Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Shear and flexural strength of reinforced concrete beams made with recycled coarse aggregate concrete Cover

Shear and flexural strength of reinforced concrete beams made with recycled coarse aggregate concrete

Open Access
|Sep 2024

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

RAC50-3 specimen details: (a) longitudinal-section and (b) cross-section [26]
RAC50-3 specimen details: (a) longitudinal-section and (b) cross-section [26]

Fig. 2.

H50-100 specimen details: (a) longitudinal-section and (b) cross-section [15]
H50-100 specimen details: (a) longitudinal-section and (b) cross-section [15]

Fig. 3.

Stress–strain curve equations for the concrete’s compression behavior [34]
Stress–strain curve equations for the concrete’s compression behavior [34]

Fig. 4.

Concrete’s tension behavior
Concrete’s tension behavior

Fig. 5.

Idealized curve of the reinforcement bars
Idealized curve of the reinforcement bars

Fig. 6.

Constraints and interactions of tested specimens: (a) Rigid bodies, (b) Tie contact, and (c) Embedded constraints
Constraints and interactions of tested specimens: (a) Rigid bodies, (b) Tie contact, and (c) Embedded constraints

Fig. 7.

Boundary conditions and applied loads
Boundary conditions and applied loads

Fig. 8.

FE mesh sensitivity results
FE mesh sensitivity results

Fig. 9.

Experimental and FE load-deflection curves of beam RAC50-3
Experimental and FE load-deflection curves of beam RAC50-3

Fig. 10.

Experimental and FE bending moment–deflection curves of beam H50-100
Experimental and FE bending moment–deflection curves of beam H50-100

Fig. 11.

Load–deflection relationships for beams with different RCA ratios
Load–deflection relationships for beams with different RCA ratios

Fig. 12.

Load–deflection relationships for beams with different concrete strengths
Load–deflection relationships for beams with different concrete strengths

Fig. 13.

Load–deflection relationships for beams with different RCA ratios
Load–deflection relationships for beams with different RCA ratios

Fig. 14.

Load–deflection relationships for beams with different concrete strengths
Load–deflection relationships for beams with different concrete strengths

Fig. 15.

Load–deflection relationships for beams with different reinforcement rebars
Load–deflection relationships for beams with different reinforcement rebars

Fig. 16.

Relationship between the ratio of shear from test or FE to shear from the ACI318-19 and SBC304-18 codes and percent of RCA
Relationship between the ratio of shear from test or FE to shear from the ACI318-19 and SBC304-18 codes and percent of RCA

Fig. 17.

Relationship between the ratio of shear from the test or FE to shear from the ECP203-2020 codes and the percent of RCA
Relationship between the ratio of shear from the test or FE to shear from the ECP203-2020 codes and the percent of RCA

Fig. 18.

Relationship between the ratio of moment capacity from the test or FE to moment capacity from the ACI318-19 and SBC304-18 codes and the percent of RCA
Relationship between the ratio of moment capacity from the test or FE to moment capacity from the ACI318-19 and SBC304-18 codes and the percent of RCA

Fig. 19.

Relationship between the ratio of moment capacity from the test or FE to moment capacity from the ECP203-2020 codes and the percent of RCA
Relationship between the ratio of moment capacity from the test or FE to moment capacity from the ECP203-2020 codes and the percent of RCA

CDPM parameters utilized in this study

Parameters Dilation angle (ψ) Stress ratio (fb0/fc0)Compressive meridian (Kc)Eccentricity (ε)Viscosity (μ)
Value27 (calibrated value)1.16 (default value [20])0.667 (default value [20])0.1 (default value [20])0.001 default value [20])

Details of the FE analysis matrix

ScenariosSpecimen IDRCA ratioConcrete strengthsMain rebar diameterNo. of specimens
Beams Failing in FlexuralF-0-18-(25/35/40)0%25/35/40 MPa2T18 mm3
F-25-18-(25/35/40)25% 3
F-50-18-(25/35/40)50% 3
F-75-18-(25/35/40)75% 3
F-100-18-(25/35/40)100% 3
F-0-16-(25/35/40)0%25/35/40 MPa2T16 mm3
F-25-16-(25/35/40)25% 3
F-50-16-(25/35/40)50% 3
F-75-16-(25/35/40)75% 3
F-100-16-(25/35/40)100% 3
F-0-14-(25/35/40)0%25/35/40 MPa2T14 mm3
F-25-14-(25/35/40)25% 3
F-50-14-(25/35/40)50% 3
F-75-14-(25/35/40)75% 3
F-100-14-(25/35/40)100% 3
Beams Failing in ShearS-0-150-(25/35/40)0%25/35/40 MPa2T16 + 4T223
S-25-150-(25/35/40)25% 3
S-50-150-(25/35/40)50% 3
S-75-150-(25/35/40)75% 3
S-100-150-(25/35/40)100% 3
Total Number of Specimens60
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2024-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 160 - 177
Submitted on: Mar 20, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 14, 2024
Published on: Sep 20, 2024
Published by: Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Hassan M. Magbool, Mohamed Gamil, Mohamed S. Issa, Ahmed A. El-Abbasy, published by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.