Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Optimum Dataset Size and Search Space for Minimum Zone Roundness Evaluation by Genetic Algorithm Cover

Optimum Dataset Size and Search Space for Minimum Zone Roundness Evaluation by Genetic Algorithm

Measurement Science Review
Volume 13 (2013): Issue 3 (June 2013)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2013
References

References

  1. [1] International Organization for Standardization (2011). ISO 1101, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)-tolerances of form, orientation, location and run out, 2nd ed., Geneva, Switzerland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] ASME B89.3.1 (2003) Measurement of Out-Of- Roundness.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Sharma, R., Rajagopal, K. & Anand, S. (2000). A genetic algorithm based approach for robust evaluation of form tolerances,, 19(1), 46-57.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Dhanish, P.B. & Shunmugam, M.S. (1991). An algorithm for form error evaluation - using the theory of discrete and linear chebyshev approximation,, 92, 309-324.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Murthy, T.S.R. & Abdin, S.Z. (1980). Minimum zone evaluation of surfaces,, 20, 123-136.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Kovvur, Y., Ramaswami, H., Anand R.B. & Sam Anand (2008). Minimum-zone form tolerance evaluation using particle swarm optimisation,, 4(1/2).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Weber, T., Motavalli, S., Fallahi, B., & Cheraghi, S.H. (2002). A unified approach to form error evaluation,, 26, 269-278.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Wen, X., Xia, Q. & Zhao, Y. (2006). An effective genetic algorithm for circularity error unified evaluation,, 46, 1770-1777.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Yan, L., Yan, B., Cai, L., Hu, G. & Wang, M. (2009). Research on roundness error evaluation of shaft parts based on genetic algorithms with transfer-operator, ICEMI 2009 - Proceedings of Nineth International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, 2362-2366.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Rossi, A., Antonetti, M., Barloscio M. & Lanzetta, M. (2011). Fast genetic algorithm for roundness evaluation by the minimum zone tolerance (MZT) method,, 44(7), 1243-1252.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Rossi, A. & Lanzetta, M. (2013). Optimal blind sampling strategy for minimum zone roundness evaluation by metaheuristics,, 37, 241-247, doi:10.1016/j.precisioneng.2012.09.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Moroni, G. & Petrò, S. (2008). Geometric tolerance evaluation: A discussion on minimum zone fitting algorithms,, 32(3), 232-237.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Chajda, J., Grzelka, M.¸ Gapinski, B., Pawłowski, M. Szelewski, M. & Rucki, M. (2008). Coordinate measurement of complicated parameters like roundness, cylindricity, gear teeth or free-form surface, 8th Int. Conf. on Advanced Manufacturing Operations.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Gapinski, B, & Rucki, M. (2007). Uncertainty in CMM Measurement of Roundness, AMUEM 2007 - International Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement Sardegna, Trento, Italy, 16-18 July 2007.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Gapinski, B, Grezelka, M. & Rucki, M. (2006). Some aspects of the roundness measurement with CMM, XVIII IMEKO World Congress Metrology for a Sustainable Development September, 17 - 22, 2006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Rossi, A. (2001). A form of deviation-based method for coordinate measuring machine sampling optimization in an assessment of roundness,,, 215, 1505-1518.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Rossi, A. (2001). A minimal inspection sampling technique for roundness evaluation, 1st CIRP International Seminar on PRogress in Innovative Manufacturing Engineering (Prime), Sestri Levante, Italy, June, 20-22, 2001, 189-196.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Weckenmann, A., Knauer, M., & Kunzmann, H. (1998). The influence of measurement strategy on the uncertainty of CMM-measurements., 47(1), 451-454.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Weckenmann, A., Weber, H., Eitzert, H. & Garmer, M. (1995). Functionality-oriented evaluation and sampling strategy in coordinate metrology,, 17(4), 244-52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Rossi, A. & Lanzetta, M. (2013). Roundness: a closed form upper bound for the centroid to minimum zone center distance by worst-case analysis,, 46 (7), 2251-2258, doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.03.025.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. [21] National Physical Laboratory (UK), Data Generator for Chebyshev Best-Fit Circle, http://www.npl.co.uk/mathematics-scientific-computing/software-supportfor-metrology/,acc.05/2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msr-2013-0018 | Journal eISSN: 1335-8871
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 107
Published on: Jun 21, 2013
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open
Keywords:
Minimum zone tolerance (MZT),
roundness error,
genetic algorithm,
CMM
Related subjects:
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Control engineering, metrology and testing

© 2013 A. Meo, L. Profumo, A. Rossi, M. Lanzetta, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 13 (2013): Issue 3 (June 2013)
Next article