Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Additive manufacturing with geopolymer foams: A critical review of current progress Cover

Additive manufacturing with geopolymer foams: A critical review of current progress

Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Chen, C., Xu, R., Tong, D., Qin, X., Cheng, J., Liu, J., et al., A striking growth of CO2 emissions from the global cement industry driven by new facilities in emerging countries, Environ. Res. Lett., 2022, 17(4): 044007. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac48b5
  2. He, Z., Zhu, X., Wang, J., Mu, M., Wang, Y., Comparison of CO2 emissions from OPC and recycled cement production, Constr. Build. Mater., 2019, 211: 965–973. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.289
  3. Zhang, Z., Provis, J.L., Reid, A., Wang, H., Geopolymer foam concrete: An emerging material for sustainable construction, Constr. Build. Mater., 2014, 56: 113–127. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081
  4. Alves, L.A., Nogueira, A., Vazquez, E., De Barros, S., A bibliographic historical analysis on geopolymer as a substitute for Portland cement, KEM, 2020, 834: 127–131. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.834.127
  5. Davidovits, J., Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials, J. Therm. Anal., 1989, 35(2): 429–441. 10.1007/BF01904446
  6. Davidovits, J., Geopolymer cement a review, published in geopolymer science and technics, Tech. Pap., 2013, 21: 1–11
  7. Aslan, S., Erkan, İ.H., The effects of fly ash, blast furnace slag, and limestone powder on the physical and mechanical properties of geopolymer mortar, Appl. Sci., 2024, 14(2): 553. 10.3390/app14020553
  8. Zhang, H.Y., Kodur, V., Qi, S.L., Cao, L., Wu, B., Development of metakaolin–fly ash based geopolymers for fire resistance applications, Constr. Build. Mater., 2014, 55: 38–45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.040
  9. Bleszynski, R., Hooton, R.D., Thomas, M.D., Rogers, C.A., Durability of ternary blend concrete with silica fume and blast-furnace slag: laboratory and outdoor exposure site studies, ACI Mater. J.-Am. Concr. Inst., 2002, 99(5): 499–508. 10.14359/12329
  10. Mayhoub, O.A., Nasr, E.S.A., Ali, Y., Kohail, M., Properties of slag based geopolymer reactive powder concrete, Ain Shams Eng. J., 2021, 12(1): 99–105. 10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.013
  11. Liu, Y.L., Liu, C., Qian, L.P., Wang, A.G., Sun, D.S., Guo, D., Foaming processes and properties of geopolymer foam concrete: Effect of the activator, Constr. Build. Mater., 2023, 391: 131830. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131830
  12. Wang, X., Cui, H., Zhou, H., Song, T., Zhang, H., Liu, H., et al., Mechanical properties and energy absorption performance of foamed geopolymer under quasi-static and dynamic compression, Constr. Build. Mater., 2023, 404: 133296. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133296
  13. Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Li, X., Tian, D., Ma, M., Wang, T., Optimized pore structure and high permeability of metakaolin/fly-ash-based geopolymer foams from Al– and H2O2–sodium oleate foaming systems, Ceram. Int., 2022, 48(13): 18348–18360. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.094
  14. Le, V.S., Louda, P., Tran, H.N., Nguyen, P.D., Bakalova, T., Ewa Buczkowska, K., et al., Study on temperature-dependent properties and fire resistance of metakaolin-based geopolymer foams, Polymers, 2020, 12(12): 2994. 10.3390/polym12122994
  15. Wang, Z., Liu, S., Wu, K., Li, M., Zhang, X., Huang, L., Durability against dry–wet and freeze–thaw cycles of alkali residue-based foamed concrete, Mater. Struct., 2024, 57(3): 51. 10.1617/s11527-024-02318-w
  16. Dhasindrakrishna, K., Pasupathy, K., Ramakrishnan, S., Sanjayan, J., Progress, current thinking and challenges in geopolymer foam concrete technology, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2021, 116: 103886. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103886
  17. Alghamdi, H., Neithalath, N., Synthesis and characterization of 3D-printable geopolymeric foams for thermally efficient building envelope materials, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2019, 104: 103377. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103377
