Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Attitudes of Generation Z students towards partnerships in light of the second demographic transition theory: An example of students from Kielce Cover

Attitudes of Generation Z students towards partnerships in light of the second demographic transition theory: An example of students from Kielce

Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Andersson, L 2016, ‘Gender, family life course and attitudes towards divorce in Sweden’, Acta Sociologica, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 51–67.
  2. Arnett, JJ 2000, ‘Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties’, American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 469–480.
  3. Badolato, L 2023, ‘Stratified pathways to Italy's ‘latest-late’ transition to adulthood’, Advances in Life Course Research, vol. 57, no. 3–4.
  4. Bakiera, L 2008, ‘Postawy młodych dorosłych wobec małżeństwa’ [‘Young adults' attitudes towards marriage’], Psychologia rozwojowa, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 67–68.
  5. Barhate B & Dirani, KM 2022, ‘Career aspirations of Generation Z: A systematic literature review’, European Journal of Training and Development, vol. 46 no. 1–2, pp. 139–157.
  6. Bauman, Z 2003, Razem czy osobno [Together or separately], Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków.
  7. van den Berg, L 2023, ‘The educational gradient in young singlehood: The role of gender and the gender climate’, Demographic Research, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 153–188.
  8. Billari, FC 2022, ‘Demography: Fast and slow’, Population and Development Review, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–30.
  9. Christensen, EJ 2014, Young adults' marital attitudes and intentions: The role of parental conflict, divorce and gender (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). Faculty of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, US. Available from: <https://api.mountainscholar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/8591fb92-93fc-4e98-8132-ed0faf83fe5d/content>. [5 February 2025]
  10. Day, MV, Kay, AC, Holmes, JG & Napier, JL 2011, ‘System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 291–306.
  11. De Coninck, D, van Doren, S & Matthijs, K, 2021, ‘Attitudes of young adults toward marriage and divorce, 2002–2018’, Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 66–82.
  12. De Coninck, D, Matthijs K & Dekeyser, G 2020, ‘What's in a family? Family conceptualizations of Flemish college-aged students (1997–2018)’, Family Relations, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 717–725
  13. Ferraretto, V & Vitali, A 2024, ‘The transition to adulthood in Europe at the intersection of gender and parental socioeconomic status’, Demographic Research, vol. 51, pp. 723–762.
  14. Fiskin, G & Sarı, E 2021, ‘Evaluation of the relationship between youth attitudes towards marriage and motivation for childbearing’, Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 121. Article number: 105856.
  15. Gizicka, D, Michalski, MA & Szwarc, K 2023, ‘Młode Polki, młodzi Polacy i ich plany rodzinne… Co młode pokolenie myśli o małżeństwie, rodzinie i rodzicielstwie?’ [Young Polish women, young Poles and their family plans… What does the young generation think about marriage, family and parenthood?], Instytut Wiedzy o Rodzinie i Społeczeństwie, Poznań.
  16. Hair, JF, Anderson, RE, Tatham, RL & Black, WC 1998, Multivariate data analysis, Englewood Cliffs, New York.
  17. Hardie, JH 2022, Best laid plans: Women coming of age in uncertain Times, University of California Press, Oakland.
  18. Helweg-Larsen, M, Harding, HG & Klein, WMP 2011, ‘Will I divorce or have a happy marriage?: Gender differences in comparative optimism and estimation of personal chances among U.S. college students’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 157–166.
  19. Herawati, I, Hoesni, SM, Manap, J & Mohd Khatib, NA 2023, ‘A qualitative study: Exploring marital readiness among Generation Z’, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2562–2568.
  20. Janiszewska, A 2022, ‘Drugie przejście demograficzne w dużych miastach w Polsce i jego implikacje’ [‘The second demographic transition in large cities in Poland and its implications’], Space – Society – Economy, vol. 33, pp. 7–40.
  21. Janiszewska, A 2013, ‘Małżeństwa vs związki nieformalne w opiniach młodych mieszkańców Łodzi’ [‘Marriages vs. informal relationships in the opinions of young residents of Lodz’], Space – Society – Economy, vol. 12, pp. 185–211.
  22. Johansson, T & Herz, M 2019, Youth studies in transition: Culture, generation and new learning processes, Springer, Cham, Switzerland.
  23. Kamińska, W 2010 ‘Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie kapitału ludzkiego i społecznego na obszarach wiejskich województw świętokrzyskiego’ in Kapitał ludzki i społeczny w procesie rozwoju obszarów wiejskich [Human and social capital in the process of rural development], eds. W Kamińska, K. Heffner, Studia KPZK PAN, vol. CXXVI, pp. 120–143.
  24. Kamińska, W 2011 ‘Kapitał ludzki i społeczny na obszarach wiejskich w Polsce. Przykład województwa świętokrzyskiego’ [Human and social capital in rural areas in Poland. Case of Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship], Wyd. UHP Jana Kochanowskiego [Jan Kochanowski University of Humanities and Sciences Publishing House], Kielce.
  25. Karabacak, A & Ciftci M 2016, ‘Examination of the relationship between marital attitudes and irrational romantic relationship beliefs of University students’, Study Psychology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 25–43.
  26. Kotowska, IE 2009, ‘Zmiany modelu rodziny a zmiany aktywności zawodowej kobiet w Europie’ [‘Changes in the family model and changes in women's professional activity in Europe’] in Strukturalne i kulturowe uwarunkowania aktywności zawodowej kobiet w Polsce [Structural and cultural conditions of women's professional activity in Poland], ed. IE Kotowska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe SCHOLAR, pp. 15–56.
  27. Kurek, S & Lange, M 2013, Zmiany zachowań prokreacyjnych w Polsce w ujęciu przestrzennym [Changes in reproductive behavior in Poland in spatial terms], Prace Monograficzne, no. 658, Kraków.
