Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Automated Acquisition of Proximal Femur Morphological Characteristics Cover

Automated Acquisition of Proximal Femur Morphological Characteristics

Measurement Science Review
Volume 14 (2014): Issue 5 (October 2014)
By: Slobodan Tabakovic,  Milan Zeljkovic and  Zoran Milojevic  
Open Access
|Nov 2014

References

  1. [1] Pawlikowski, M., Skalski, K., Haraburda, M. (2003). Process of hip joint prosthesis design including bone remodeling phenomenon. Computers & Structures, 81 (8-11), 887-893.10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00428-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Ramos, A., Completo, A., Relvas, C., Simoes, J.A. (2012). Design process of a novel cemented hip femoral stem concept. Materials & Design, 33, 313-321.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.039
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Garellick, G., Karrbolm, J., Rogmark, C., Herberts, P. (2011). Annual Report 2010. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] International Organisation for Standardization. (2008). Implants for surgery - Partial and total hip joint prostheses - Part 1: Classification and designation of dimensions. ISO 7206-1.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Abadie, P., Lebel, B., Pineau, V., Burdin, G., Vielpeau, C. (2010). Cemented total Hip stem design influence on adaptative cortical thickness and femoral morphology. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 96 (2), 104-110.10.1016/j.otsr.2009.11.011
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Tabakovic, S., Zeljkovic, M., Zivkovic, A. (2013). General parametric model of the body of the total hip endoprosthesis. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 13.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Yuanzhi, C., Shengjun, Z., Yadong, W., Changyong, G., Jing, B., Shinichi, T. (2013). Automatic segmentation technique for acetabulum and femoral head in CT images. Pattern Recognition, 46 (11), 2969-2984.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Galibarov, P.E., Prendergast, P.J., Lennon, A.B. (2010). A method to reconstruct patient-specific proximal femur surface models from planar preoperative radiographs. Medical Engineering & Physics, 32 (10), 1180-1188.10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.08.00920933453
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Otomaru, I., Nakamoto, M., Kagiyama, Y., Takao, M., Sugano, N., Tomiyama, N., Tada, Y., Sato, Y. (2012). Automated preoperative planning of femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty from 3D CT data: Atlas-based approach and comparative study. Medical Image Analysis, 16 (2), 415-426.10.1016/j.media.2011.10.00522119490
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Rawal, B.R., Ribeiro, R., Malhotra, R., Bhatnagar, N. (2012). Design and manufacturing of femoral stems for the Indian population. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 14 (3), 216-223.10.1016/j.jmapro.2011.12.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Yongtae, J., Kuiwoon, C. (2010). Design of patientspecific hip implants based on the 3D geometry of the human femur. Advances in Engineering Software, 41 (4), 537-547.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Ruben, R., Fernandes, P., Folgado, J. (2012). On the optimal shape of hip implants. Journal of biomechanics, 45 (2), 239-246.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.10.03822115063
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Kayabasi, O., Ekici, B. (2011). The effects of static, dynamic and fatigue behaviour on three-dimensional shape optimization of Kayabasi_Ekici type hip prosthesis by finite element method and probabilistic approach. Journal of Biomechanics, 44, 6.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.032
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Sridhar, I., Adie, P.P., Ghista, D.N. (2010). Optimal design of customised hip prosthesis using fiber reinforced polymer composites. Materials & Design, 31 (6), 2767-2775.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.016
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] International Organisation for Standardization. (2011). Health informatics -- Digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) including workflow and data management. ISO 12052.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Li, X. (2010). Semi-automatic segmentation of normal female pelvic floor structures from magnetic resonance images. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cleveland State University, USA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Kale, E.H., Mumcuoglu, E.U., Hamcan, S. (2012). Automatic segmentation of human facial tissue by MRI-CT fusion: A feasibility study. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 108 (3), 1106-1120.10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.07.00622958985
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Gamage, P., Xie, S.Q., Delmas, P., Xu, W.L. (2011). Diagnostic radiograph based 3D bone reconstruction framework: Application to the femur. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 35 (6), 427-437.10.1016/j.compmedimag.2010.09.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Wang, J., Ye, M., Liu, Z., Wang, C. (2009). Precision of cortical bone reconstruction based on 3D CT scans. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 33 (3), 235-241.10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.01.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Hauser, J.R. (2009). Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Engineering Models. Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9920-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Mahaisavariya, B., Sitthiseripratip, K., Tongdee, T., Bohez, E., Sloten, J.V., Oris, P. (2002). Morphological study of the proximal femur: A new method of geometrical assessment using 3-dimensional reverse engineering. Medical Engineering & Physics, 24 (9), 617-622.10.1016/S1350-4533(02)00113-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Ababneh, S., Prescott, J., Gurcan, M. (2011). Automatic graph-cut based segmentation of bones from knee magnetic resonance images for osteoarthritis research. Medical Image Analysis, 15 (4), 438-448.10.1016/j.media.2011.01.007313169521474362
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Muhit, A.A., Pickering, M.R., Scarvell, J.M., Ward, T., Smith, P.N. (2013). Image-assisted non-invasive and dynamic biomechanical analysis of human joints. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 58, (13), 4679-4702.10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/467923774692
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Van Cauter, S., De Beule, M., Han Haver, A., Verdonk, P., Verhegghe, B. (2012) Automated extraction of the femoral anatomical axis for determining the intramedullary rod parameters in total knee arthroplasty. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 28, 158-169. 10.1002/cnm.147825830211
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2014-0039 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 285 - 293
Submitted on: Jan 3, 2014
|
Accepted on: Sep 30, 2014
|
Published on: Nov 5, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Automated acquisition,
hip,
morphological characteristics
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2014 Slobodan Tabakovic, Milan Zeljkovic, Zoran Milojevic, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2014): Issue 5 (October 2014)Next article