  18. Gosselin, C., Duballet, R., Roux, P., Gaudillière, N., Dirrenberger, J., Morel, P., Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete – a new processing route for architects and builders, Mater. Des., 2016, 100: 102–109. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097
  19. Bedarf, P., Szabo, A., Zanini, M., Dillenburger, B., Robotic 3D printing of geopolymer foam for lightweight and insulating building elements, 3D Print. Addit. Manuf., 2024, 11(1): 1–9. 10.1089/3dp.2023.0183
  20. Novais, R.M., Pullar, R.C., Labrincha, J.A., Geopolymer foams: An overview of recent advancements, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2020, 109: 100621. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100621
  21. Bedarf, P., Dutto, A., Zanini, M., Dillenburger, B., Foam 3D printing for construction: A review of applications, materials, and processes, Autom. Constr., 2021, 130: 103861. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103861
  22. Ismail, A.H., Kusbiantoro, A., Tajunnisa, Y., Ekaputrc, J.J., Laory, I., A review of aluminosilicate sources from inorganic waste for geopolymer production: Sustainable approach for hydrocarbon waste disposal, Clean. Mater., 2024, 13: 100259. 10.1016/j.clema.2024.100259
  23. Davidovits, J., Inorganic polymeric new materials. J. Therm. Anal., 1991, 37: 1633–1656
  24. Wang, Y.S., Alrefaei, Y., Dai, J.G., Silico-aluminophosphate and alkali-aluminosilicate geopolymers: a comparative review, Front. Mater., 2019, 6: 106. 10.3389/fmats.2019.00106
  25. Zhuang, X.Y., Chen, L., Komarneni, S., Zhou, C.H., Tong, D.S., Yang, H.M., et al., Fly ash-based geopolymer: clean production, properties and applications, J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 125: 253–267. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019
  26. Papa, E., Medri, V., Kpogbemabou, D., Morinière, V., Laumonier, J., Vaccari, A., et al., Porosity and insulating properties of silica-fume based foams, Energy Build., 2016, 131: 223–232. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.031
  27. Vanathi, V., Nagarajan, V., Jagadesh, P., Influence of sugarcane bagasse ash on mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete, J. Build. Eng., 2023, 79: 107836. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107836
  28. Kaur, K., Singh, J., Kaur, M., Compressive strength of rice husk ash based geopolymer: The effect of alkaline activator, Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 169: 188–192. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.200
  29. Hamada, H.M., Alattar, A.A., Yahaya, F.M., Muthusamy, K., Tayeh, B.A., Mechanical properties of semi-lightweight concrete containing nano-palm oil clinker powder, Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2021, 121: 102977. 10.1016/j.pce.2021.102977
  30. Nduka, D.O., Olawuyi, B.J., Ajao, A.M., Okoye, V.C., Okigbo, O.M., Mechanical and durability property dimensions of sustainable bamboo leaf ash in high-performance concrete, Clean. Eng. Technol., 2022, 11: 100583. 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100583
  31. Rao, F., Liu, Q., Geopolymerization and its potential application in mine tailings consolidation: a review, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev., 2015, 36(6): 399–409. 10.1080/08827508.2015.1055625
  32. Ahmari, S., Zhang, L., Durability and leaching behavior of mine tailings-based geopolymer bricks, Constr. Build. Mater., 2013, 44: 743–750. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.075
  33. Burduhos Nergis, D.D., Vizureanu, P., Sandu, A.V., Burduhos Nergis, D.P., Bejinariu, C., XRD and TG-DTA study of new phosphate-based geopolymers with coal ash or metakaolin as aluminosilicate source and mine tailings addition, Materials, 2021, 15(1): 202. 10.3390/ma15010202
  34. Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J.L., Lukey, G.C., Palomo, A., van Deventer, J.S., Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art, J. Mater. Sci., 2007, 42(9): 2917–2933, 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
