Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in the Energy Industry — Trends of Change Cover

Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in the Energy Industry — Trends of Change

Open Access
|Apr 2023

Figures & Tables

Dynamics of the amounts donated to charity by the Energa Foundation in 2011–2019

PeriodVariableVariable single indexChain index
YearAmount donated to charity (PLN)2011 = 1Previous year = 1
20113,646,979.041.00
20122,538,921.050.700.70
20132,318,226.000.640.91
20142,580,659.000.711.11
20152,411,775.000.660.93
20163,756,960.001.031.56
20174,097,949.381.121.09
20188,262,853.132.272.02
20194,571,510.121.250.55

Dynamics of the amount of blood collected during the Drop of Energy campaign in 2012–2019

PeriodVariableVariable single indexChain indexAverage rate of change over time
YearAmount of blood collected during the Drop of Energy campaign2012 = 1Previous year = 1
2012231.000.45
20131054.574.57
2014924.000.88
20151305.651.41
201624410.611.88
201727311.871.12
201834014.781.25
201930613.300.90

Dynamics of the amount of investment in communities in the form of donations of the Energa Group from 2011 to 2019

PeriodVariableVariable single indexChain index
YearAmount of investment in the community in the form of donations (PLN million)2011= 1Previous year = 1
20114.51.00
20122.40.530.53
201330.671.25
20143.10.691.03
201530.670.97
2016112.443.67
2017132.891.18
2018112.440.85
2019102.220.91

Dynamics of the volume of funds raised by Active Charity campaign from 2014 to 2021

PeriodVariableVariable single indexChain index
YearFunds raised through the Active Charity campaign (tys. zł)2014 = 1Previous year = 1
2014240100.00
2015140    0.580.58
2016150    0.631.07
2017150    0.631.00
2018350    1.462.33
2019350    1.461.00
2020200    0.830.57
2021300    1.251.50

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) — selected approaches over the years

StudyUnderstanding of CSR
Bowen (1953)
  • Commitment of companies to make policies, decisions and undertakings that reflect social expectations as the most important rationale for their activities.

Davis (1973)
  • The evaluation and response of a company to problems located outside the narrowly defined scope of economic, technical and legal requirements placed on the company.

Carroll (1979, 1991)
  • Strategies and operational practices that enhance a company’s competitiveness while improving the livelihoods of the local communities around which it operates-CSR is based on a ‘pyramid structure of corporate responsibility’, consisting of four areas of responsibility: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic.

Matten and Moon (2008)
  • Company policies and practices that reflect the responsibility of business for part of the broader social good, with the specific shape and scope of these responsibilities left to the discretion of the enterprise.

Visser (2010, 2014)
  • CSR 2.0 is the so-called fifth transformational stage in the CSR evolution model, which stems from the responsibility paradigm and manifests itself in the company’s efforts to discover and eliminate the causes of inequality and threats to sustainability by introducing innovative business models that change (revolutionise) processes, products and services.

  • Perceiving corporate responsibility from a macro perspective (the natural ecosystem as a whole, society as a whole, not just the local community).

International Standard ISO 26000
  • Responsibility of an organisation for its decisions and their impact on society and the environment through transparent and ethical behaviour that contributes to sustainable development, including the health and well-being of society, addresses stakeholder expectations, complies with applicable laws and is consistent with international standards of conduct and is integrated into the organisation’s operations and practiced in its relationships.

Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council (2014/95/EU)
  • The Directive requires certain large entities to disclose relevant non-financial and information regarding diversity to provide investors and other stakeholders with a more complete picture of their development, performance, position and impact of their operations.

Dynamics of the number of participants in the Active Charity campaign from 2014 to 2019

PeriodVariableVariable single indexChain indexAverage rate of change over time
YearNumber of participants in the Active Charity2014 = 1Previous year = 1
20142041.000.21
20154432.172.17
20164772.341.08
20175612.751.18
20186113.001.09
20195332.610.87

Availability of quantitative data describing Energa Group’s social responsibility from 2011 to 2021

Measure20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Environment
1. Share of renewable energy in the total volume of gross energy producedxxxxxxxxxxx
2. Total consumption of raw materialsxxxxxxxxx
3. Consumption of renewable raw materialsxxxxxxxxxxx
4. Total air emissions Employeesxxxxxxxxx
Employees
5. Average number of training hours per employeexxxxxxxx
6. Percentage of employees with permanent contracts among those with employment contractsxxxxxxxxxx
7. Percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements Communitiesxxxxxx
Communities
8. Amount donated to charityxxxxxxxxx
9. Funds raised through the Active Charity campaignxxxxxxxx
10. Number of participants in the Active Charity campaignxxxxxx
11. The amount of blood collected in the framework of the Drop of Energy campaignxxxxxxxx
12. Amount of investment in the community in the form of donationsxxxxxxxxx
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2023-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8414 | Journal ISSN: 2353-8503
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 48
Submitted on: Nov 18, 2022
|
Accepted on: Jan 10, 2023
|
Published on: Apr 11, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Mirosława Pluta-Olearnik, Aneta Buda, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.