Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 11.

Comparative analysis of sensor performance and preparation processes based on In2O3 sensing materials
| Sensor materials | Fabrication method | Operating temperature (°C) | Response/ppm | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SnO2/In2O3 | Thermal evaporation | 300 | 1.05/100 | [29] |
| In2O3 microsphere | Solvothermal method | 250 | 36/20 | [30] |
| In2O3 | facile solution route | 260 | 8.60/100 | [31] |
| Bi2O3/ In2O3 | one-step process | 200 | 17.7/200 | [32] |
| Co3O4 | electrospinning | 200 | 1.71/40 | This work |
| In2O3 | electrospinning | 200 | 7/40 | This work |
| In2O3/Co3O4-3 | Double-jet electrospinning | 200 | 9.5/40 | This work |