data’ documents. Measurement, 94, 847-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.01510.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] ISO. (2008). Uncertainty of measurement — Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995) — Supplement 1: Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 Supplement 1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Yeung, H., Papadopoulos, C.E. (2000). Natural gas energy flow (quality) uncertainty estimation using Monte Carlo simulation method. In 10th IMEKO TC9 Conference on Flow Measurement (FLOMEKO 2000). IMEKO.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Sediva, S., Uher, M., Havlikova, M. (2015). Application of the Monte Carlo method to estimate the uncertainty of air flow measurement. In Proceedings of the 2015 16th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC). IEEE, 465-469, DOI: 10.1109/CarpathianCC.2015.7145124.10.1109/CarpathianCC.2015.7145124
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Castrup, S. (2010). Comparison of methods for establishing confidence limits and expanded Uncertainties. In Measurement Science Conference, Pasadena, USA.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Acko, B., Godina, A. (2005). Verification of the conventional measuring uncertainty evaluation model with Monte Carlo simulation. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 4 (2), 76-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM04(2)3.03910.2507/IJSIMM04(2)3.039
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Castro, H. (2021). Validation of the GUM using the Monte Carlo method when applied in the calculation of the measurement uncertainty of a compact prover calibration. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 72, 101877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.10187710.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101877
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Bahassou, K., Salih, Oubrek, M., Jalid, A. (2019). Measurement uncertainty on the correction matrix of the coordinate measuring machine. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 10 (2), 669-676.10.34218/IJARET.10.2.2019.064
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Theodorou, D., Meligotsidou, L., Karavoltsos, S., Burnetas, A., Dassenakis, M., Scoullos, M. (2011). Comparison of ISO-GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: Application to direct cadmium measurement in water by GFAAS. Talanta, 83 (5), 1568-1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.05910.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.05921238753
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Theodorou, D., Zannikou, Y., Anastopoulos, G., Zannikos, F. (2011). Coverage interval estimation of the measurement of gross heat of combustion of fuel by bomb calorimetry: Comparison of ISO GUM and adaptive Monte Carlo method. Thermochimica Acta, 526 (1-2), 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.09.00410.1016/j.tca.2011.09.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Couto, P.R.G., Damasceno, J.C., Borges, R.M.H. (2006). Uncertainty estimation of mechanical assays by ISO GUM 95 and Monte Carlo simulation – case study: Tensile strength, torque and brinell hardness measurements. In XVIII IMEKO World Congress: Metrology for a Sustainable Development. IMEKO.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Mahmoud, G.M., Hegazy, R.S. (2017). Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the uncertainty estimation in hardness measurements. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 8, 14. https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/201701410.1051/ijmqe/2017014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Jalid, A., Hariri, S., El Gharad, A., Senelaer, J.P. (2016). Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo methods on the flatness uncertainty estimation in coordinate measuring machine. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 7 (3), 302. https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/201601310.1051/ijmqe/2016013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Navacerrada, M.A., Sanchidrián, C.D., Pedrero, A., Martínez, L.I. (2008). Calculus of the uncertainty in acoustic field measurements: Comparative study between the uncertainty propagation method and the distribution propagation method. In V Congreso Ibérico de Acústica, Coimbra, Portugal.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Junga, R., Chudy, P., Pospolita, J. (2017). Uncertainty estimation of the efficiency of small-scale boilers. Measurement, 97, 186-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.11.01110.1016/j.measurement.2016.11.011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Ramnath, V. (2010). Comparison of the GUM and Monte Carlo measurement uncertainty techniques with application to effective area determination in pressure standards. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 1 (1) 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/201001310.1051/ijmqe/2010013
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Wen, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, D., Pan, J. (2013). Adaptive Monte Carlo and GUM methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of cylindricity error. Precision Engineering, 37 (4), 856-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.05.00210.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.05.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Ling, M., Li, H., Li, Q. (2014). Measurement uncertainty evaluation method considering correlation and its application to precision pentrifuge. Measurement Science Review, 14 (6), 308-316. https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2014-004210.2478/msr-2014-0042
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Kusnandar, N. (2015). Metode pengukuran asupan panas kompor gas berdasarkan SNI 7368:2011 dan SNI 7469:2013 (The method of measuring gas stove heat input based on SNI 7368:2011 and SNI 7469:2013). Jurnal Standarisasi, 17 (3), 233-240, DOI: 10.31153/js.v17i3.323.10.31153/js.v17i3.323
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Utomo, B., Kusnandar, N., Lailiyah, Q., Ramadhani, W.S. (2019). An evaluation of heat input and efficiency test method based on SNI 7368:2011 – single burner LPG gas stove with igniter system. Jurnal Standarisasi, 21 (3), 193-201, DOI: 10.31153/js.v21i3.773.10.31153/js.v21i3.773
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Badan Standarisasi Nasional. (2010). Kompor gas bahan bakar LPG satu tungku dengan sistem pemantik (Single burner LPG gas stove with ignition system). SNI 7368:2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] IEC - IECEE. (2004). Laboratory procedure for preparation, attachment, extension and use of thermocouples. CTL-OP 108-Ed.1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] ISO. (2008). Uncertainty of measurement - Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] ISO. (2009). Uncertainty of measurement - Part 1: Introduction to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. ISO/IEC Guide 98-1:2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Beckert, S.F., Domeneghetti, G., Bond, D. (2013). Use of pooled standard deviation of paired samples in calculating the measurement uncertainty by the Monte Carlo Method. In 16th International Congress of Metrology. EDP Sciences, 03003. https://doi.org/10.1051/metrology/20130300310.1051/metrology/201303003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Sediva, S., Havlikova, M. (2013). Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo method for evaluation measurement uncertainty of indirect measurements. In Proceedings of the 14th International Carpathian Control Conference. IEEE, DOI: 10.1109/CarpathianCC.2013.6560563.10.1109/CarpathianCC.2013.6560563
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Solaguren-Beascoa Fernandez, M., Alegre Calderon, J.M., Bravo Diez, P.M. (2009). Implementation in MATLAB of the adaptive Monte Carlo method for the evaluation of measurement uncertainties. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 14, 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0475-610.1007/s00769-008-0475-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2022-0020 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 160 - 169
Submitted on: Dec 28, 2021
Accepted on: Mar 21, 2022
Published on: May 14, 2022
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 6 times per year
Keywords:
measurement uncertainty,
national standard,
GUM framework,
Monte Carlo,
thermal energy,
efficiency
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2022 Bayu Utomo, Nanang Kusnandar, Himma Firdaus, Intan Paramudita, Iput Kasiyanto, Qudsiyyatul Lailiyah, Wahyudin P. Syam, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2022): Issue 4 (August 2022)Next article