  35. ASTM International. (2022). ASTM C618-22: Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, Pennsylvania. 10.1520/C0618-22
  36. McLellan, B.C., Williams, R.P., Lay, J., Van Riessen, A., Corder, G.D., Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement, J. Clean. Prod., 2011, 19(9–10): 1080–1090. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010
  37. Su, L., Fu, G., Liang, B., Sun, Q., Zhang, X., Mechanical properties and microstructure evaluation of fly ash - Slag geopolymer foaming materials, Ceram. Int., 2022, 48(13): 18224–18237. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.081
  38. Etli, S., Evaluation of the effect of silica fume on the fresh, mechanical and durability properties of self-compacting concrete produced by using waste rubber as fine aggregate, J. Clean. Prod., 2023, 384: 135590. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135590
  39. Amran, M., Debbarma, S., Ozbakkaloglu, T., Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: A critical review of the long-term durability properties, Constr. Build. Mater., 2021, 270: 121857. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857
  40. Abdollahnejad, Z., Pacheco-Torgal, F., Félix, T., Tahri, W., Aguiar, J.B., Mix design, properties and cost analysis of fly ash-based geopolymer foam, Constr. Build. Mater., 2015, 80: 18–30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.063
  41. Wang, G.C., The utilization of slag in civil infrastructure construction, Elsevier, Woodhead publishing, Duxford, UK, 2016. 10.1016/C2014-0-03995-0
  42. ASTM International. (2018). ASTM C989/C989M-18a: Specification for slag cement for use in concrete and mortars, 2013. Pennsylvania. 10.1520/C0989_C0989M-18A
  43. Khater, H.M., Effect of silica fume on the characterization of the geopolymer materials, Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng., 2013, 5(1): 12. 10.1186/2008-6695-5-12
  44. Jena, S., Panigrahi, R., Sahu, P. (2019). Effect of Silica Fume on the Properties of Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete. In B. B. Das & N. Neithalath (Eds.), Lecture notes in Civil Engineering 25. Sustainable Construction and Building Materials, Springer Nature Singapore, (pp. 145–153). 10.1007/978-981-13-3317-0_13
  45. Shakouri, S., Bayer, Ö., Erdoğan, S.T., Development of silica fume-based geopolymer foams, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 260: 120442. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120442
  46. Malkawi, A.B., Nuruddin, M.F., Fauzi, A., Almattarneh, H., Mohammed, B.S., Effects of alkaline solution on properties of the HCFA geopolymer mortars, Procedia Eng., 2016, 148: 710–717. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.581
  47. Esparham, A., Moradikhou, A.B., Jamshidi Avanaki, M., Effect of various alkaline activator solutions on compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Jcema, 2020, 4(2): 115–123. 10.22034/jcema.2020.224071.1018
  48. Ma, C., Zhao, B., Guo, S., Long, G., Xie, Y., Properties and characterization of green one-part geopolymer activated by composite activators, J. Clean. Prod., 2019, 220: 188–199. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.159
  49. Chen, B., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Effect of sodium aluminate dosage as a solid alkaline activator on the properties of alkali‐activated slag paste, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, 2021(1): 6658588. 10.1155/2021/6658588
  50. Le-Ping, L., Xue-Min, C., Shu-Heng, Q., Jun-Li, Y., Lin, Z., Preparation of phosphoric acid-based porous geopolymers, Appl. Clay Sci., 2010, 50(4): 600–603. 10.1016/j.clay.2010.10.004
  51. Zhang, B., Guo, H., Yuan, P., Deng, L., Zhong, X., Li, Y., et al., Novel acid-based geopolymer synthesized from nanosized tubular halloysite: The role of precalcination temperature and phosphoric acid concentration, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2020, 110: 103601. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103601
  52. Pu, S., Zhu, Z., Song, W., Huo, W., Zhang, J., Mechanical and microscopic properties of fly ash phosphoric acid-based geopolymer paste: A comprehensive study, Constr. Build. Mater., 2021, 299: 123947. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123947
