Have a personal or library account? Click to login
LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland Cover

LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland

Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. Adamski, T 2008, ‘Pomiędzy zaufaniem a kontrolą – rola wiedzy lokalnej w pilotażowym programie LEADER w Polsce’ [Between trust and control – the role of local knowledge in the pilot LEADER programme in Poland] in Społeczne aspekty zrównoważonego rozwoju wsi w Polsce. Partycypacja lokalna i kapitał społeczny [Social aspects of sustainable rural development in Polnand. Local participation and social capital] eds. H Podedworna & P Ruszkowski, Wyd. Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa, pp. 87-101.
  2. Antoci, A, Sabatini, F & Sodini, M 2009, Fragility of Social Capital, FEEM Working Paper No. 16.2009, University of Sien, Siena, Italy. 30 pp.
  3. Barke, M & Newton, M 1997, ‘The EU LEADER Initiative and Endogenous Rural Development: the Application of the Programme in Two Rural Areas of Andalusia, Southern Spain’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-341.
  4. Bernhard, M 1996, ‘Civil society after the first transition: dilemmas of Postcommunist Democratization in Poland and beyond’, Communist Post-Communist Stud., vol. 29, pp. 309-330.
  5. Berriet-Solliec, M, Laidin, C, Lepicier, D, Vu Pham, H, Pollermann, K, Raue, P & Schnaut, G 2018, ‘Governance of policy at a local level LEADER programs analysis’ Towards Rural Synergies and Trade-offs between Economic development and Ecosystem services (TRUSTEE), Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, Dijon, p. 96.
  6. Bicker, A, Sillotoe, P & Pottier, J 2004, ‘Preface’ in Investigating Local Knowledge. New Directions, New Approaches ed. A Bicker, Ashagate, Aldershot, p. 237.
  7. Biczkowski, M 2013, ‘Fundusze unijne jako czynnik rozwoju regionalnego w odniesieniu do koncepcji rozwoju neoendogenicznego [European funds as an factor regional development with regard to the concept of development neoendogenous]’, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich [Rural Studies] vol. 34, pp. 71-85.
  8. Biczkowski, M 2016, ‘Fundusze unijne wdrażane poprzez Regionalne Programy Operacyjne jako neoendogeniczny czynnik rozwoju obszarów wiejskich [EU funds implemented by the Regional Operational Programmes as neo-endogenous development factor for rural areas]’, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich [Rural Studies] vol. 41, pp. 63-81.
  9. Biczkowski, M & Rudnicki, R 2017, ‘Odnowa wsi jako czynnik aktywizacji społeczności lokalnych [Village Renewal as a Factor Activating Local Communities]’, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich [Rural Studies] vol. 48, pp. 75-101.
  10. Bosworth, G & Atterton, J 2012, ‘Entrepreneurial In-migration and Neoendogenous Rural Development’, Rural Sociology vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 254–279.
  11. Bosworth, G, Price, L, Anniba, I, Sellick, J, Carroll, T & Shepherd, J 2013, ‘LEADER as a vehicle for neoendogenous rural development in England’, in European Society for Rural Sociology, Rural resilience and vulnerability: the rural as locus of solidarity and conflict in times of crisis, XXVth Congress of the European Society for Rural Sociology, Florence, Italy, pp. 229-230.
  12. Bosworth, G, Annibal, I, Carroll, T, Price, L, Sellick, J & Shepherd, J 2015, ‘Empowering Local Action through Neo-Endogenous Development; The case of LEADER in England’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 427-449.
  13. Bowden, EV & Bowden, JH 2002, Ekonomia nauka zdrowego rozsądku [Economics - the science of common sense] Warszawa, Wyd. Fundacja Innowacja, 912 pp.
  14. Böcher, M 2008, ‘Regional governance and rural development in Germany: the implementation of LEADER+’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 372-388.
  15. Brodziński, Z & Brodzińska, A 2014, ‘Sektor społeczny i jego rola w stymulowaniu rozwoju obszarów wiejskich’ [Public sector and its role in stimulating the development of rural areas], Roczniki Naukowe, Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu [Annals of The Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists], vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 52–56.
