Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fatigue tests of heat-treated rails in the R350HT grade Cover

Fatigue tests of heat-treated rails in the R350HT grade

By: Sylwester Żak  
Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Rail heat treatment line.
Rail heat treatment line.

Figure 2

Image of the microstructure at the corner of the rail heads after heat treatment: (a) rail from melt no. 1 and (b) rail from melt no. 2.
Image of the microstructure at the corner of the rail heads after heat treatment: (a) rail from melt no. 1 and (b) rail from melt no. 2.

Figure 3

Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 5 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 5 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative and positive sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.
Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 5 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 5 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative and positive sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.

Figure 4

Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 6 – pattern D4 and (b) sample 6 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.
Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 6 – pattern D4 and (b) sample 6 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.

Figure 5

Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 7 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 7 – pattern D2. The area of positive sulphur segregation with a small amount of negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.
Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 7 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 7 – pattern D2. The area of positive sulphur segregation with a small amount of negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.

Figure 6

Hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head for the R350HT grade according to the standard [4] (a), and hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head – sample 4 (b).
Hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head for the R350HT grade according to the standard [4] (a), and hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head – sample 4 (b).

Figure 7

Dimensions of the sample for testing the fatigue crack growth rate.
Dimensions of the sample for testing the fatigue crack growth rate.

Figure 8

Dimensions of the sample for determining the K
                     Ic factor.
Dimensions of the sample for determining the K Ic factor.

Figure 9

Fatigue crack growth rate – Paris’ law.
Fatigue crack growth rate – Paris’ law.

Figure 10

Sample fractures for determining the fatigue crack growth rate representing. The photos represent the following samples: (a) sample 2a, (b) sample 2b and (c) sample 3c.
Sample fractures for determining the fatigue crack growth rate representing. The photos represent the following samples: (a) sample 2a, (b) sample 2b and (c) sample 3c.

Figure 11

Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2a.
Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2a.

Figure 12

Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2b.
Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2b.

Figure 13

Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2c.
Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2c.

Figure 14

View of fractures for samples (a) 3c and (b) 3d.
View of fractures for samples (a) 3c and (b) 3d.

Figure 15

Sample number 2a in the holders after fatigue testing.
Sample number 2a in the holders after fatigue testing.

Chemical composition for individual melts_

NumberMass in liquid state (%)10−4 % (ppm)
of samplesof meltsCMnSiPSCrAl maxV maxN maxO maxH max
1321,0360.791.090.360.0080.0170.0690.0040.0010.0056182.00
2321,0370.771.070.350.0080.0170.0770.0040.0010.0055181.83
3321,0380.771.080.390.0090.0140.0760.0040.0010.0054181.29
4331,7130.781.120.370.0160.0170.0780.0040.0030.0050181.50
5331,8230.771.100.380.0120.0120.080.0030.0020.0040141.3
6331,8240.781.130.380.0110.0190.080.0030.0020.0049201.1
7331,9910.791.130.360.0120.0110.080.0030.0020.0043191.4

Basic range of chemical composition and mechanical properties of rail steel grades for heat treatment_

Steel gradeMass (%) R m (MPa) A (%)Hardness (HBW)
CSiMn P max S max Cr
R2600.60–0.820.13–0.600.65–1.250.0300.030≤0.1588010260–300
R350HT0.70–0.820.13–0.600.65–1.250.0250.030≤0.151,1759350–390
R350LHT0.70–0.820.13–0.600.65–1.250.0250.030≤0.301,1759350–390
R370CrHT0.68–0.840.38–1.020.65–1.150.0250.0250.35–0.651,2809370–410
R400HT0.88–1.070.18–0.620.95–1.350.0250.025≤0.301,2808400–440

Conditions for determining the fatigue crack growth rate_

Fatigue crack growth rate
Sample no.2a2b2c
Load rate R 0.50.50.5
Amplitude typeSinusoidalSinusoidalSinusoidal
Load frequency (Hz)151515
Initial ΔK (MPa m1/2)9.329.399.27
Initial K max (MPa m1/2)18.6418.7818.54
Initial ΔP (kN)6605.006600.006608.00
Final crack length (mm)27.2626.9327.75
Temperature (°C)Room temp.Room temp.Room temp.
Measurement of the crack front
Average a (mm)25.2424.4724.69
Standard deviation (mm)1.00411.13140.3606
Paris’ law (da/dN) = CK) m
C 2.0673 × 107 4.8451 × 108 8.5625 × 108
m 1.922.452.26
R m (MPa)1,292
R p0,2 (MPa)894

Condition check P max/P Q ≤ 1_1_

Sample P Q (N) P max (N) P max/P Q
3a17,81018,3441.03
3b18,39018,5741.01
3c17,24018,2741.06
3d18,56018,7461.01
3e18,56018,7461.01