  28. Lesthaeghe, R 2010, ‘The unfolding story of the second demographic transition’, Population and Development Review, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 211–251.
  29. Lesthaeghe, RJ & van de Kaa, DJ 1986, ‘Twee demografische transities?’ [‘Two demographic transitions?’] in Bevolking: Groei en krimp [Population: Growth and shrinkage], eds RJ Lesthaeghe & DJ van de Kaa, van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer, Netherlands, pp. 9–24.
  30. Mariański J 2023, ‘Wartości codzienne młodzieży szkolnej ze wsi, z małych i wielkich miast’ [‘Everyday values of school youth from villages, small and large cities’] in Małe miasta. Blaski i cienie [Small Towns: Lights and Shadows], ed. M Zemło, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, pp. 141–178.
  31. Mariański, J 2011, Przemiany moralności polskich maturzystów. Studium socjologiczne [Moral transformations of Polish high school graduates. A sociological study], Wydawnictwo Naukowe KUL, Lublin.
  32. Mostafapour, V, Eskandari, H, Borjali, A, Sohrabi, F & Asgari, M 2025, ‘A narrative exploration of transformation of moral, social and cultural values among Generation Z in the context of marriage’, International Journal of Ethics and Society, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 40–55.
  33. Mynarska, M & Bernardi, L 2007, ‘Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland’, Demographic Research, vol. 16, no. 17, pp. 519–554.
  34. Patel, H & Morrison E 2019, ‘Generation Z: Step aside Millennials’, Barclays Research Highlights: Sustainable & Thematic Investing. Available from: <https://www.ib.barclays/content/dam/barclaysmicrosites/ibpublic/documents/our-insights/genz/Leaflet%20Generation_Z.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0e8BmrWF7hSOMYa24y3t2RLOOOXC5avEwBO8D3i89UtRP91CYsM8xTxIo>. [2 March 2025].
  35. Petty, RE & Cacioppo, JT 1981, Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches, IA: William C. Brown, Dubuque.
  36. Ruszkiewicz, D 2024, ‘Preferowana forma życia osobistego młodych dorosłych’ [‘Young adults' preferred form of personal life’], Zeszyty Naukowe KUL, vol. 67, no 2, pp. 83–102.
  37. Sassler, S & Lichter, DT 2020, ‘Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns’, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 35–61.
  38. Slany, K 2002, Alternatywne formy życia małżeńsko-rodzinnego w ponowoczesnym świecie [Alternative forms of marital and family life in the postmodern world], Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS, Kraków.
  39. Sobotka, T & Toulemon, L 2008, Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 85–138.
  40. Sonkaya, ZI & Öcal NÜ 2024, ‘Young people's attitudes toward marriage, gender roles, and related factors. Attitudes toward marriage, gender roles’, BMC Public Health, vol. 24.
  41. ‘Stosunek do związków partnerskich’ [‘Attitude towards civil partnerships’] 2024, Komunikat z badań [Research report], no. 77, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, Warszawa.
  42. ‘Stosunek Polaków do rozwodów’ [‘Poles' attitudes towards divorce’] 2019, Komunikat z badań [Research report], no. 7, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, Warszawa.
  43. Szafraniec, K 2011, Młodzi 2011 [Young 2011], Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów [Chancellery of the Prime Minister], Warszawa.
  44. Szczygielski, DM 2017, ‘Postawy młodzieży wobec alternatywnych form życia małżeńsko rodzinnego. Na podstawie badań socjologicznych w katolickich liceach ogólnokształcących w Szczecinie’ [‘Attitudes of young people towards alternative forms of marital and family life. Based on sociological research in Catholic secondary schools in Szczecin’], Zeszyty Naukowe KUL, vol. 60, no 2, pp. 321–338.
  45. Sztabiński, F 2003, ‘Logika badacza i logika respondenta – problem adekwatności narzędzia badawczego’ [‘Researcher logic and respondent logic – the problem of adequacy of the research tool’], Ask Research and Metods, vol. 12, pp. 147–175.
  46. Świątkiewicz, W 2016, ‘Młodzież wobec małżeństwa i rodziny. Konteksty kulturowe i religijne’ [‘Youth and marriage and family. cultural and religious contexts], Zeszyty Naukowe KUL, vol. 59, no 4, pp. 133–148.
  47. Tarka, P 2015, ‘Własności 5-cio i 7-mio stopniowej skali Likerta w kontekście normalizacji zmiennych metodą Kaufmanna i Rousseeuwa’ [Properties of the 5- and 7-point Likert scale in the context of the normalization of variables using the Kaufmann and Rousseeuw method], Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu [Scientific works of the University of Economics in Wrocław], vol. 385, pp. 286–295.
  48. Thornton, A, Axinn, WG & Xie Y 2008, Marriage and Cohabitation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  49. Waters, J & Chaney, M 2023, What to expect as Gen Z starts to parent. Available from: <https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5936b0c92994cab8bfe601d4/t/6453be2e5a8042063e4129ad/1683209783808/Updated+Gen+Z+Parenting+PPT+2023.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0NCpeuuXZX_UjfbZCJnjbY5l8lptzrqNCGNd1A26jhbQgg7TNiRnrIUOM>. [11 March 2025].
  50. We, The family. How Gen Z Is Rewriting the Rules of Parenting 2021, ViceMediaGroup. Available from: <https://www.vicemediagroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Gen-Z-Parents-Global-Report_FINAL.pdf>. [26 February 2025].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2025-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2084-6118 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6046
Language: English
Page range: 247 - 256
Submitted on: Apr 24, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2025
Published on: Sep 4, 2025
Published by: Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Wioletta Kamińska, Mirosław Mularczyk, published by Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.