  16. Bukraba-Rylska, I 2011, ‘Kapitał społeczny polskiej wsi w świetle badań na programem LEADER’ [Social capital of Polish countryside in the light of research on the Leader program], in Między interwencją a interakcją. Lokalne grupy działania w społecznościach wiejskich [Between intervention and interaction. Local Action Groups in rural communities] ed. I Bukraba-Rylska, Wyd. Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa, 12–33.
  17. Buller, H 2000, ‘Re-creating rural territories: Leader in France’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 190-199.
  18. Campbell, A & Coulson, A 2006, ‘Into the mainstream: local democracy in Central and Eastern Europe’, Local Government Studies vol. 32, pp. 543-561.
  19. Chigbu, UE 2012, ‘Village renewal as an instrument of rural development: Evidence from Weyarn, Germany’, Community Development vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 209-224.
  20. Churski, P 2008, Czynniki rozwoju regionalnego i polityka regionalna w Polsce w okresie integracji z Unią Europejską [Factors of regional development and regional policy in Poland in the period of integration with the European Union] UAM Poznań, Seria Geografia, 79, 341 pp.
  21. Convery, I, Soane, I, Dutson, T et al. 2010, ‘Mainstreaming LEADER delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: an interpretive phenomenological analysis’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 370-391.
  22. Czudec, A, Miś, T & Zając, D 2018, Zrównoważony rozwój obszarów wiejskich w wymiarze regionalnym [Sustainable development of rural areas in the regional dimension] Poznań, Bogucki Wyd. Naukowe, 145 pp.
  23. Dargan, L & Shucksmith, M 2008, ‘LEADER and innovation’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 274-291.
  24. Dax, T, Strahl, W, Kirwan, J & Maye, D 2013, ‘The LEADER programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland’, European Urban and Regional Studies vol. 23 issue 1, pp. 56-68.
  25. Esparcia Perez, J 2000, ‘The LEADER programme and the rise of rural development in Spain’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 200-207.
  26. Fałkowski, J 2013, ‘Political accountability and governance in rural areas: Some evidence from the Pilot Programme LEADER in Poland’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 32, pp. 70-79.
  27. Farell, G & Thiron, S 2005, ‘Social capital and rural development: from winelose to winewin with the LEADER initiative’, in Winning and Losing: The Changing Geography of Europes Rural Areas, ed. D Schmied, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp. 281-298.
  28. Fekete, E 2014, Cross-community cooperation in post-socialist Hungarian rural space in In search of therelational rurals Cooperation in rural, peripheral areas of Europe, its challenges and solutions ed. E Kasabov, Palgrave Macmillan (forthcoming), pp. 68-97.
  29. Filipek, A 2016 W drodze do dofinansowania. Jak napisać dobry wniosek [On the way to funding. How to write a good application] Warszawa, Wyd. PLACET, 280 pp.
  30. Furmankiewicz, M & Królikowska, K 2010, ‘Partnerstwa terytorialne na obszarach wiejskich w Polsce w latach 19942006[Territorial partnerships in rural areas in Poland in years 1994–2006, Wrocław, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego, 220 pp.
  31. Furmankiewicz, M & Janc, K 2011, ‘Wpływ Programu Pilotażowego Leader+ (2004-2008) na aktywność mieszkańców gmin należących do partnerstw terytorialnych w województwie dolnośląskim’ [The Leader+ Pilot Programme’s impact on the activity of inhabitants of communes participating in territorial partnerships in Lower Silesia], Wieś i Rolnictwo [Village and Agriculture], vol. 1(150), pp. 106-123.
  32. Furmankiewicz, M 2012, ‘LEADER+ territorial governance in Poland: successes and failures as a rational choice effect’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 103 (3), pp. 261-275.
  33. Furmankiewicz, M 2013, ‘Współrządzenie czy ukryta dominacja sektora publicznego? Koncepcja governance w praktyce lokalnych grup działania LEADER’ [Co-governance or hidden domination of the public sector? The concept of governance in the practice of ‘Leader’ Local Action Groups], Studia Regionalne i Lokalne [Regional and Local Studies] vol. 1, no. 51, pp. 71-89.
