Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Maps through the lens of scientific representation theories Cover

Maps through the lens of scientific representation theories

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Andrews, JH 1996, ‘What was a map? The lexicographers reply’, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1–11.
  2. Baranowski, M, Gotlib, D & Olszewski, R 2016, ‘Properties of cartographic modelling under contemporary definitions of a map’, Polish Cartographical Review, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 91–100.
  3. Callender, C & Cohen, J 2006, ‘There is no special problem about scientific representation’, Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 67–85.
  4. Contessa, G 2007, ‘Scientific representation, interpretation, and surrogative reasoning’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 48–68.
  5. Czerny, A 1987, ‘Mapa – model izomorficzny czy homomorficzny?’ [‘Map – isomorphic or homomorphic model? ’], Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 145–157.
  6. Czerny, A 1994, ‘Rozwój koncepcji modelowania kartograficznego’ [‘Development of the concept of cartographic modelling’], Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 185–202.
  7. da Costa, NCA & French, S 2003, Science and partial truth: A unitary approach to models and scientific reasoning, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  8. Frigg, R 2006, ‘Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories’, Theoria, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 49–65.
  9. Frigg, R & Hartmann, S 2020, ‘Models in science’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. EN Zalta, Fall 2020 Edition. Available from: <https://plato.stanford.edu//entries/models-science/> [25 May 2025].
  10. Frigg, R & Nguyen, J 2016, ‘The fiction view of models reloaded’, The Monist, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 225–242.
  11. Frigg, R & Nguyen, J 2021, ‘Scientific representation’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. EN Zalta, Winter 2021 Edition, Available from: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scientific-representation/> [25 May 2025].
  12. Giere, RN 2004, ‘How models are used to represent reality’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 742–752.
  13. Gotlib, D, Olszewski, R & Gartner, G 2021, ‘The extended concept of the map in view of modern geoinformation products’, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 10, no. 3, article number: 142.
  14. Grice, HP 1957, ‘Meaning’, Philosophical Review, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 377–388.
  15. Harley, JB 1989, ‘Deconstructing the map’, Cartographica, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1–20.
  16. Hughes, RIG 1997, ‘Models and representation’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, suppl., pp. S325–S336.
  17. Kraak, MJ & Fabrikant, SI 2017, ‘Of maps, cartography and the geography of the International Cartographic Association’, International Journal of Cartography, vol. 3, suppl. 1, pp. 9–31.
  18. Krukowski, M 2021, ‘Status of the cartographic model’, Polish Cartographical Review, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 63–76.
  19. Lapaine, M, Midtbø, T, Gartner, G, Bandrova, T, Wang, T & Shen, J 2021, ‘Definition of the map’, Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the International Cartographic Association, vol. 3, pp. 1–6.
  20. Makowski, A 2001, ‘Trójdzielna jedność mapy na tle idei systemu informacji przestrzennej’ [‘The tripartite unity of the map against the background of the idea of a spatial information system’], Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 38–42.
  21. Nersessian, NJ 1999, ‘Model-based reasoning in conceptual change’ in Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery, eds L Magnani, NJ Nersessian & P Thagard, Springer, Boston, MA.
  22. Ostrowski, W 2013, ‘Relacje semiotyczne w odniesieniu do kartografii’ [‘Semiotic relations with reference to cartography’], Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–14.
  23. Polous, N 2023, ‘Smart cartography: Representing complex geographical reality of 21st century’, International Journal of Cartography, vol. 9, pp. 619–637.
  24. Suárez, M 2003, ‘Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism’, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 225–244.
  25. Suárez, M 2004, ‘An inferential conception of scientific representation’, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 767–779.
  26. Suppe, F 1989, The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  27. Swoyer, C 1991, ‘Structural representation and surrogative reasoning’, Synthese, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 449–508.
  28. van Fraassen, BC 1980, The scientific image, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  29. van Fraassen, BC 2008, Scientific representation: Paradoxes of perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  30. Winther, RG 2024, ‘Models and maps’ in The Routledge handbook of philosophy of scientific modeling, eds T Knuuttila, N Carrillo & R Koskinen, Routledge, Abingdon. pp. 341–353.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2026-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2084-6118 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6046 (formerly 2084-6118)
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 22, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 30, 2026
Published on: Oct 11, 2026
Published by: Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Mirosław Krukowski, published by Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.