Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Influence of heat treatment conditions of Hardox 500 steel on its resistance to abrasive wear Cover

Influence of heat treatment conditions of Hardox 500 steel on its resistance to abrasive wear

Open Access
|Mar 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the T-07 tribotester. 1 – sample, 2 – rubber-rimmed steel wheel, 3 – abrasive, 4 – load, and P1, P2, and P3 – regions of samples subjected to surface topography evaluation.

Figure 2

Time–temperature graph for Hardox 500 steel. Assigned temperatures for individual transformations, phases, and components of the structure: pearlite – 736°C, ferrite – 795°C, bainite – 576°C, martensite (50%) – 331°C, martensite (90%) – 252°C, and M S – 366°C.

Figure 3

Hardness measurement results of Hardox 500 steel under different heat treatment conditions.

Figure 4

Microstructure of Hardox 500 in the as-delivered condition and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 5

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after water cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 6

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after mineral oil cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 7

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after synthetic oil cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 8

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after air at 5 bar pressure cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 9

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after air at 3 bar pressure cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 10

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after air at 1 bar pressure cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 11

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after air cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 12

Microstructure of Hardox 500 after furnace cooling and etched with 5% HNO3: (a) LM and (b) SEM.

Figure 13

Relative abrasive wear resistance coefficient k b and hardness of Hardox 500 steel under different heat treatment conditions.

Figure 14

Effect of hardness on the mass loss of Hardox 500 steel under different heat treatment conditions.

Figure 15

SEM analysis under unetched conditions of surfaces of Hardox 500 steel subjected to abrasive wear testing under different heat treatment conditions: (a) as-delivered condition, (b) after water cooling, (c) after mineral oil cooling, (d) after synthetic oil cooling, (e) after air cooling at 5 bar pressure, (f) after air cooling at 3 bar pressure, (g) after air cooling at 1 bar pressure, (h) after air cooling, and (i) after furnace cooling.

Figure 16

3D images obtained by SEM analysis of sample surfaces subjected to wear testing along the longitudinal direction of abrasive movement: (a) as-delivered condition, (b) after water cooling, (c) after mineral oil cooling, (d) after synthetic oil cooling, (e) after air cooling at 5 bar pressure, (f) after air cooling at 3 bar pressure, (g) after air cooling at 1 bar pressure, (h) after air cooling, and (i) after furnace cooling.

Figure 17

Cross-sectional SEM analysis under unetched conditions of selected samples subjected to abrasive wear: (a) as-delivered condition, (b) after mineral oil cooling, (c) after air cooling at 1 bar pressure, and (d) after furnace cooling.

Figure 18

Roughness parameters R a, R p, and R v of Hardox 500 steel under different heat treatment conditions subjected to abrasive wear testing.

Figure 19

Profilograms of Hardox 500 steel under different heat treatment conditions subjected to abrasive wear testing.

Mass consumption and volumetric wear loss determined experimentally and predicted by the Archard model_

State of heat treatmentActual mass consumption (g)Actual volumetric wear loss I exp (m3)Wear coefficient k determined empiricallyWear coefficient k used in the Archard wear modelTheoretical volumetric wear loss I Z (m3)Relative difference (%)
10.22362.84841 × 10⁻⁸0.0098800.0102723.00644 × 10⁻⁸+5.55
20.2182.77707 × 10⁻⁸0.0106660.0102722.71511 × 10⁻⁸−2.23
30.238842.97898 × 10⁻⁸0.0115780.0102722.76135 × 10⁻⁸−7.32
40.233853.04255 × 10⁻⁸0.0114900.0102722.68310 × 10⁻⁸−11.82
50.252723.21936 × 10⁻⁸0.0092380.0102723.63384 × 10⁻⁸+12.87
60.257223.27669 × 10⁻⁸0.0087810.0102723.89106 × 10⁻⁸+18.72
70.291043.70752 × 10⁻⁸0.0073910.0057872.90297 × 10⁻⁸−21.69
80.295433.76348 × 10⁻⁸0.0054000.0057874.03325 × 10⁻⁸+7.17
90.33714.29427 × 10⁻⁸0.0045700.0057875.43758 × 10⁻⁸+26.59

