Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysis of Flatness Deviations for Austenitic Stainless Steel Workpieces after Efficient Surface Machining Cover

Analysis of Flatness Deviations for Austenitic Stainless Steel Workpieces after Efficient Surface Machining

Measurement Science Review
Volume 14 (2014): Issue 4 (August 2014)
By: K. Nadolny and  W. Kapłonek  
Open Access
|Aug 2014

References

  1. [1] Niemczewska-Wójcik, M., Sładek, J., Tabaka, M., Wójcik, A. (2012). Product quality assessment - measurement and analysis of the surface topography. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 21 (2), 271-280.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Hloch, S., Valicek, J. (2011). Prediction of distribution relationship of titanium surface topography created by abrasive waterjet. International Journal of Surface Science and Engineering, 5 (2-3), 152-168.10.1504/IJSURFSE.2011.041399
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Wen, X-L. et al. (2012). Flatness error evaluation and verification based on new generation geometrical product specification (GPS). Precision Engineering, 36 (1), 70-76.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2011.07.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Tolerances of form, orientation - general terms (replace by [14]). PN-78/M-02137.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] International Organization for Standardization. (1999). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Geometrical features. Part 1: General terms and definitions. ISO 14660-1:1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] International Organization for Standardization. (1999). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Geometrical features. Part 2: Extracted median line of a cylinder and a cone, extracted median surface, local size of an extracted feature. ISO 14660-2:1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Geometrical Products Specifications (GPS) - Flatness - Part 1: Vocabulary and parameters of flatness. ISO/TS 12781-1:2003.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Ricci, F. (2012). Effective Product Lifecycle Management: the role of uncertainties in addressing design, manufacturing and verification processes. PhD thesis, Polytechnic University of Turin, Turin, Italy. http://porto.polito.it/2501694/1/Tesi_Ricci.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Calvo, R., Gómez, E., Domingo, R. (2014). Vectorial method of minimum zone tolerance for flatness, straightness, and their uncertainty estimation. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15 (1), 31-44.10.1007/s12541-013-0303-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Ilyas Khan, M., Ma, S.Y. (2014). Efficient genetic algorithms for measurement of flatness error and development of flatness plane based on minimum zone method. Advanced Materials Research, 941, 2232-2238.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.941-944.2232
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Ye, R.F. et al. (2012). Minimum zone evaluation of flatness error using an adaptive iterative strategy for coordinate measuring machines data. Advanced Materials Research, 472, 25-29.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.472-475.25
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Ren, M.J., Cheung, C.F., Kong, L.B. (2012). A task specific uncertainty analysis method for least-squaresbased form characterization of ultra-precision freeform surfaces. Measurement Science and Technology, 23 (5), 054005.10.1088/0957-0233/23/5/054005
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] He, G. et al. (2014). Conicity error evaluation using sequential quadratic programming algorithm. Precision Engineering, 38 (2), 330-336.10.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.11.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] International Organization for Standardization. (2006). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) - Geometrical tolerancing - Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out. UNE-EN ISO 1101:2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Lakota, S., Görög, A. (2011). Flatness measurement by multi-point methods and by scanning methods. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 1 (1), 124-127.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Skibicki, D., Sempruch, J., Pejkowski, L. (2012). Steel X2CrNiMo17-12-2 Testing for uniaxial, proportional and non-proportional loads as delivered and in the annealed condition. Materials Science Forum, 726, 171-180.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.726.171
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Dobrzański, L.A., Brytan, Z., Rosso, M. (2007). Sinter-hardening process applicable to stainless steels. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 24 (2), 11-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Deutsche Edelstahlwerke GmbH. (2008). Nichtrostender austenitischer Stahl X2CrNiMo17-12-2. http://www.dew-stahl.com/fileadmin/files/dewstahl.com/documents/Publikationen/Werkstoffdatenblaetter/RSH/1.4404_de.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Stout, K.J. et al. (1993). The Development of Methods for the Characterization of Roughness in Three Dimensions. Publication No. EUR 15178 EN (Final Report) BCR. Brussels, Belgium: European Community.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2014-0028 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 204 - 212
Submitted on: Nov 19, 2013
|
Accepted on: Jul 31, 2014
|
Published on: Aug 23, 2014
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Flatness errors,
stylus profilometry,
surface topography analysis,
austenitic stainless steel,
surface machining
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2014 K. Nadolny, W. Kapłonek, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2014): Issue 4 (August 2014)Next article