  34. Furmankiewicz, M, Janc, K & Macken-Walsh, A 2016, ‘The impact of EU governance and rural development policy on the development of the third sector in rural Poland: A nation-wide analysis’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 43, pp. 225-234.
  35. Gendźwiłł, A, Krukowska, J & Lackowska, M 2019, ‘Disappointment or unexpected gain? A survey-based study of the motives and outcomes of inter-municipal cooperation in Poland’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 235-241.
  36. Gkartzios, M & Scott, M 2014, ‘Placing housing in rural development: exogenous, endogenous and neo-endogenous approaches’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 241-265.
  37. Gorzelak, G 2004, ‘Polska polityka regionalna – cele, uwarunkowania, instytucje, instrumenty’ [Polish regional policy - goals, conditions, institutions, instruments] in Polska wobec nowej polityki spójności Unii Europejskiej [Poland towards the new cohesion policy of the European Union] eds. TG Grosse, Warszawa, Wyd. Instytut Spraw Publicznych.
  38. Gorlach, K, Adamski, T & Klekotko, M 2008, ‘Współrządzenie i rozwój zrównoważony społeczności lokalnych: przypadki w społeczności wiejskiej’ [Governance and Sustainable Development in Local Communities: Cases from the Rural Area], Przegląd socjologiczny [Sociological Reviev], vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 135-157.
  39. Goszczyński, W 2008, ‘Kształtowanie synergicznych form kapitału społecznego jako warunek prawidłowej aktywizacji społeczności lokalnych na przykładzie pilotażowego programu LEADER+’ [Shaping synergistic forms of social capital as a condition for proper activation of local communities on the example of the pilot program LEADER +] in Społeczne aspekty zrównoważonego rozwoju wsi w Polsce [Social aspects of rural development diversification in Poland] eds. H Podedworna & P Ruszkowski, Wyd. Naukowe Scholar, Warszawa, pp. 102-122.
  40. Gualini, E 2004, Multi-Level Governance and Institutional Change. The Europeanisation of Regional policy in Italy Ashgate, Alderhot, 314 pp.
  41. Guzal-Dec, D, Zwolińska-Ligaj, M & Zbucki, Ł 2019,’ The potential of smart development of urban-rural communes in peripheral region (a case study of the Lublin Region, Poland)’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 85-91.
  42. Hadyński, J & Borucka, K 2015, ‘The effects of rural development policy in the European Union within the context of LEADER programme’s implementation in the Wielkopolska voivodeship’, Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development vol. 1, no. 35, pp. 49-56.
  43. High, C & Nemes, G 2007, ‘Social learning in LEADER: exogenous, endogenous and hybrid evaluation in rural development’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 103-119.
  44. Huttner, N 2013, ‘Entwicklung ländlicher Kommunen. Wenn Bürger Beteiligung ernst nehmen’ [Rural renewal: citizens take their chance of participation], Organisationsberat Superv Coach vol. 20, pp. 23-34.
  45. Jessop, B 2000, ‘The Dynamics of Partnership and Governance Failure’, in The New Politics of Local Governance in Britain ed. G Stoker, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 11-32.
  46. Jessop, B 2008, ‘Institutional theory and political economy’, in Debating Institutionalism, eds. J Pierre, B Peters & G Stoker, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 210-231.
  47. Juska, A, Poviliunas, A, Žiliukaite, R et al. 2008, ‘Rural intelligentsia and path dependency in post-socialist civic organizing: the case of Lithuania’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 48. no. 2, pp. 93-117.
  48. Katona-Kovacs, J, High, C & Nemes, G 2011, ‘Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups’, European Countryside, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 227-240.
  49. Kearney, B, Boyle, G & Walsh, J 1994, EU LEADER I in Ireland: evaluation and recommendations Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, Dublin, 142 pp.
  50. Klasik, A ed. 2003, Zarządzanie rozwojem lokalnym i regionalnym w kontekście integracji europejskiej [Management of local and regional development in the context of European integration] Warszawa, KPZK PAN, 298 pp.