Chemical composition of Hardox 500 steel (in % by weight)_

CMnSiPSCrNiMoVCuAlTiNbB
0.290.740.280.0070.0010.610.060.0180.0120.0100.0540.0030.0009

Results of variance analysis_

Effect SSEffect dfEffect MSError SSError dfError MS F p
R a 0.107280.01340.1407180.00781.71400.1629
R p 0.991180.12394.6533180.25850.47920.8551
R v 4.483180.56043.9031180.21682.58440.0450

Results of Duncan’s test for the parameter R v_

State of heat treatment{1} M = 1.6167{2} M = 2.0367{3} M = 2.2233{4} M = 2.0000{5} M = 1.8600{6} M = 2.2733{7} M = 3.0667{8} M = 1.7867{9} M = 1.7533
{1} 0.33840.17590.37590.56510.14700.00340.67800.7236
{2}0.3384 0.62950.92430.66620.56400.02150.55450.5109
{3}0.17590.6295 0.58600.39240.89700.04880.31460.2855
{4}0.37590.92430.5860 0.71710.51850.01970.60280.5598
{5}0.56510.66620.39240.7171 0.34050.01030.84930.7944
{6}0.14700.56400.89700.51850.3405 0.05160.26940.2426
{7}0.00340.02150.04880.01970.01030.0516 0.00750.0067
{8}0.67800.55450.31460.60280.84930.26940.0075 0.9312
{9}0.72360.51090.28550.55980.79440.24260.00670.9312

Results of Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance_

Effect SSEffect dfEffect MSError SSError dfError MS F p
Mass wear per 1 m of sliding distance0.00268480.0003350.003295310.0001063.1563350.00987

Parameters of the applied heat treatment procedures_

NoHeat treatment parameters
1As-delivered condition from the steel mill
2Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 880°C, 20 min and cooling in H2O (∼270°C/s)
Tempering: 100°C, 120 min, and air cooling
3Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 900°C, 20 min and cooling in transformer oil (∼25°C/s)
Tempering: 100°C, 120 min, and air cooling
4Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 900°C, 20 min and cooling in Durixol W72 (∼100°C/s)
Tempering: 100°C, 120 min, and air cooling
5Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 900°C, 20 min, and cooling with 5 bar air blast (∼5°C/s)
Tempering: 100°C, 120 min, and air cooling
6Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 900°C, 20 min, and cooling with 3 bar air blast (∼3°C/s)
Tempering: 100°C, 120 min, and air cooling
7Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 900°C and 20 min cooling with 1 bar air blast (∼1°C/s)
Tempering: 100°C, 120 min, and air cooling
8Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 900°C, 20 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
9Normalization: 880°C, 30 min, and air cooling (∼0.1°C/s)
Quenching: austenitization at 900°C, 20 min, and furnace cooling (∼0.01°C/s)

Results of Duncan’s test_

State of heat treatment{1} M = 0.7908{2} M = 0.7911{3} M = 0.8231{4} M = 0.8388{5} M = 0.8838{6} M = 0.9098{7} M = 1.0293{8} M = 1.0449{9} M = 1.1922
1 0.98670.05950.00750.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000
20.9867 0.04990.00640.00010.00000.00000.00000.0000
30.05950.0499 0.32350.00080.00010.00000.00000.0000
40.00750.00640.3235 0.00740.00020.00010.00000.0000
50.00000.00010.00080.0074 0.10880.00010.00010.0000
60.00000.00000.00010.00020.1088 0.00010.00010.0001
70.00000.00000.00000.00010.00010.0001 0.32920.0001
80.00000.00000.00000.00000.00010.00010.3292 0.0001
90.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00010.00010.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2025-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 173 - 195
Submitted on: Mar 23, 2025
|
Accepted on: May 28, 2025
|
Published on: Mar 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Martyna Zemlik, Beata Bialobrzeska, Mateusz Stachowicz, Lukasz Konat, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.