Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Management of Truncated Data in Speech Transmission Evaluation for Pupils in Classrooms Cover

Management of Truncated Data in Speech Transmission Evaluation for Pupils in Classrooms

Open Access
|Apr 2013

References

  1. [1] Stevens, S.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement., 103 (2684), 677-680.
  2. [2] Barbato, G., Farné, S., Genta, G. (2008). Management of subjective evaluations represented by ordinal scales. In, 3-5 September 2008. IMEKO, 89-94.
  3. [3] Astolfi, A., Bottalico, P., Barbato, G. (2012). Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms.131 (1), 247-257.
  4. [4] Klein, J.P., Moeschberger, M.L. (2003). S(2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
  5. [5] International Organization for Standardization (2003).. ISO 9921. Genève.
  6. [6] Houtgast, T., Steeneken, H.J.M. (1971). Evaluation of speech transmission channels by using artificial signals., 25, 355-367.
  7. [7] Steeneken, H.J.M., Houtgast, T. (1980). A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality., 67, 318-326.
  8. [8] European Committee for Standardization (2011).. EN 60268-16. Brussels.
  9. [9] Sato, H., Yoshino, H., Nagatomo, M. (1998). Relationship between speech transmission index and easiness of speech perception in reverberatory fields., 103 (5), 2999.
  10. [10] Sato, H., Morimoto, M., Sato, H., Wada, M. (2008). Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields., 123 (4), 2087-2093.
  11. [11] Morimoto, M., Sato, H., Kobayashi, M. (2004). Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces., 116 (3), 1607-1613.
  12. [12] Sato, H., Bradley, J.S., Morimoto, M. (2005). Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms., 117 (3), 1157-1167.
  13. [13] Prodi, N., Visentin, C., Farnetani, A. (2010). Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms., 128 (1), 172-181.
  14. [14] Prodi, N., Visentin, C., Feletti, A. (2013). On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: Ranking of noise interference and of age influence., 133 (1), 255-268.
  15. [15] International Organization for Standardization (1991).. ISO TR 4870. Genève.
  16. [16] Bonaventura, P., Paoloni, A., Canavesio, F., Usai, P. (1986).. Roma: Fondazione Ugo Bordoni. (Technical Report 3C1286).
  17. [17] Aurora site (last viewed February 24, 2013). http://pcfarina.eng.unipr.it/Aurora_XP/STI.htm.
  18. [18] International Organization for Standardization (2009).. ISO 3382-1. Genève.
  19. [19] Tukey, J.W. (1977).. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
  20. [20] Hofmann, D., Linss, G. (2003). Challenges and chances of internet metrology., 3 (1), 1-17.
  21. [21] NIST/SEMATECH.. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/, February 2013.
  22. [22] Bork, I. (2000). A comparison of room simulation software: The 2nd round robin on room acoustic computer simulation., 86, 943-956.
  23. [23] Johnson, L.G. (1964).. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  24. [24] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008).. JCGM 100:2008. Sèvres.
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 82
Published on: Apr 3, 2013
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2013 G. Genta, A. Astolf, P. Bottalico, G. Barbato, R. Levi, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.