  51. Klekotko, M 2005, ‘Wiejskie społeczeństwo obywatelskie czy wiejskie społeczności obywatelskie? O problemach badania obywatelskości ludności wiejskiej’ [Rural civil society or rural civic communities? On the problems of studying the citizenship of rural population] in W obliczu zmiany: wybrane strategie działania mieszkańców polskiej wsi [In the face of change: selected strategies of action of the inhabitants of the Polish countryside] eds. K Gorlach & G Foryś, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków, pp. 107-117.
  52. Klekotko, M 2008, ‘Społeczeństwo obywatelskie a rozwój zrównoważony wsi. Podejście poznawcze’ [Civil society and sustainable rural development. Cognitive approach], in Społeczne aspekty zrównoważonego rozwoju wsi w Polsce. Partycypacja lokalna i kapitał społeczny [Social aspects of sustainable rural development in Poland. Local participation and social capital] eds. H Podedworna & P Ruszkowski, Warszawa, Wyd. Naukowe Scholar, pp. 21-36.
  53. Kłodziński, M 2003, ‘Kapitał społeczny jako podstawowy czynnik różnicujący stopień rozwoju gospodarczo-społecznego gmin wiejskich’ [Social capital as the basic factor that differentiates the degree of economic and social development of rural communes] in Strategie rozwoju lokalnego. Aspekty instytucjonalne [Local development strategies. Institutional aspects], ed M Adamowicz, vol. I, Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa, pp. 161-169.
  54. Knieć, W 2012, Wspólna Polityka Rolna a zrównoważony rozwój obszarów wiejskich Polski [Common Agricultural Policy and sustainable development of Polish rural areas] Toruń, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 348 pp.
  55. Korolczuk, E 2017, ‘Społeczeństwo obywatelskie w Polsce – kryzys czy nowe otwarcie?’ [Civil society in Poland - crisis or new opening?], Seria analizy Instytutu Studiów Zaawansowanych [Analysis series Institute of Advanced Studies] Warszawa, 10 pp.
  56. Kotala, A & Puchała, J 2009, ‘Potrzeby doradcze Lokalnych Grup Działania’ [The Need for Advisory Service of Local Activity Groups], Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie, Polityki Europejskie, Finanse i Marketing [Scientific Journals Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW. European Policies, Finance and Marketing], vol. 2, no. 51/II, Wydawnictwo SGGW, Warszawa, pp. 105-112.
  57. Kovach, I 2000, ‘LEADER, A new social order, and the Central-and East-European countries’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 181-189.
  58. Kuciński, K 1994, Geografia ekonomiczna – zarys teoretyczny [Economic geography - a theoretical outline], Warszawa, Wyd. Szkoła Główna Handlowa, 242 pp.
  59. Mayer, S 1997, ‘Citizen participation in village renewal – experiences from the preliminary phase’, Munchener Geographische Hefte vol. 75, pp. 103-126.
  60. McArdle, K 2012, ‘What makes a successful rural regeneration partnership? The views of successful partners and the importance of ethos for the community development professional’, Community Development vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 333-345.
  61. McLachlan, K & Arden, C 2009, ‘Community Learning Projects: Transforming Post-Compulsory Education Provision in Rural Communities’, Rural Society vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 146-162.
  62. Metis, 2010, ‘Ex-post evaluation of LEADER+’, Final Deliverable, Vienna, 358 pp.
  63. Michalewska-Pawlak, M 2013, Priorytety i wyzwania polityki rozwoju obszarów wiejskich Unii Europejskiej [Priorities and challenges of the rural development policy of the European Union] Warszawa. Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA, 224 pp.
  64. Miś, T 2013, ‘Budowanie kapitału społecznego przez instytucje szczebla regionalnego’ [Building social capital on rural areas in Poland by institutions on a regional level], Roczniki Naukowe SERiAAnnals of The Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists vol. XV, no. 1, pp. 153-158.
  65. Moseley, MJ 2003, Local Partnerships for Rural Development’. The European Experience, London, CABI Publishing, 256 pp.
  66. Nardone, G, Sisto, R & Lopolito, A 2010, ‘Social capital in the LEADER Initiative: a methodological approach’, Joural of Rural Studies vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 63-72.
