Regional and local border effects after two decades of Central European unification. What matters?

Neumannová, Michaela; Pařil, Vilém; Hrůza, Filip; Jakubčinová, Martina; Farbiak, Martin

doi:10.2478/mgrsd-2023-0007

Abstract

This article deals with the border effect phenomenon affecting the mobility of inhabitants in border regions. It aims to identify the determinants of the border effect in transport at the municipal level, considering the distance from the border, the populations and the characteristics of the closest bordering country. The survey in the Czech Republic eventually involved 675 representatives of municipalities who answered questions on inter-municipal mobility. The results confirmed that the most substantial handicap was population size, with small populations corresponding to the limited use of public transport when travelling beyond a given border. The results confirmed that the characteristics of the state or region that shares the border must be considered when assessing border regions. Therefore, the solution to the problems of individual border regions cannot be viewed with a single instrument. It is necessary to consider substantial differences resulting from the economic level of neighbouring countries.

References

Balaguer, J & Ripollés, J 2018, ‘Revisiting the importance of border effect in sub-national regions. Evidence from a quasi-experimental design’, Papers in Regional Science, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1113–1131.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buch, T, Schmidt, TD & Niebuhr, A 2009, ‘Cross-border commuting in the Danish-German border region - integration, institutions and cross-border interaction’, Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 38–54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Camagni, R, Capello, R, Caragliu, A & Toppeta, A 2017, ‘Quantification of the effects of Legal and administrative border obstacles in land border regions’, Final report, European Commission: Brussels. Available from: <https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/evidence-and-data/quantification-effects-legal-and-administrative-border-obstacles-land-border.html>. [8 March 2022].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cavallaro, F & Dianin, A 2019, ‘Cross-border commuting in Central Europe: features, trends and policies’, Transport Policy, vol. 78, pp. 86–104.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Drápela, E & Bašta, J 2018, ‘Quantification of the strength of the border effect at the borders of the Liberec region’, Geographical Information, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 51–60.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ESPON 2018, Cross-border Public Services (CPS). Targeted Analysis. Available from: <https://www.espon.eu/cps>. [4 June 2023].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hataley, T & Leuprecht, C 2018, ‘Determinants of cross-border cooperation’, Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 317–328.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Havranek, T & Irsova, Z 2016, ‘Do borders really slash trade? A meta-analysis’, IMF Economic Review, vol. 65, pp. 365–396.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hazledine, T 2009, ‘Border effects for domestic and international Canadian passenger air travel’, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 15, pp. 7–13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Institute for Spatial Development 2023, ESPON 2030. Available from: <https://www.uur.cz/mezinarodni-spoluprace/espon/>. [4 June 2023].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klodt, H 2004, ‘Border effects in passenger air traffic’, Kyklos, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 519–532.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCallum, J 1995, ‘National borders matter: Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns’, The American Economic Review, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 615–623.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Milenković, M 2012, ‘Ecoregionalism - Factor cross-border cooperation and tourism development’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 44, pp. 236–240.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Medeiros, E 2019, ‘Cross-border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions’, Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 7, pp. 1–12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Medeiros, E et al. 2021, ‘Boosting cross-border regions through better cross-border transport services. The European case’, Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 9, pp. 291–301.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Medeiros, E, Guillermo-Ramirez, M, Dellagiacoma, C, Brustia, G & Mullan, C 2022, ‘Reducing border barriers for cross-border commuters in Europe via the EU b-solutions initiative’, European Planning Studies, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 822–841.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reitel, B, Wassenberg, B & Peyrony, J 2018, ‘The INTERREG Experience in bridging European territories. A 30-year summary’ in: European Territorial Cooperation. The Urban Book Series, ed. E Medeiros, Springer, Cham: pp. 7–24.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rietveld, P 2012, ‘Barrier effects of borders: implications for border-crossing infrastructures’, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 150–166.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Studzieniecki, T 2016, ‘The development of cross-border cooperation in an EU macroregion – a case study of the Baltic Sea Region’, Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 39, pp. 235–241.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Turrini, A & van Ypersele, T 2010, ‘Traders, courts, and the border effect puzzle’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 40, pp. 81–91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zijlstra, T 2020, ‘A border effect in airport choice: Evidence from Western Europe’, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 88, pp. 1–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Regional and local border effects after two decades of Central European unification. What matters?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account