  53. Lin, H., Liu, H., Li, Y., Kong, X., Properties and reaction mechanism of phosphoric acid activated metakaolin geopolymer at varied curing temperatures, Cem. Concr. Res., 2021, 144: 106425. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106425
  54. Song, Y., Xue, C., Guo, W., Bai, Y., Shi, Y., Zhao, Q., Foamed geopolymer insulation materials: Research progress on insulation performance and durability, J. Clean. Prod., 2024, 444: 140991. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140991
  55. Kočí, V., Černý, R., Directly foamed geopolymers: A review of recent studies, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2022, 130: 104530. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104530
  56. Huang, Z., Zhang, T., Wen, Z., Proportioning and characterization of Portland cement-based ultra-lightweight foam concretes, Constr. Build. Mater., 2015, 79: 390–396. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.051
  57. Medri, V., Papa, E., Dedecek, J., Jirglova, H., Benito, P., Vaccari, A., et al., Effect of metallic Si addition on polymerization degree of in situ foamed alkali-aluminosilicates, Ceram. Int., 2013, 39(7): 7657–7668. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.104
  58. Gualtieri, M.L., Cavallini, A., Romagnoli, M., Interactive powder mixture concept for the preparation of geopolymers with fine porosity, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2016, 36(10): 2641–2646. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.03.030
  59. Pantongsuk, T., Kittisayarm, P., Muenglue, N., Benjawan, S., Thavorniti, P., Tippayasam, C., et al., Effect of hydrogen peroxide and bagasse ash additions on thermal conductivity and thermal resistance of geopolymer foams, Mater. Today Commun., 2021, 26: 102149. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102149
  60. Huang, Y., Gong, L., Shi, L., Cao, W., Pan, Y., Cheng, X., Experimental investigation on the influencing factors of preparing porous fly ash-based geopolymer for insulation material, Energy Build., 2018, 168: 9–18. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.02.043
  61. Yan, S., Zhang, F., Liu, J., Ren, B., He, P., Jia, D., et al., Green synthesis of high porosity waste gangue microsphere/geopolymer composite foams via hydrogen peroxide modification, J. Clean. Prod., 2019, 227: 483–494. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.185
  62. Novais, R.M., Ascensão, G., Ferreira, N., Seabra, M.P., Labrincha, J.A., Influence of water and aluminium powder content on the properties of waste-containing geopolymer foams, Ceram. Int., 2018, 44(6): 6242–6249. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.009
  63. Hajimohammadi, A., Ngo, T., Mendis, P., How does aluminium foaming agent impact the geopolymer formation mechanism?, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2017, 80: 277–286. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.022
  64. Anggarini, U., Pratapa, S., Purnomo, V., Sukmana, N.C., A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis, Open. Chem., 2019, 17(1): 629–638. 10.1515/chem-2019-0073
  65. Łach, M., Pławecka, K., Bąk, A., Lichocka, K., Korniejenko, K., Cheng, A., et al., Determination of the influence of hydraulic additives on the foaming process and stability of the produced geopolymer foams, Materials, 2021, 14(17): 5090. 10.3390/ma14175090
  66. Bai, C., Colombo, P., High-porosity geopolymer membrane supports by peroxide route with the addition of egg white as surfactant, Ceram. Int., 2017, 43(2): 2267–2273. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.10.205
  67. Bai, C., Ni, T., Wang, Q., Li, H., Colombo, P., Porosity, mechanical and insulating properties of geopolymer foams using vegetable oil as the stabilizing agent, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2018, 38(2): 799–805. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.021
  68. Korat, L., Ducman, V., The influence of the stabilizing agent SDS on porosity development in alkali-activated fly-ash based foams, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2017, 80: 168–174. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.03.010