  67. Nemes, G & Fazekas, Z 2007, ‘A paradigm shift e new ways of rural development in Europe’, Journal of Comparative Economic and Social Systems vol. 2, pp. 75-82.
  68. Oakley, P 1991, ‘Projects with people: the practice of participation in rural development’, International Labor Office Geneva, 284 pp.
  69. Ocena funkcjonowania lokalnych grup działania realizujących lokalną strategię rozwoju w ramach PROW 2007-2013 [Assessment of the functioning of local action groups implementing the local development strategy under RDP 2007-2013] 2012a, Raport PSDB, Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi, Warszawa, 169 pp.
  70. Ocena średniookresowa Programu Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich na lata 2007-2013 [Mid-term evaluation of the Rural Development Program for 2007-2013] 2012b, Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi, vol. I-IV, Warszawa.
  71. Oostindie, H & van Broekhuizen, R 2010, ‘RDP and Performance Contract Based Rural Policy Delivery in the Netherlands: Assessing the Impact of Rural Development Policies (incl. Wageningen: Wageningen, University and Research Centre, Rural Sociology 22 pp.
  72. Osborne, SP, Williamson, A & Beattie, R 2004, ‘Community involvement in rural regeneration partnerships:Exploring the rural dimension’, Local Government Studies vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 156-181.
  73. Osborne, SP, Beattie, R & Williamson, A 2006, ‘The impact of local voluntary and community sector infrastructure on community involvement in rural regeneration partnerships’, Public Money and Management vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 235-242.
  74. Parysek, JJ 2001, Podstawy gospodarki lokalnej [The basics of the local economy] Poznań, Wydawnictwa Naukowe UAM, 242 pp.
  75. Pemberton, S & Goodwin, M 2010, ‘Rethinking the changing structures of rural local government – State power, rural politics and local political strategies?’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 272-283.
  76. Podemski, K 2014, ‘Społeczeństwo obywatelskie w Polsce 25 lat po wielkiej zmianie’ [Civil Society in Poland 25 years after the Great Change], Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny [Legal, Economic and Sociological Movement] vol. LXXVI, no. 2, pp. 89-109.
  77. Pollermann, K, Raue, P & Schnaut, G 2008, ‘Evaluation of regional governance in rural development’, in European Evaluation SocietyBuilding for the Future Evaluation in Governance, Development and Progress: abstractbook, EES Conference. Lisboa Congress Centre. Lisbon, p. 11.
  78. Pollermann, K, Raue, P & Schnaut, G 2013, ‘Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER’, Studies in agricultural economics, vol. 115, pp. 111-117.
  79. Pollermann, K, Raue, P & Schnaut, G 2014, ‘Multi-level Governance in rural development: Analysing experiences from LEADER for a Community-Led Local Development (CLLD)’, Political Science 54th Congress of the ERSA “Regional development & globalisation: Best practices”; St. Petersburg, 21 pp. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/104063 (access: 26 june 2020).
  80. Psyk-Piotrowska, E 2013, ‘Badanie kapitału społecznego LGD – uzasadnienie problemu, założenia metodologiczne, podstawowe wyniki badań’ [The research of social capital of the Local Action Groups – the concept of research, analysis and conclusions], Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Sociologica vol. 44, pp. 89-108.
  81. Racine, JB & Raymond, H 1977, Analiza ilościowa w geografii [Quantitative analysis in geography] PWN, Warszawa, pp. 110-116.
  82. Ray, C 1996, ‘The dialectic of local development: the case of EU LEADER 1 rural development programme’, Working Paper Series no 23, Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, 37 pp.
  83. Ray, C 1997, ‘Towards a theory of the dialectic of local rural development within the European Union’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 37, pp. 345-362.
  84. Ray, C 2000, ‘The EU LEADER Programme: Rural Development Laboratory’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 163-172.
  85. Ray, C 2001, Culture Economies: a perspective on local rural development in Europe, Centre for Rural Economy University of Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Rural Economy, Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing, Newcastle, 151 pp.
  86. Ray, C 2006, ‘Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU’ in The handbook of rural studies eds. P Cloke, T Marsden & P Mooney, SAGE Publications Ltd., London, pp. 278-292.
