Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Adapting to Thrive: Operation Management Capabilities and Flexibility Effects on Procurement Performance among Manufacturing Firms in Ghana Cover

Adapting to Thrive: Operation Management Capabilities and Flexibility Effects on Procurement Performance among Manufacturing Firms in Ghana

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Hypothesised conceptual framework

Source: own processing

Table 1.

Constructs and sources

ConstructNumber of itemsSource
Process efficiency capability5Yeung (2008)
Process integration capability3Yeung (2008)
Organizational flexibility8Zhou & Wu (2010)
Procurement performance5Rorich (2015)

1 Source: own processing

Table 2.

Construct validity

Process efficiency capabilityFactor loadings
SB1 <- Process efficiency capability0.705
SB2 <- Process efficiency capability0.759
SB3 <- Process efficiency capability0.689
SB4 <- Process efficiency capability0.840
SB5 <- Process efficiency capability0.861
Process integration capabilityFactor loadings
SB8 <- Process Integration capability0.510
SB9 <- Process Integration capability0.886
SB10 <- Process Integration capability0.942
Operational FlexibilityFactor loadings
SC1 <- Operational flexibility0.842
SC2 <- Operational flexibility0.814
SC3 <- Operational flexibility0.832
SC4 <- Operational flexibility0.823
SC5 <- Operational flexibility0.680
SC6 <- Operational flexibility0.639
SC7 <- Operational flexibility0.718
SC8 <- Operational flexibility0.766
Procurement PerformanceFactor loadings
SD1 <- Procurement Performance0.664
SD2 <- Procurement Performance0.889
SD3 <- Procurement Performance0.685
SD6 <- Procurement Performance0.507
SD7 <- Procurement Performance0.853

1 Source: own processing

Table 3.

Reliability statistics and convergent validity

ConstructCronbach's alphaComposite reliability (rho_a)Composite reliability (rho_c)Average variance extracted (AVE)
Process Integration capability0.7580.9170.8370.644
Process efficiency capability0.8320.8580.8810.599
Procurement Performance0.7770.8330.8480.537
Operational flexibility0.8990.9040.9190.589

1 Source: own processing

Table 4.

Discriminant validity using Fornell-Lacker criterion

ConstructProcess integration capabilityProcess efficiency capabilityProcurement performanceStrategic flexibility
Process Integration capability0.803
Process efficiency capability0.3760.774
Procurement Performance0.3930.7460.733
Operational flexibility0.4760.8280.6900.768

1 Source: own processing

Table 5.

Multicollinearity statistics using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF)

ConstructVIFConstructVIFConstructVIF
SB11.554SC16.318SD11.801
SB102.082SC25.512SD24.055
SB22.159SC35.042SD31.925
SB32.223SC43.688SD61.722
SB42.692SC52.643SD72.999
SB52.567SC62.361
SB81.295SC72.246
SB91.887SC84.462

1 Source: own processing

Figure 2.

Structural model

Source: own processing

Table 6.

Hypothesis testing

Hypothesesβ-valuet-statisticsp-values
Process Integration capability -> Procurement Performance0.0951.2550.210
Process efficiency capability -> Procurement Performance0.5645.0740.000
Operational flexibility x Process Integration capability -> Procurement Performance-0.0831.4390.150
Operational flexibility x Process efficiency capability -> Procurement Performance-0.0882.3680.018

1 Source: own processing

Language: English
Page range: 148 - 167
Submitted on: Dec 27, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 27, 2025
Published on: Jun 25, 2025
Published by: Scoala Nationala de Studii Politice si Administrative
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Joseph Kwasi AGBEKA, Bismark Stephen KUMAH, Mawuli SENANU, Sampson AFRIFA JNR, published by Scoala Nationala de Studii Politice si Administrative
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.