  69. Liu, Z., Shao, N.N., Qin, J.F., Kong, F.L., Wang, C.X, Wang, D.M., Strength and thermal behavior of low weight foam geopolymer using circulating fluidized bed combustion fly ash, J. Cent. South. Univ., 2015, 22(9): 3633–3640. 10.1007/s11771-015-2904-0
  70. Masi, G., Rickard, W.D., Vickers, L., Bignozzi, M.C., Van Riessen, A., A comparison between different foaming methods for the synthesis of light weight geopolymers, Ceram. Int., 2014, 40(9): 13891–13902. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.05.108
  71. Guo, S., Wang, W., Jia, Z., Qi, X., Zhu, H., Liu, X., Nanoparticle-stabilized foam with controllable structure for enhanced foamed concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 2023, 362: 129723. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129723
  72. Tiyasangthong, S., Yoosuk, P., Krosoongnern, K., Krittacom, B., Nachaisit, P., Suksiripattanapong, C., Unit weight, strengths and thermal conductivity of cellular lightweight fly ash geopolymer mortar reinforced with polyvinyl alcohol, Civ. Eng. Archit., 2022, 10(7): 2943–2952. 10.13189/cea.2022.100713
  73. Nodehi, M., A comparative review on foam-based versus lightweight aggregate-based alkali-activated materials and geopolymer, Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., 2021, 6(4): 231. 10.1007/s41062-021-00595-w
  74. Liu, M.Y.J., Alengaram, U.J., Jumaat, M.Z., Mo, K.H., Evaluation of thermal conductivity, mechanical and transport properties of lightweight aggregate foamed geopolymer concrete, Energy Build., 2014, 72: 238–245. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.12.029
  75. Pasupathy, K., Ramakrishnan, S., Sanjayan, J., Enhancing the mechanical and thermal properties of aerated geopolymer concrete using porous lightweight aggregates, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 264: 120713. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120713
  76. Wang, J., Li, X., Hu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, P., Zhao, Y., Physical and high temperature properties of basalt fiber-reinforced geopolymer foam with hollow microspheres, Constr. Build. Mater., 2024, 411: 134698. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134698
  77. Zhang, N., Wang, B., Yue, D., Pan, D., Wang, H., Li, J., et al., Waste liquid-added regeneration activator to enhance the pore structure and compressive strength of geopolymer-foam-fiber: A sustainable strategy of kenaf fiber pretreatment and reuse, Process. Saf. Environ. Prot., 2023, 170: 536–544. 10.1016/j.psep.2022.12.011
  78. Wang, Y., Zheng, T., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., Darkwa, J., Zhou, G., Thermo-mechanical and moisture absorption properties of fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer concrete reinforced by polypropylene fibers, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 251: 118960. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118960
  79. Mackenzie, K.J.D., Welter, M., Geopolymer (aluminosilicate) composites: synthesis, properties and applications, In Advances in Ceramic Matrix Composites, Elsevier, Woodhead publishing, Cambridge, UK, 2014, pp. 445–470. 10.1533/9780857098825.3.445
  80. Xu, H., Van Deventer, J.S.J., The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2000, 59(3): 247–266. 10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5
  81. Li, T., Huang, F., Zhu, J., Tang, J., Liu, J., Effect of foaming gas and cement type on the thermal conductivity of foamed concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 231: 117197. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117197
  82. Bai, C., Colombo, P., Processing, properties and applications of highly porous geopolymers: A review, Ceram. Int., 2018, 44(14): 16103–16118. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.219
  83. Sharma, S., Medpelli, D., Chen, S., Seo, D.K., Calcium-modified hierarchically porous aluminosilicate geopolymer as a highly efficient regenerable catalyst for biodiesel production, RSC Adv., 2015, 5(80): 65454–65461. 10.1039/C5RA01823D
