Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Surgical Implants Made from Weak Magnetic Materials Cover

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Surgical Implants Made from Weak Magnetic Materials

Open Access
|Aug 2013

References

  1. [1] Frollo, I., Andris, P., Gogola, D., Přibil, J., Valkovič, L., Szomolányi, P. (2012). Magnetic field variations near weak magnetic materials studied by magnetic resonance imaging techniques. IEEE Transaction onMagnetics, 48 (8), 2334-2339.10.1109/TMAG.2012.2191298
  2. [2] Marcon, P., Bartusek, K., Dokoupil, Z., Gescheidtova, E. (2012). Diffusion MRI: Mitigation of magnetic field inhomogeneities. Measurement Science Review, 12 (5), 205-212.10.2478/v10048-012-0031-8
  3. [3] Youtaka, I., Tmohiro, Y. (2005). History, present and future of diagnostic imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Japanisch-Deutsche MedizinischeBerichte, 50, 40-51.
  4. [4] Berry, E., Bulpitt, A.J. (2009). Fundamentals of MRI:An Interactive Learning Approach. CRC Press.
  5. [5] Keevil, S. (2001). Magnetic resonance imaging in medicine. Physic Education, 36, 476-485.10.1088/0031-9120/36/6/305
  6. [6] Durdík, Š., Babincová, M., Kontrišová, K., Bergemann, C., Babinec, P. (2013). Magnetic nanoparticles as contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. The General Science Journal, 1-8, http://gsjournal.net/.
  7. [7] Cicmanec, P. (1980). Basic Physics 2: Electricity andMagnetism. Bratislava: ALFA. (in Slovak)
  8. [8] Bjørnerud, A., Johansson, L. (2004). The utility of superparamagnetic contrast agents in MRI: Theoretical consideration and applications in the cardiovascular system. NMR in Biomedicine, 17, 465-477.10.1002/nbm.90415526351
  9. [9] Majewski, P., Thierry, B. (2007). Functionalized magnetite nanoparticles-synthesis, properties and bioapplications. Critical Reviews in Solid State andMaterials Sciences, 32, 203-215.10.1080/10408430701776680
  10. [10] Ma, Z., Liu, H. (2007). Synthesis an surface modification of magnetic particles for application in biotechnology and biomedicine. China Particuology, 5, 1-10.10.1016/j.cpart.2006.11.001
  11. [11] Štrbák, O., Kopčanský, P., Timko, M., Frollo, I. (2013). Single biogenic magnetite nanoparticle physical characteristics. A biological impact study. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 49 (1), 457-462.
  12. [12] Bartusek, K., Dokoupil, Z., Gescheidtova, E. (2006). Magnetic field mapping around metal implants using an asymmetric spin echo MRI sequence. MeasurementScience and Technology, 17 (12), 3293-3300.10.1088/0957-0233/17/12/015
  13. [13] Schenck, J.F. (1996). The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Medical Physics, 23 (6), 815-851.10.1118/1.5978548798169
  14. [14] Shellock, F.G. (2002). Biomedical implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. Journal of MagneticResonance Imaging, 16, 721-732.
Language: English
Page range: 165 - 168
Published on: Aug 24, 2013
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2013 D. Gogola, A. Krafčík, O. Štrbák, I. Frollo, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.