Fatigue strength test results_

Sample no.AmplitudeForce (kN)Result
1a0.0013510.78No cracks
1b0.0013510.88No cracks
1c0.0013510.75No cracks
2a0.0013510.83No cracks
2b0.0013510.83No cracks
2c0.0013510.88No cracks
3a0.0013510.83No cracks
3b0.0013510.76No cracks
3c0.0013510.57No cracks

Checking the validity criterion K Ic_

SampleCheck the conditions
a ≥ 2.5 K Q R p 0.2 2 \hspace{1em}{\left(\frac{{K}_{{\rm{Q}}}}{{R}_{{\rm{p}}0.2}}\right)}^{2} , [m] B ≥ 2.5 K Q R p 0.2 2 \hspace{1em}{\left(\frac{{K}_{{\rm{Q}}}}{{R}_{{\rm{p}}0.2}}\right)}^{2} , [m]
Steel – R350HT
3a0.01981 > −0.00790.02498 > −0.0079
3b0.01983 > −0.00840.02502 > −0.0084
3c0.01991 > −0.00730.02498 > −0.0073
3d0.02011 > −0.00880.02505 > −0.0088
3e0.01993 > −0.00870.02496 > −0.0087

Validity check K Ic_

SampleCheck the conditions
(Wa) > 2.5 K Q R p 0.2 2 {\left(\frac{{K}_{{\rm{Q}}}}{{R}_{{\rm{p}}0.2}}\right)}^{2} , [m]
Steel – R350HT
3a0.02013 > −0.0079
3b0.02020 > −0.0084
3c0.02017 > −0.0073
3d0.01993 > −0.0088
3e0.02003 > −0.0087

Results of determining the stress intensity factor_

Sample no. K Ic (MPa m1/2)Average value K Ic (MPa m1/2)Standard deviation K Ic (MPa m1/2)
3a39.2039.861.50
3b40.27
3c37.59
3d41.27
3e40.39
2a39.9540.121.09
2b40.77
2c40.38
2 d38.35
2e41.16
1a46.2442.972.70
1b45.36
1c40.32
1d40.67
1e42.28
Requirements according to EN13674-1 for the R350HT gradeSingle min. value 30 MPa m1/2 Average value min 32 MPa m1/2

Results of testing the fatigue crack growth rate_

Sample no.da/dN = CK) m Indicator m/Gc ΔK = 10, MPa m1/2 Indicator m/Gc ΔK = 13.5, MPa m1/2
C m
2a2.0673 × 107 1.915317.0030.22
2b4.8851 × 108 2.453813.7828.77
2c8.5625 × 108 2.258315.5230.57
1a1.4207 × 107 1.949812.6622.72
1b1.1649 × 107 2.028812.4522.88
1c2.8016 × 107 1.667713.0321.50
4a1.3571 × 107 2.106617.0032.64
4b1.4220 × 107 2.073516.8431.38
4c1.4038 × 107 2.071816.5630.84
Requirements of the EN13674-1 standardMax 17 m/GcMax 55 m/Gc

Validation requirements for 321038 A101 rail (samples 3)_

Determining K Ic
Sample no. 3a3b3c3d3e
R m (MPa) 1,331
R p0.2 (MPa) 696
Test temperature (°C) −20−20−20−20−20
P max (kN) 18.344318.573918.274418.745618.7456
P Q (kN) 17.8118.3917.2418.5418.56
Time test (s) 35.2161.1571.0176.2769.1
K Q (MPa m1/2) 39.240.2737.5941.2740.97
Rate test (MPa m1/2/s) 1.110.660.530.540.59
Mean value of a 19.8119.8319.9120.1119.53
Standard dev. of a 1.10661.15800.94590.87391.2609
0.45 ≤ (a/W) ≤ 0.55 0.500.500.500.500.50
P max/P Q < 1.1 1.031.011.061.011.01
K max < 0.6 K Q K max (MPa m1/2)22.0822.222.222.122.1
0.6 K Q (MPa m1/2)23.5224.16222.55424.76224.582

Validation requirements for 321038 A101 rail (samples 3) – the criterion 2_5(K Q/R p0_2)_

Determining K Ic
Sample no. 3a3b3c3d3e
2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 < a 0 2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 0.00790.00840.00730.00880.0087
a 0 19.8119.8319.9120.1119.93
2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 < B 2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 0.00790.00840.00730.00880.0087
B 24.9825.0249.9825.0524.96
2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 < W − a2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 0.00790.00840.00730.00880.0087
W − a20.1320.2020.1719.9320.03
K Ic results 39.240.2737.5941.2740.97

Basic properties of the tested rail steel for individual rail types_

Sample no.Basic mechanical properties
Tensile strength, R m (MPa)Yield strength R p0.2 (MPa 20°C)Elongation A (%)Necking Z (%)Hardness (HB)
11,2868819.118376
21,24985410.322365
31,23887510.923363
41,26287710.722366
51,28490411.223364
61,27089910.423367
71,29388511.521370
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2025-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 127 - 142
Submitted on: Apr 8, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 12, 2025
Published on: Jun 30, 2025
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Sylwester Żak, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.