References
- [1] Klepacki, D., Sabat, W., Kamuda, K., Kurylo, K. (2019). Signal integrity in microelectronic hybrid systems made on metal substrates. Circuit World, 45 (1), 45–51.10.1108/CW-11-2018-0085
- [2] Pawłowski, S., Plewako, J. (2015). Applicability assessment for simplified formulas to compute surface impedance at screened surfaces. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, 12, 182–184.10.15199/48.2015.12.47
- [3] European Standard. (2010). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) Testing and measurement techniques. Power frequency magnetic field immunity test. BS EN 61000-4-8:2010.
- [4] Witkovsky, V., Frollo, I. (2020). Measurement science is the science of sciences - there is no science without measurement. Measurement Science Review, 20 (1), 1–5.10.2478/msr-2020-0001
- [5] Turzeniecka, D. (1999). Comments on the accuracy of some approximate methods of evaluation of expanded uncertainty. Metrologia, 36 (2), 113–116.10.1088/0026-1394/36/2/6
- [6] Turzeniecka, D. (2000). Errors in the evaluation of the coverage factor as criterion of applications of approximate methods of evaluation of expanded uncertainty. Measurement, 27 (4), 223–229.10.1016/S0263-2241(99)00051-2
- [7] Texas Instruments. (2020). REF50xx Low-Noise, Very Low Drift, Precision Voltage Reference. Data sheet SBOS410I.
- [8] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100:2008.
- [9] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2012). International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), 3rd edition. JCGM 200:2012.
- [10] European Accreditation. (2013). Evaluation of the uncertainty of measurement in calibration. EA-4/02 M:2013.
- [11] Kuwałek, P., Otomański, P., Wandachowicz, K. (2020). Influence of the phenomenon of spectrum leakage on the evaluation process of metrological properties of power quality analyser. Energies, 13, 5338.10.3390/en13205338
- [12] Zakharov, I., Neyezhmakov, P., Botsiura, O. (2017). Verification of the indicating measuring instruments taking into account their instrumental measurement uncertainty. Measurement Science Review, 17 (6), 269–272.10.1515/msr-2017-0033
- [13] National Instruments. (2003). LabVIEW User Manual, Part Number 320999E-01.
- [14] Wells, L.K., Travis, J. (1997). LabVIEW for Everyone. Prentice Hall PTR, ISBN 9780132681940.
- [15] National Instrument. (2003). LabVIEW Measurement Manual, Part Number 322661B-01.
- [16] Sokoloff, L. (2004). Applications in LabVIEW. Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0130161949.
- [17] Otomański, P., Szlachta, A. (2008). The evaluation of expanded uncertainty of measurement results in direct measurements using the LabVIEW environment. Measurement Science Review, 8 (6), 147–150.10.2478/v10048-008-0032-9
- [18] Pawłowski, E. (2017). Design and evaluation of a flow-to-frequency converter circuit with thermal feedback. Measurement Science & Technology, 28 (5), 054004–054013.10.1088/1361-6501/aa57ed
- [19] National Instruments. (2016). M Series Data Acquisition: 16 AI, 10 DIO, 2 AO, NI 6221 (37-Pin), Device Specifications 375201C-01.
- [20] Dorozhovets, M. (2019). Effectiveness of automatic correction of systematic effects in measuring chains. Measurement Science Review, 19 (4), 132–143.10.2478/msr-2019-0019