References
- Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press.
- Archetti, C. (2013). Understanding terrorism in the age of global media: A communication approach, Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bateman, J. (2023). Deepfakes and synthetic media in the financial system: Assessing threat scenarios, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/07/11/deepfakes-and-synthetic-media-in-financial-system-assessing-threat-scenarios-pub-90196
- Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics, Oxford University Press.
- Bjola, C., & Pamment, J. (Eds.). (2019). Countering online propaganda and extremism: The dark side of digital diplomacy, Routledge.
- Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2023). Generative AI at work, NBER Working Paper No. 31161., National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Buchanan, B., Lohn, A., Musser, M., & Sedova, K. (2021). Truth, lies, and automation: How language models could change disinformation, Center for Security and Emerging Technology, Georgetown University.
- Cadwalladr, C. & Graham-Harrison, E. (2018, March 17). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach, The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cam-bridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election
- Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press.
- Cihon, P., Maas, M. M., & Kemp, L. (2021). Fragmentation and the future: Investigating architectures for international AI governance, Global Policy, 12(S6), 15–26.
- Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence, Yale University Press.
- Cull, N. J. (2019). Public diplomacy: Foundations for global engagement in the digital age, Polity Press.
- DiResta, R. & Goldstein, J. A. (2024). How spammers and scammers leverage AI-generated images on Facebook for audience growth, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12838.
- Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm, Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
- Entman, R. M. (2008). Theorizing mediated public diplomacy: The U.S. case, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102.
- Epstein, Z., Hertzmann, A., & Akten, M. (2023). Art and the science of generative AI, Science, 380(6650), 1110–1111.
- Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.), Longman.
- Farrell, H. & Newman, A. L. (2019), Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
- Freelon, D. & Lokot, T. (2020). Russian Twitter disinformation campaigns reach across the political spectrum, Misinformation Review, 1(1).
- Freelon, D. & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as political communication, Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156.
- Galeotti, M. (2018). The Vory: Russia’s super mafia, Yale University Press.
- Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media, Yale University Press.
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience, Harvard University Press.
- Goldstein, J. A., Chao, J., Grossman, S., Stamos, A., & Tomz, M. (2023). How persuasive is AI-generated propaganda? PNAS Nexus, 3(1), pgad034.
- Graphika. (2023). Deepfake it till you make it: How Russia is using Ai-generated content in Ukraine information operations. https://graphika.com/reports/
- Hosseinmardi, H., Ghasemian, A., Rivera-Lanas, M., Horta Ribeiro, M., West, R., & Watts, D. J. (2024). Causally estimating the effect of YouTube’s recommender system usingcounterfactual bots, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313377121
- Hallahan, K. (1999). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations, Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), 205–242.
- Hayden, C. (2012). The rhetoric of soft power: Public diplomacy in global contexts, Lexington Books.
- Helmus, T. C., Kepe, M., & Knack, A. (2023). Assessing Russian reactions to U.S. and allied security assistance to Ukraine, RAND Corporation.
- Hern, A. (2022, March 25). TikTok’s algorithm pushes Russia-Ukraine war content to millions, The Guardian.
- Hutchings, S. & Szostek, J. (2015). Dominant narratives in Russian political and media discourse during the Ukraine crisis. In A. Pikulicka-Wilczewska & R. Sakwa (Eds.), Ukraine and Russia: People, politics, propaganda and perspectives, E-International Relations, 183–196.
- Kreps, S., McCain, R. M., & Brundage, M. (2022). All the news that’s fit to fabricate: Ai-generated text as a tool of media misinformation, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 9(1), 104–117.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press.
- Lanoszka, A. (2016). Russian hybrid warfare and extended deterrence in eastern Europe, International Affairs, 92(1), 175–195.
- Maas, M. M. (2019). How viable is international arms control for military artificial intelligence? Three lessons from nuclear weapons, Contemporary Security Policy, 40(3), 285–311.
- Mattern, J. B. (2005). Why ‘soft power’ isn’t so soft: Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 583–612.
- McCombs, M. E. & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.
- Melissen, J. (Ed.) (2005). The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations, Palgrave Macmillan.
- NATO. (2009). NATO Strategic Communications Policy (SG(2009)0794), North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
- Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.
- Noy, S. & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence, Science, 381(6654), 187–192.
- Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft power, Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171
- Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics, PublicAffairs.
- Paul, C. (2011). Strategic communication: Origins, concepts, and current debates, Praeger,
- Pomerantsev, P. (2019). This is not propaganda: Adventures in the war against reality, PublicAffairs.
- Pomerantsev, P. & Weiss, M. (2014). The menace of unreality: How the Kremlin weaponizes information, culture and money, The Interpreter/Institute of Modern Russia.
- Putin, V. (2014, March 18). Address by President of the Russian Federation [Speech transcript], Kremlin.ru. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603
- Rand Corporation. (2019). Cognitive security: Protecting the mind, Rand Corporation Research Brief.
- Sanovich, S. (2017). Computational propaganda in Russia: The origins of digital misinformation, Computational Propaganda Project, 1–25.
- Schiller, H. I. (1976). Communication and cultural domination, M. E. Sharpe.
- Shannon B. (2023, May 22). Fake viral images of an explosion at the Pentagon were probably created by AI, NPR. https://www.npr.org/2023/05/22/1177590231/fake-viral-images-of-an-explosion-at-the-pentagon-were-probably-created-by-ai
- Stanford HAI (Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence) (2024). Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024, Stanford University.
- Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure, American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.
- Szostek, J. (2017). The power and limits of Russia’s strategic narrative in Ukraine: The role of linkage, Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 379–395.
- Thussu, D. K. (2006). International communication: Continuity and change (2nd ed.), Hodder Arnold.
- Walker, C. & Ludwig, J. (2017). The meaning of sharp power: How authoritarian states project influence, Foreign Affairs.
- Woolley, S. C. & Howard, P. N. (2016). Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents, International Journal of Communication, 10, 4882–4890.
- Woolley, S. C. & Howard, P. N. (Eds.) (2018). Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media, Oxford University Press.
- Yablokov, I. (2015). Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: The case of Russia Today (RT), Politics, 35(3-4), 301–315.
Language: English, Hungarian, Romanian
Page range: 59 - 80
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
Published by: Medea Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Liu Qingtao, published by Medea Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.