  87. Reed, M 2008, ‘The rural arena: The diversity of protest in rural England’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 209-218.
  88. Shucksmith, M 2000, ‘Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: perspectives from LEADER in the UK’, Sociologia Ruralis vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 208-218.
  89. Shucksmith, M 2010, ‘Disintegrated rural development? Neo-endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
  90. Stanny, M 2013, ‘Zasoby lokalne jako czynniki rozwoju obszarów wiejskich w Polsce’ [Local resources as factors of rural development in Poland] in Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie rozwoju obszarów wiejskich w Polsce [Spatial differentiation of the development of rural areas in Poland], ed. M. Stanny, Warszawa, IRWiR PAN, pp. 213-262.
  91. Teilmann, KA & Thuesen, A 2014, ‘Important Types of LAG–Municipality Interaction When Collaborating on Rural Development Lessons from Danish LEADER LAGs, International Journal of Rural Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21-45.
  92. Terluin, IJ 2003, ‘Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: An overview and critical analysis of theories’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 327-344.
  93. The State-of-play of the Implementation of Rural Development Programme Measure 421 in the EU-27, Final Report ENRD, 2014, 148 pp. https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/publications/state-play-implementation-rdp-measure-421-eu-27_pl (access: 20 january 2020).
  94. Thlon, M ed. 2015, Budowa kapitału społecznego do wykorzystania w procesie zarządzania rozwojem kierowanym przez lokalną społeczność [Building social capital to be used in the community-led development management process] MRiRW, Publ. Fundacja Programów Pomocy dla Rolnictwa FAPA, Warszawa, p. 200.
  95. Thompson, N & Ward, N 2005, ‘Rural Areas and Regional Competitiveness’, Centre for Rural Economy Research Report Report to Local Government Rural Network, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle, 34 pp.
  96. van der Ploeg, JD & van Dijk, G 1995, Beyond modernisation: the impact of endogenous rural development Assen: van Gorcum, 297 pp.
  97. Veveris, A & Puzulis, A 2019, ‘The contribution of the leader approach to the development of rural areas in Latvia’ in Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference “Economic science for rural development” Jelgava, LLU ESAF, vol. 50, pp. 217-224.
  98. Ward, N, Atterton, J, Kim, TY, Lowe, P, Phillipson, J & Thompson, N 2005, ‘Universities, the Knowledge Economy and ‘Neo-Endogenous Rural Development’’, Centre for Rural Economy Discussion Paper Series vol. 1, pp. 1-15.
  99. White, S 2011, ‘Depoliticizing development: the uses and abuses of participation’ in The Participation Reader ed. A Cornwall, Zed Books, London, pp. 57-69.
  100. Wielofunduszowość i planowanie lokalnych strategii rozwoju – relacja z konferencji poświęconej przyszłości Leadera w kolejnym okresie programowania [Multi-funding and planning local development strategies - report from the conference on the future of Leader in the next programming period] 20.12.2012, http://ksow.gov.pl/news/entry/3817-wielofunduszowosc-i-planowanie-lokalnych-strat.html[access: 26.06.2020].
  101. Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska, A 2011, ‘Social Capital as an Endogenous Factor of Local Development’, Roczniki Naukowe SERiA vol. XIII, no. 6, pp. 255-259.
  102. Woods, M 2003, ‘Deconstructing rural protest: the emergence of a new social movement’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 19, no.3, pp. 309-325.
  103. Woods, M 2008, ‘Social movements and rural politics’, Journal of Rural Studies vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 129-137.
  104. Zajda, K 2011, Nowe formy kapitału społecznego wsi. Studium przypadku lokalnych grup działania z województwa łódzkiego [New forms of rural social capital. Case study of local action groups from the Lodzkie Voivodship] Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, p. 196.
  105. Zajda, K & Kretek-Kamińska, A 2014, Wykorzystanie zasobów Lokalnych Grup Działania [Use of the resources of Local Action Groups], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, p. 148.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2084-6118 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6046
Language: English
Page range: 232 - 244
Submitted on: Jan 28, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 22, 2020
Published on: Oct 31, 2020
Published by: Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Mirosław Biczkowski, published by Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.