
Figure 1.
R&D expenditure in the EU. Source: own study based on data published on the website of the National Contact Point: www.kpk.pl [accessed on 4 March 2026].

Figure 2.
Thematic areas of the Shif2Rail Programme. Source: own study based on Shift2Rail Multi-Annual Work Programme available at http://shift2rail.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/MAAP-5nal_5nal.pdf [accessed on 6 March 2026].
Table 1
Selected European and national research programmes and instruments dedicated to the railway sector in 2020–2027.
| Years | Programme | Level | Type of R&D projects | Thematic scope | Beneficiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–2023 | Horizon 2020 – Transport | EU | Industrial research, experimental development | Railway systems, interoperability, safety | International consortia |
| 2020–2023 | Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking | EU | Research, demonstration | ERTMS, automation, railway technologies | International consortia |
| 2021–2027 | Europe’s Rail Joint Undertaking | EU | Research, demonstration | Digitalisation, automation, traffic management | International consortia |
| 2020–2025 | BRIK II | PL | Industrial research, experimental development | Diagnostics, infrastructure, safety | Science– industry consortia |
| 2020–2025 | NCBR – Fast Track | PL | Industrial research, experimental development | Transport, including railway | Enterprises, consortia |
| 2020–2025 | NCBR sectoral programmes | PL | R&D, demonstration | Transport innovations | Industry, science |
Table 2
Comparison of ERJU and BRIK programme instruments in the context of R&D project management.
| Criterion | ERJU | BRIK | Managerial implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Partnership model | international | national | multi-level vs national coordination |
| Management level | international consortia | national consortia | complexity of relationships |
| Project scale | large, systemic | medium, problem-oriented | strategic vs operational |
| Formalisation | high (EU) | high (national) | higher administrative burden in EU |
| Evaluation | Excellence, Impact, Implementation | NCBR + partner | EU focus on impact |
| Funding model | reimbursement-based | grant-based + partner contribution | greater stability in BRIK |
| Funding intensity | depends on entity type | up to 100% (science) | lower risk in BRIK |
| Strategy | EU transformation | national infrastructure | long-term vs implementation-oriented |
| Risk level | high | moderate | project management approach |
| Implementation | indirect | direct | stronger implementation in BRIK |
| Institutional position | internationalisation | national | prestige vs relationships |