Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of short aramid fiber on thermoplastic polymers Cover

Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties of short aramid fiber on thermoplastic polymers

Open Access
|Aug 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Press molding production parameters
Press molding production parameters

Fig. 2.

Tensile test results of composites
Tensile test results of composites

Fig. 3.

Fiber efficiency factor in composites
Fiber efficiency factor in composites

Fig. 4.

SEM images of 30 vol% AF reinforced composite surfaces: (a) PP matrix, (b) PE matrix, (c) PA6 matrix, (d) PA12 matrix
SEM images of 30 vol% AF reinforced composite surfaces: (a) PP matrix, (b) PE matrix, (c) PA6 matrix, (d) PA12 matrix

Fig. 5.

SEM images of fractured surfaces of 30 vol% AF-reinforced composites (a) PP matrix, (b) PE matrix, (c) PA6 matrix, (d) PA12 matrix
SEM images of fractured surfaces of 30 vol% AF-reinforced composites (a) PP matrix, (b) PE matrix, (c) PA6 matrix, (d) PA12 matrix

Fig. 6.

Three-point bending test results of the composites
Three-point bending test results of the composites

Fig. 7.

Drop weight impact test results of the composites
Drop weight impact test results of the composites

Fig. 8.

SEM images of fractured surfaces of 30% AF reinforced composites (a) PP matrix, (b) PE matrix, (c) PA6 matrix, (d) PA12 matrix
SEM images of fractured surfaces of 30% AF reinforced composites (a) PP matrix, (b) PE matrix, (c) PA6 matrix, (d) PA12 matrix

Fig. 9.

Hardness test results of the composites
Hardness test results of the composites

Fig. 10.

(a) S/N ratios for tensile strength, (b) S/N ratio for flexural strength, (c) S/N ratio for dropped weight, (d) S/N ratio for hardness-shore D
(a) S/N ratios for tensile strength, (b) S/N ratio for flexural strength, (c) S/N ratio for dropped weight, (d) S/N ratio for hardness-shore D

Fig. 11.

Scatter diagrams for assessing the generated regression equations for mechanical properties of composites
Scatter diagrams for assessing the generated regression equations for mechanical properties of composites

Results of ANOVA

For Tensile Test
S/N ratio: 35.75Average S/N Values
Degrees of FreedomLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Sum of SquaresVarianceFContent of Contribution (%)
A-Matrix Type334.8730.8441.8638.00262.4487.4884.7773.68
B-Fiber volume fraction %332.8335.8137.7339.2090.6730.2229.2925.45
Error8 8.261.03 0.87
Total14 361.36118.73
For Three-Point Bend Test
S/N ratio: 35.07Average S/N Values
Degrees of FreedomLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 3Sum of SquaresVarianceFContent of Contribution (%)
A-Matrix Type332.6429.8639.3438.44250.5483.51346.591.56
B-Fiber volume fraction %333.4534.5635.6736.6022.387.4630.948.18
Error8 1.930.24 0.26
Total14 274.8491.21
For Drop Weight Test
S/N ratio: 59.97Average S/N Values
Degrees of FreedomLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Sum of SquaresVarianceFContent of Contribution (%)
A-Matrix Type357.6859.7663.0659.3660.8420.2825.4758.62
B-Fiber volume fraction %357.7259.6660.3362.1740.5613.5216.9839.08
Error8 6.370.80 2.30
Total14 107.7734.60
Hardness Test
S/N ratio: 36.44Average S/N Values
Degrees of FreedomLevel 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Sum of SquaresVarianceFContent of Contribution (%)
A-Matrix Type336.8035.0337.2736.6611.413.8073.5880.25
B-Fiber volume fraction %335.7536.5536.6836.782.650.8817.1118.66
Error8 0.410.05 1.09
Total14 14.484.74

Experimental design

Experiment No.A-Matrix TypeB-Fiber volume fraction %
111
221
331
441
512
613
714
822
923
1024
1132
1233
1334
1442
1543
1644

S/N ratios of experimental results

Experiment NoTensile strength (MPa)S/NFlexural strength (MPa)S/NMaximum force in drop weight (N)S/NHardness Shore DS/N
13831.603230.10580.4655.286536.26
21925.582728.63672.4856.555033.98
38538.598138.171189.2361.517036.90
46035.567036.90752.7057.536235.85
554.3934.7141.9832.46698.4356.886936.76
663.0736.0046.5833.36738.5557.377136.96
772.1637.1753.7934.611149.1061.217237.19
836.9731.3630.0229.55941.4759.485935.34
942.3332.5332.5530.251111.4060.925935.36
1049.4833.8935.5731.021274.2062.105935.43
11103.1840.2784.6538.551356.8062.657437.34
12153.2743.7198.339.851451.1063.237437.41
13174.9044.86109.340.771750.8064.867437.42
1469.9036.8976.4737.67957.9959.636936.75
1585.7338.6691.1539.20976.8659.807136.99
16110.6040.88100.140.011059.4060.507137.06

Regression equations for predicting the mechanical properties of composites

PropertyRegression Conditions W (Fiber volume fraction)P (Strength parameter)Regression Equation
TensileW1=1, W2=2,W3=3, W4=4P1=19, P2=38, P3=85,P4=60y(W, P) =1.129898 ·W0.5408653, p0.9532715
Three-point bendingW1=1, W2=2,W3=3, W4=4P1=32, P2=27, P3=81, P4=70y(W, P) =1.408406·W0.2568704·p0.9089538
Drop weightW1=1, W2=2,W3=3, W4=4P1=580.46, P2=672.48, P3=1189.23, P4=752.70y(W, P) =4.797744·W0.3307587·p0.7647516
HardnessW1=1, W2=2,W3=3, W4=4P1=65, P2=50, P3=70, P4=62y(W, P) =2.814354·W0.798804·P0.7526531

Experiment factors and levels

Factors1. Level2. Level3. Level4. Level
A-MatrixPPPEPA6PA12
Type
B-Fiber volume fraction %0*102030

Mechanical properties of materials

MaterialsDensity (kg/m3)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elastic Modulus (GPa)TypesProducers
PP0.9381.2EH251Petkim
PE0.95241High density, B00552Petkim
PA61.13852F223-DAkulon
PA121.02601.5AMN Black T6LDArkema Rilsamid
AF1.44280060Short-cut fiberTwaron

Surface energies of polymers and aramid fiber

MaterialsSurface Energy (mN/m)References
PP30–31[3336]
PE30-31[3336]
PA638[33, 35]
PA1236[33, 35, 36]
AF51[37, 38]
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2023-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2083-134X | Journal ISSN: 2083-1331
Language: English
Page range: 161 - 176
Submitted on: Jan 13, 2023
Accepted on: May 5, 2023
Published on: Aug 14, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2023 Ali Arı, Ali Bayram, Mehmet Karahan, Orhun Arslan, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.