
Figure 1
JECAM cropland site 25 km × 25 km, highlighted in yellow, with field sites where chlorophyll fluorescence were measured
Source: own elaboration

Figure 2
Scheme of work
Source: own elaboration

Figure 3
Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements on sugar beets with OS5p+ Pulse Modulated Chlorophyll Fluorometer
Source: photo by Maciej Bartold
Table 1
Vegetation indices calculated from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Index | Description | Equation | Reference |
| Assessment of the general condition of vegetation | CTVI | Corrected Transformed Vegetation Index | Perry, 1984 | |
| DVI | Difference Vegetation Index | DVI= aRNIR-Rred | Richardson, 1977 | |
| EVI | Enhanced Vegetation Index | Huete, 1999 | ||
| GEMI | Global Environmental Monitoring Index | Pinty, 1992 | ||
| GNDVI | Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index | Gitelson, 1998 | ||
| IRECI | Inverted Red Edge Chlorophyll Index | Frampton et al., 2013 | ||
| MSAVI | Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index | Qi et al., 1994 | ||
| MSAVI2 | Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index 2 | Qi et al., 1994 | ||
| NDREI1 | Normalized Difference Red Edge Index 1 | Gitelson And Merzlyak, 1994 | ||
| NDREI2 | Normalized Difference Red Edge Index 2 | Barnes, 2000 | ||
| NDVI | Normalized Difference Vegetation Index | Rouse, 1974 | ||
| NRVI | Normalized Ratio Vegetation Index | Baret, 1991 | ||
| REIP | Red Edge Inflection Point | Guyot And Barnet, 1988 | ||
| RVI | Ratio Vegetation Index | Bannari et al., 1995 | ||
| SATVI | Soil Adjusted Total Vegetation Index | Marsett, 2006 | ||
| SAVI | Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index | Huete, 1988 | ||
| SLAVI | Specific Leaf Area Vegetation Index | Lymburger et al., 2000 | ||
| SR | Simple Ratio Vegetation Index | Birth, 1968 | ||
| TTVI | Thiam's Transformed Vegetation Index | Thiam, 1997 | ||
| TVI | Transformed Vegetation Index | Deering, 1975 | ||
| WDVI | Weighted Difference Vegetation Index | WDVI=RNIR-a*Rred | Richardson, 1977 | |
| Assessment of photosynthetically active pigment | CLG | Chlorophyll Index Green | Gitelson, 2003 | |
| CLRE | Red-edge-band Chlorophyll Index | Gitelson, 2003 | ||
| MCARI | Modified Chlorophyll Absorption Ratio Index | Daughtery, 2000 | ||
| MTCI | MERIS Terrestrial Chlorophyll Index | Dash And Curran, 2004 | ||
| S2REP | Sentinel-2 Red-Edge Position Index | Frampton et al., 2013 | ||
| Assessment of the amount of light used in photosynthesis | SIPI | Structure Insensitive Pigment Index | Peñuelas et al., 1995 | |
| ZMI | Zarco-Tejada & Miller Index | Zarco-Tejada et al., 2001 | ||
| Assessment of water content | DSWI | Disease Water Stress Index | Galvão et al., 2005 | |
| MNDWI | Modified Normalized Difference Water Index | Xu, 2006 | ||
| NDWI | Normalized Difference Water Index | McFeeters, 1996 | ||
| NDWI2 | Normalized Difference Water 2 Index | Gao, 1996 | ||
| NDII | Normalized Difference Infrared Index | Hardisky et al., 1993 |
[i] Source: own elaboration
Table 2
Sentinel-3 cloud-free satellite images of croplands in Wielkopolska. Actual state on 10. September 2019.
| Year | 2018 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month | July | August | July | August | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Day | 5 | 9 | 21 | 28 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 17 | 4 | 15 | 25 | 26 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 26 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
[i] Source: own elaboration

Figure 4
Time series of vegetation indices for maize and sugar beets during 2018–2019
Source: own elaboration

Figure 5
Sentinel-3 based land surface temperatures of maize and sugar beets during 2018–2019. The red crosses indicate mean, thin black lines median, green boxes 25%–75% ranges, black dots are outliers
Source: own elaboration

Figure 6
Maximum and mean temperatures, as well as total precipitation, noted in 2018 at the meteorological station in the town of Kornik
Source: own elaboration

Figure 7
Maximum and mean temperature, as well as total precipitation, noted in 2019 at the meteorological station in the town of Kornik
Source: own elaboration
Table 3
Results of correlation analysis of ground measured ChlF and Vis (red color – results with the highest correlation coefficient)
| Assessment | Vegetation Index | Maize | Sugar beets | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R coefficient | MAE | RMSE | p-value | R coefficient | MAE | RMSE | p-value | ||
| Assessment of the general condition of vegetation | CTVI | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.445 | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.204 |
| DVI | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.315 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.320 | |
| EVI | 0.61 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.005 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.106 | |
| GEMI | −0.26 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.275 | −0.25 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.394 | |
| GNDVI | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.767 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.226 | |
| IRECI | 0.64 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.003 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.447 | |
| MSAVI | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.478 | 0.37 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.188 | |
| MSAVI2 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.478 | 0.37 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.188 | |
| NDREI1 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.579 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.213 | |
| NDREI2 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.815 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.223 | |
| NDVI | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.429 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.214 | |
| NRVI | −0.19 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.429 | −0.35 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.214 | |
| REIP | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.538 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.284 | |
| RVI | −0.17 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.478 | −0.37 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.188 | |
| SATVI | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.362 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.152 | |
| SAVI | 0.56 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.012 | 0.32 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.269 | |
| SLAVI | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.124 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.374 | |
| SR | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.233 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.479 | |
| TTVI | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.445 | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.478 | |
| TVI | 0.55 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.015 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.478 | |
| WDVI | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.315 | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.320 | |
| Assessment of photosynthetically active pigment | CLG | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.805 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.401 |
| CLRE | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.708 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.335 | |
| MCARI | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.141 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.377 | |
| MTCI | −0.01 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.980 | 0.38 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.186 | |
| S2REP | 0.46 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.046 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.125 | |
| Assessment of the amount of light used in photosynthesis | SIPI | −0.68 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.401 |
| ZMI | 0.54 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.017 | −0.13 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.665 | |
| Assessment of water content | DSWI | 0.64 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.003 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.460 |
| MNDWI | 0.54 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.017 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.751 | |
| NDWI | −0.07 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.767 | −0.35 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.226 | |
| NDWI2 | 0.37 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.120 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.251 | |
| NDII | 0.65 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.31 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.279 | |
[i] Source: own elaboration