  84. Zhang, Z., Provis, J.L., Reid, A., Wang, H., Mechanical, thermal insulation, thermal resistance and acoustic absorption properties of geopolymer foam concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2015, 62: 97–105. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.03.013
  85. Franchin, G., Scanferla, P., Zeffiro, L., Elsayed, H., Baliello, A., Giacomello, G., et al., Direct ink writing of geopolymeric inks, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2017, 37(6): 2481–2489. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.01.030
  86. Barve, P., Bahrami, A., Shah, S., Geopolymer 3D printing: a comprehensive review on rheological and structural performance assessment, printing process parameters, and microstructure, Front. Mater., 2023, 10: 1241869. 10.3389/fmats.2023.1241869
  87. Muthukrishnan, S., Ramakrishnan, S., Sanjayan, J., Effect of microwave heating on interlayer bonding and buildability of geopolymer 3D concrete printing, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 265: 120786. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120786
  88. Wu, Y., Wang, J.Y., Monteiro, P.J., Zhang, M.H., Development of ultra-lightweight cement composites with low thermal conductivity and high specific strength for energy efficient buildings, Constr. Build. Mater., 2015, 87: 100–112. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.04.004
  89. Góra, M., Bańkosz, M., Tyliszczak, B., Use of innovative methods to produce highly insulating walls using 3D-printing technology, Materials, 2024, 17(16): 3990. 10.3390/ma17163990
  90. Ziejewska, C., Marczyk, J., Korniejenko, K., Bednarz, S., Sroczyk, P., et al., 3D printing of concrete-geopolymer hybrids, Materials, 2022, 15(8): 2819. 10.3390/ma15082819
  91. Zoude, C., Gremillard, L., Prud’Homme, E., Combination of chemical foaming and direct ink writing for lightweight geopolymers, Open. Ceram., 2023, 16: 100478. 10.1016/j.oceram.2023.100478
  92. Ma, S., Jiang, Y., Fu, S., He, P., Sun, C., Duan, X., et al., 3D-printed Lunar regolith simulant-based geopolymer composites with bio-inspired sandwich architectures, J. Adv. Ceram., 2023, 12(3): 510–525. 10.26599/JAC.2023.9220700
  93. Ulubeyli, S., Lunar shelter construction issues: The state-of-the-art towards 3D printing technologies, Acta Astronaut., 2022, 195: 318–343. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.033
  94. Xu, F., Gu, G., Zhang, W., Wang, H., Huang, X., Zhu, J., Pore structure analysis and properties evaluations of fly ash-based geopolymer foams by chemical foaming method, Ceram. Int., 2018, 44(16): 19989–19997. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.267
  95. Petlitckaia, S., Poulesquen, A., Design of lightweight metakaolin based geopolymer foamed with hydrogen peroxide, Ceram. Int., 2019, 45(1): 1322–1330. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.10.021
  96. Sanjayan, J.G., Nazari, A., Chen, L., Nguyen, G.H., Physical and mechanical properties of lightweight aerated geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater., 2015, 79: 236–244. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.043
  97. Jaya, N.A., Yun-Ming, L., Cheng-Yong, H., Abdullah, M.M.A.B., Hussin, K., Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 247: 118641. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118641
  98. Luna-Galiano, Y., Leiva, C., Arenas, C., Fernández-Pereira, C., Fly ash based geopolymeric foams using silica fume as pore generation agent. Physical, mechanical and acoustic properties, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 2018, 500: 196–204. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.07.069
  99. Hajimohammadi, A., Ngo, T., Mendis, P., Sanjayan, J., Regulating the chemical foaming reaction to control the porosity of geopolymer foams, Mater. Des., 2017, 120: 255–265. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.026
  100. Senff, L., Novais, R.M., Carvalheiras, J., Labrincha, J.A., Eco-friendly approach to enhance the mechanical performance of geopolymer foams: Using glass fibre waste coming from wind blade production, Constr. Build. Mater., 2020, 239: 117805. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117805
