Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Organizational and infrastructural solutions in creating competitive advantage of sustainable urban transport – Gdańsk case study Cover

Organizational and infrastructural solutions in creating competitive advantage of sustainable urban transport – Gdańsk case study

Miscellanea Geographica
Volume 22 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)
By: Grażyna Chaberek-Karwacka  
Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Anable, J 2005, ‘‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’? Identifying travel behavior segments using attitude theory’, Transport Policy vol. 12, pp. 65‑78. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X0400054X?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb> [25 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Van Audenhove, F-J, Dauby, L, Korniichuk, O & Pourbaix, J 2014, The Future of Urban Mobility 2.0. Imperatives to shape extended mobility ecosystems of tomorrow Arthur D. Little Lab. Available from: <FUM-Report_2014_final.indd>. [15 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Banister, D 2005, Unsustainable transport. City transport in the new century Routledge, London and New York.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Banister, D 2008, ‘The sustainable mobility paradigm’, Transport Policy vol. 15, pp. 73–80. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X07000820?via%3Dihub>. [25 January 2018]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Biuro Rozwoju Gdanska 2017 [Development Office in Gdansk], Projekt Studium uwarunkowań i kierunków zagospodarowania przestrzennego GdańskaProject Study of conditions and directions of spatial development in Gdansk Available from <http://www.brg.gda.pl/planowanieprzestrzenne/studium-uwarunkowan-i-kierunkowzagospodarowania-przestrzennego>. [23 October 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Broniarska, Z & Zakowska, L 2017, ‘Multi-criteria evaluation of public transport interchanges’, Transportation Research Procedia vol. 24, pp. 25‑32. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146517303447?via%3Dihub>. [18 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Dziadek, S 1991, Systemy transportowe ośrodków zurbanizowanychTransport systems of urban centers PWN, Warszawa.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. European Commission 2007, Green Paper. Towards a new culture for urban mobilityCOM(2007) 551 final Available from: <http://eur-lex.europa.eu>. [20 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. European Commission 2011, White Paper. Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system COM(2011) 144 final Available from: <http://eur-lex.europa.eu>. [20 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. European Commission 2013, ‘Attitudes of Europeans Towards Urban Mobility’, Special Eurobarometer, vol. 406. Available from <http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm> [25 October 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Fiorello, D, Martino, A, Zani, L, Christidis, P & Navajas-Cawood, E 2016, ‘Mobility data across the EU 28-member states: results from an extensive CAWI survey’, Transportation Research Procedia, vol 14, pp. 1104–1113. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352146516301831?via%3Dihub> [15 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Future of transport 2011,’The Gallup Organization analytical report for European Commission’, Flash Eurobarometer, vol. 312. Available from: <http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/flash/fl_312_en.pdf> [25 October 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Gdańskie Badanie Ruchu 2016, City of Gdańsk Report Available from: <http://www.gdansk.pl/urzad-miejski/Wyniki-Gdanskiego-Badania-Ruchu-2016,a,65107>. [16 October 2016].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Grava, S 2002, Urban Transportation System. Choices for Communities McGrow-Hill, New York.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Geoportal 2017. Available from: <http://www.geoportal.gov.pl/>. [25 August 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Google Maps LLC 2017, Google. Available from: < https://www.google.com/maps/>. [30 July 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Guglielmetti Mugion, R, Toni, M, Raharjo, H, Di Pietro, L & Petros Sebathu, S 2018, ‘Does the service quality of urban public transport enhance sustainable mobility?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 174, pp. 1566–1587. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617327105?via%3Dihub> [25 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Hautala, R, Karvonen, V, Laitinen, J, Laurikko, J, Nylund, N-O, Pihlatie, M, Rantasila, K & Tuominen, A 2014, ‘Smart sustainable mobility’, VTT Visions, vol. 5. Available from: <http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/visions/2014/V5.pdf> [18 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. He, M, Zhao, S & He, M 2016, ‘Tolerance threshold of commuting time: Evidence from Kunming, China’, Journal of Transport Geography vol. 57, pp. 1‑7. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692316305336>. [20 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Jakdojadę: rozkłady jazdy, bilety 2017, City-Nav Sp. z o.o.. Available from: <https://jakdojade.pl/>. [30 July 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kujala, R, Weckström, Ch, Mladenović, MN & Saramäki, J 2018, ‘Travel times and transfers in public transport: Comprehensive accessibility analysis based on Pareto-optimal journeys’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems vol. 67, pp. 41‑54. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0198971517300923?via%3Dihub>. [22 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Locus Map Free – Outdoor GPS nawigacja i mapyLocus Map Free - Outdoor GPS navigation and maps 2017, Asamm Software, s.r.o. Available from: <http://www.locusmap.eu/>. [30 July 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. NACTO 2011, Urban Bikeway Design Guide, Available from: <http://www.ocpcrpa.org/docs/projects/bikeped/NACTO_Urban_Bikeway_Design_Guide.pdf>. [25 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Raport o korkach w 7 największych miastach Polski Warszawa, Wrocław, Kraków, Poznań, Gdańsk, Łódź, Katowice [Report on traffic jams in the 7 largest Polish cities Warsaw, Wroclaw, Cracow, Poznan, Gdansk, Lodz, Katowice] 2016, Report by Deloitte and Targeo Available from: <https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/pl/Documents/Reports/pl_Raport_koszty_korkow_ najwieksze_polskie_miasta. pdf>. [20 August 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Sierpiński, G 2012, ‘Zachowania komunikacyjne osób podróżujących a wybór środka transportu w mieście’ [‚Communication behaviors of travelers and the choice of transport means in the city’], Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport [Scientific work of the Warsaw University of Technology. Transport] vol. 84, pp. 93 106.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Słodczyk, J 2012, Historia planowania i budowy miast [History of cities planning and construction], Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, Opole.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Szołtysek, J 2011, Kreowanie mobilności mieszkańców miastCreating mobility of urban residents Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. The Charter of European Planning 2013. The Vision for Cities and Regions – Territoires of Europe in the 21st Century, The European Council of Spatial Planners - le Conseil Européen des Urbanistes: Barcelona Available from: <http://www.ectp-ceu.eu/index.php/en/publications-8/the-charter-of-european-planning-213>. [18 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. United Nations 2017, New Urban Agenda. Quito Declaration on Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements for All, A/RES/71/256 Available from: <http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/New-Urban-Agenda-GA-Adopted-68th-Plenary-N1646655-E.pdf>. [25 January 2017].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Vincent-Geslin, S & Ravalet, E 2016, ‘Determinants of extreme commuting. Evidence from Brussels, Geneva and Lyon’, Journal of Transport Geography vol. 54, pp. 240‑247. Available from: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096669231630326X?via%3Dihub>. [20 January 2018].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Wyszomirski, O (ed.) 1999, Zarządzanie komunikacją miejskąPublic transport management Gdańska Fundacja Kształcenia Menadżerów, Gdańsk.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Wyszomirski, O (ed.) 2008, Transport miejski. Ekonomika i organizacjaUrban transport. Economics and organization Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2084-6118 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6046
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 203 - 209
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2018
Accepted on: Sep 17, 2018
Published on: Dec 5, 2018
Published by: Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Sustainable urban transport,
organizational solutions in urban transport,
urban transport infrastructure,
bicycle commuting
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography,
Geosciences, other

© 2018 Grażyna Chaberek-Karwacka, published by Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2018): Issue 4 (December 2018)Next article