Figure 1.
Analysis of keywords indicated by publication authors. Drawn up in R software (n=66).
Figure 2.
Analysis of words found in publication abstracts (bigram). Drawn up in R software (n=66).
Table 1.
Occurrence of social responsibility criteria in the “declarations” of research institutes
| Criteria | Number of institutes whose statements/declarations exhibited the expected characteristics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Directly, in mission and/or vision statements | In indirect “declarations” | Total | ||
| 1 | Caring for customers/markets/external stakeholders | 12 | 1 | 13 |
| 2 | Caring for social/community and environmental factors | 13 | 4 | 17 |
| 3 | Acting on the basis of values, including those identified in the UN Sustainable Development Goals | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| TOTAL (number) | 31 | 7 | 38 | |
| TOTAL % institutes having “declarations” (67) | 46% | 10% | 58% | |
| TOTAL % of all institutes (88) | 35% | 8% | 43% | |
Figure 3.
Word cloud of the statements and “declarations” of research institutes. Drawn up in WordArt.
Table 2.
Share of words important in defining social responsibility in the “declarations” of research institutes
| Word | Institutes with the given word in their “declarations” | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of institutes | % of institutes with declarations (67) | % of all institutes (88) | |
| rozwój “development” | 26 | 39% | 30% |
| środowisko “environment” | 25 | 37% | 28% |
| nauka / naukowy “science/scientific” | 53 | 79% | 60% |