  101. Ducman, V., Korat, L., Characterization of geopolymer fly-ash based foams obtained with the addition of Al powder or H2O2 as foaming agents, Mater. Charact., 2016, 113: 207–213. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.01.019
  102. Shen, S., Tian, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, X., Hu, P., Synthesis of industrial solid wastes based geopolymer foams for building energy conservation: Effects of metallic aluminium and reclaimed materials, Constr. Build. Mater., 2022, 328: 127083. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127083
  103. Bai, C., Zheng, J., Rizzi, G.A., Colombo, P., Low-temperature fabrication of SiC/geopolymer cellular composites, Compos. Part. B: Eng., 2018, 137: 23–30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.11.013
  104. Peng, X., Li, H., Shuai, Q., Wang, L., Fire resistance of alkali activated geopolymer foams produced from metakaolin and Na2O2. Materials, 2020, 13(3): 535. 10.3390/ma13030535
  105. Feng, J., Zhang, R., Gong, L., Li, Y., Cao, W., Cheng, X., Development of porous fly ash-based geopolymer with low thermal conductivity, Mater. Des. (1980-2015), 2015, 65: 529–533. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.024
  106. Pasupathy, K., Ramakrishnan, S., Sanjayan, J., Influence of recycled concrete aggregate on the foam stability of aerated geopolymer concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 2021, 271: 121850. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121850
  107. Sornlar, W., Wannagon, A., Supothina, S., Stabilized homogeneous porous structure and pore type effects on the properties of lightweight kaolinite-based geopolymers, J. Build. Eng., 2021, 44: 103273. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103273
  108. Cui, Y., Wang, D., Zhao, J., Li, D., Ng, S., Rui, Y., Effect of calcium stearate based foam stabilizer on pore characteristics and thermal conductivity of geopolymer foam material, J. Build. Eng., 2018, 20: 21–29. 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.06.002
  109. Cui, Y., Wang, D., Effects of water on pore structure and thermal conductivity of fly ash-based foam geopolymers, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2019, 2019: 1–10. 10.1155/2019/3202794
  110. Shao, N.N., Zhang, Y.B., Liu, Z., Wang, D.M., Zhang, Z.T., Fabrication of hollow microspheres filled fly ash based foam geopolymers with ultra-low thermal conductivity and relative high strength, Constr. Build. Mater., 2018, 185: 567–573. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.077
  111. Wongkvanklom, A., Posi, P., Kasemsiri, P., Sata, V., Cao, T., Chindaprasirt, P., Strength, thermal conductivity and sound absorption of cellular lightweight high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete, Eng. Appl. Sci. Res., 2021, 48: 487496. 10.14456/EASR.2021.51
  112. Bai, C., Franchin, G., Elsayed, H., Zaggia, A., Conte, L., Li, H., et al., High-porosity geopolymer foams with tailored porosity for thermal insulation and wastewater treatment, J. Mater. Res., 2017, 32(17): 3251–3259. 10.1557/jmr.2017.127
  113. Shilar, F.A., Ganachari, S.V., Patil, V.B., Bhojaraja, B.E., Khan, T.Y., Almakayeel, N., A review of 3D printing of geopolymer composites for structural and functional applications, Constr. Build. Mater., 2023, 400: 132869. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132869
  114. Lazorenko, G., Kasprzhitskii, A., Geopolymer additive manufacturing: A review, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 55: 102782. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102782
  115. Raza, M.H., Zhong, R.Y., Khan, M., Recent advances and productivity analysis of 3D printed geopolymers, Addit. Manuf., 2022, 52, 102685. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102685
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2025-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X (formerly 2083-124X) | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 132
Submitted on: Mar 13, 2025
Accepted on: May 13, 2025
Published on: Mar 31, 2025
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Wei-Chien Wang, Melati Sari Dewi, Wei-Ting Lin, Marek Hebda, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.