Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Market Functioning of Polish Higher Education Institutions in the Context of the Implementation of the Concept of Social Responsibility Cover

The Market Functioning of Polish Higher Education Institutions in the Context of the Implementation of the Concept of Social Responsibility

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1. Alzyoud, S.A., & Bani-Hani, K. (2015). Social responsibility in higher education institutions: Application case from the Middle East. European Scientific Journal, 11(8), 122–129. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5259.
  2. 2. Babbie, E.R. (1990). Survey research methods. Wadsworth Publishing Company: Belmonton.
  3. 3. Buchat, K., Jakubiak, M., Skiert, M., & Wilczewski, A. (2018). University’s social responsibility — labour market perspective. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 18(2), 46–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2018-0018.10.2478/foli-2018-0018
  4. 4. Carroll, A. B. (1976). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850.10.2307/257850
  5. 5. Commission of the European Communities. (2001, July 19). Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility, p. 19. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/DOC_01_9 (accessed on 16th August 2019).
  6. 6. Cornelius, N., Wallace, J., & Tassabehji, R. (2007). An analysis of corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and ethics teaching in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9271-6.10.1007/s10551-006-9271-6
  7. 7. Crowther, D., & Aras, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility. Ventus Publishing ApS: Denmark. https://archive.org/details/CorporateSocialResponsibility/page/n1. (accessed 5th September 2019).
  8. 8. CSR — Finance Institute. (n.d.). H-CSR-M: Hopkins CSR/Sustainability Model: Rapid CSR/Sustainability reporting with H-CSR-M. https://www.csrfi.com/hopkinscsrmodel. (accessed on 5th September 2019).
  9. 9. Cygler, J., Sroka, W., Solesvik, M., & Dębkowska, K. (2018). Benefits and drawbacks of coopetition: The role of scope and durability in coopetitive relationships. Sustainability, 10(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082688.10.3390/su10082688
  10. 10. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132.10.1002/csr.132
  11. 11. Fundacja Rektorów Polskich. (2007). Kodeks “Dobre praktyki w szkołach wyższych.”. Konferencja Rektorów Akademickich Szkół Polskich & Fundacja Rektorów Polskich: Kraków, Poland, 1–16. https://arch.krasp.org.pl/pl/kdp/kodeks_dobre_praktyki. (accessed on 16th August 2019).
  12. 12. Giuffre, L., & Ratto, S.E. (2014, March). A new paradigm in higher education: University social responsibility (USR). Journal of Education & Human Development 3(1), 231–238. http://jehdnet.com/vol-3-no-1-march-2014-abstract-15-jehd.
  13. 13. Gourova, E., Todorova, Y., & Gourov, N. (2009). Skills for future engineers: Challenges for universities in Bulgaria. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 6, 385–399. https://www.academia.edu/25220889/Skills_for_future_engineers_challenges_for_universities_in_Bulgaria.
  14. 14. Hamidu, A.A., Haron, H.M., & Amran, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: A review on definitions, core characteristics and theoretical perspectives. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 6, 83–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83.10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83
  15. 15. Ibom, A., & Akpan, U. (2014). The survey communication research. International Journal of Education and Research 2(10), 461–478. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2014/October-2014/36.pdf.
  16. 16. KRASP. (2019). Deklaracja Społecznej Odpowiedzialności Uczelni. https://www.krasp.org.pl/resources/upload/dokumenty/prezentacje/UWMOlsztyn/P7-11dok15_Spoleczna_Odpowiedzialnosc_Uczelni.pdf (accessed on 11th August 2019).
  17. 17. Konferencja Rektorów Akademickich Szkół Polskich /KRASP/ (2019). https://www.krasp.org.pl/pl/Aktualnosci/?id=20530/KRASP_wsrod_sygnatariuszy_deklaracji_ (accessed on 16th August 2019).
  18. 18. Pabian, A. (2016). Od konwergencji sektorów poprzez konkurencję wśród polskich uczelni publicznych i niepublicznych po rozwiązania hybrydowe. Marketing i Rynek, 4, 2–10.
  19. 19. Pabian A. (2016). Rynkowa orientacja szkół wyższych w Polsce — uwarunkowania, wyznaczniki, prawidłowości. Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Biznesu w Dąbrowie Górniczej: Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland; 93–163.
  20. 20. Pabian, A.M. (2019). University social responsibility in the opinion of students. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 7(4), 101–117. DOI: 10.23762/FSO_VOL7_NO4_7.
  21. 21. Pędziwiatr, E., Czaplicka-Kotas, A., & Kulczycka, J. (2018). Działania realizowane przez szkoły wyższe w ramach społecznej odpowiedzialności — dobre praktyki. Ekonomika Społeczna, 1, 45–56. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.15678%2FES.2018.1.04.10.15678/ES.2018.1.04
  22. 22. Sawasdikosol, S. /P. Moral/ (2009). Driving universities’ collaboration toward the new era of sustainable social responsibility. Presented at the University-Community Engagement Conference, 23–26 November 2009, Penang, Malaysia. http://www.globalusrnetwork.org/resources/Driving_Universities.pdf (accessed on 3rd September 2019).
  23. 23. Statistics Poland, Statistical O?ce in Gdańsk. (2018). Higher education institutions and their finances in 2017; Statistics Poland, Statistical O?ce in Gdańsk: Warszawa, Gdańsk, Poland, 299–320.
  24. 24. Tetřevová, L., & Sabolová, V. (2010). University Stakeholder Management and University Social Responsibility. WSEAS transactions on advances in engineering education, 7(7), 224–233. http://www.wseas.us/e-library/transactions/education/2010/88-330.pdf.
  25. 25. European University Association. (2007, April 13). The Lisbon Declaration. Europe’s Universities beyond 2010: Diversity with a Common Purpose. https://bmbwf.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Bologna_Grundsatzdok/Von_Bergen_bis_London/EUA_Lisbon_declaration_Mai_07.pdf (accessed on 15th August 2019).
  26. 26. Tien, H.T. (2014). What is the difference between CSR1, CSR2, CSR3 and CSR4? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261133486_What_is_the_difference_between_CSR1_CSR2_CSR3_and_CSR4 (accessed on 5th September 2019).
  27. 27. Universities for Enlightenment. (2018, December 13). http://www.rkrs.si/gradiva/Dokumenti_RKRS/Priloga_k_sklepu_S22_joint_statement_ORIGINAL.PDF (accessed on 16th August 2019).
  28. 28. Vallaeys, F. (2018). Defining social responsibility: A matter of philosophical urgency for universities. The Global University Network for Innovation. http://www.guninetwork.org/articles/defining-social-responsibility-matter-philosophical-urgency-universities (accessed on 14th August 2019).
  29. 29. Vasilescu, R., Barna, C., Epure, M., & Baicu, C. (2010). Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4177–4182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660
  30. 30. European Commission. (2017, March 1). White paper on the future of Europe: Reflections and scenarios for the EU27 by 2025, p. 10. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf (accessed on 16th August 2019).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8414 | Journal ISSN: 2353-8503
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 24
Published on: Mar 30, 2021
Published by: ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Angelika M. Pabian, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.