Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Control-Plane Placement and Memory Substrates in Modern Agentic AI: A Comparative Method for Prompt-Native Systems, Agent Shells, and Durable Runtimes Cover

Control-Plane Placement and Memory Substrates in Modern Agentic AI: A Comparative Method for Prompt-Native Systems, Agent Shells, and Durable Runtimes

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Liu, J. (2026, March 3). LlamaIndex is more than a RAG framework: It is agentic document processing. LlamaIndex. https://www.llamaindex.ai/blog/llamaindex-is-more-than-a-rag-framework.
  2. Pan, L., Zou, L., Guo, S., Ni, J., & Zheng, H.-T. (2026). Natural-language agent harnesses [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25723
  3. Zhou, C., Chai, H., Chen, W., Guo, Z., Shan, R., Song, Y., . . . & Zhang, W. (2026). Externalization in LLM agents: A unified review of memory, skills, protocols and harness engineering [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.08224
  4. Yue, L., Bhandari, K. R., Ko, C.-Y., Patel, D., Lin, S., Zhou, N., … & Pan, S. (2026). From static templates to dynamic runtime graphs: A survey of workflow optimization for LLM agents [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22386
  5. Rombaut, B. (2026). Inside the scaffold: A source-code taxonomy of coding agent architectures. [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.03515
  6. Anthropic. (2026, January 9). Demystifying evals for AI agents. https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/demystifying-evalsfor-ai-agents.
  7. Anthropic. (2025–2026). Claude Code materials, including How Claude Code works, Create custom subagents, Agent SDK overview, and Modifying system prompts. https://code.claude.com/docs/en/how-claude-code-works (documentation set).
  8. GitHub / Microsoft / VS Code team. (2025–2026). Copilot agent-mode and coding-agent materials, including Introducing GitHub Copilot agent mode (preview), Local agents in Visual Studio Code, and About GitHub Copilot cloud agent. https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs/2025/02/24/introducing-copilot-agent-mode (documentation set).
  9. OpenAI. (2025–2026). Agents SDK and workflow tooling materials, including the Building agents track, Agents SDK guide, Agent Builder guide, and Results and state guide. http://developers.openai.com/tracks/building-agents (documentation set).
  10. Google. (2025–2026). Agent Development Kit (ADK) materials, including workflow agents, callbacks, and skills documentation. https://google.github.io/adk-docs/agents/workflow-agents/ (documentation set).
  11. Cline. (2025–2026). Documentation and repository materials, including Plan & Act docs and prompt architecture. https://docs.cline.bot/ (see also the project repository at https://github.com/cline/cline/)
  12. Anomalyco. (2026). OpenCode repository and session-runtime sources. https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode
  13. QwenLM. (2025–2026). Qwen Code materials, including Approval Mode, Subagents, Settings, and repository docs. https://qwenlm.github.io/qwen-code-docs/en/users/features/approval-mode/ (documentation set).
  14. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E. H., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903
  15. Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022). ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03629
  16. Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T. L., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023). Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.10601
  17. Besta, M., Blach, N., Kubicek, A., Gerstenberger, R., Podstawski, M., Gianinazzi, L., … & Hoefler, T. (2023). Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.09687
  18. Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., Hallinan, S., Gao, L., Wiegreffe, S., … & Clark, P. (2023). Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17651
  19. Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023). Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11366
  20. Dhuliawala, S., Komeili, M., Xu, J., Raileanu, R., Li, X., Celikyilmaz, A., & Weston, J. (2023). Chain-of-verification reduces hallucination in large language models [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.11495
  21. Fricke, F., Malberg, S., & Groh, G. (2026). Framework of thoughts: A foundation framework for dynamic and optimized reasoning based on chains, trees, and graphs. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Structured Understanding, Retrieval, and Generation in the LLM Era (SURGeLLM 2026) (pp. 132–151). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.surgellm-1.8
  22. Plaat, A., Wong, A., Verberne, S., Broekens, J., van Stein, N., & Bäck, T. (2025). Multi-step reasoning with large language models: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 58(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3774896
  23. Bondarenko, A., Zamorskaia, N., Djakons, D., Djakona, A., & Djakons, R. (2026). Rapid evolution of agentic AI: From framework labels to control surfaces [Short overview]. Riga Nordic University.
  24. SWE-bench project. (2024–2026). Official benchmark materials, including the SWE-bench leaderboard and mini-SWE-agent. https://www.swebench.com/ (benchmark site and mini-SWE-agent materials).
  25. Merrill, M. A., Shaw, A. G., Carlini, N., Li, B., Raj, H., Bercovich, I., . . . & Schmidt, L. (2026). Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking agents on hard, realistic tasks in command line interfaces [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11868
  26. Dao, M.-D., Le, Q. M., Lam, H. T., Le, D.-T., Pham, Q.-V., O’Sullivan, B., & Nguyen, H. D. (2026). Agentic design patterns: A system-theoretic framework [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.19752
  27. Milosevic, Z., & Rabhi, F. (2026). Architecting agentic communities using design patterns [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03624
  28. Xu, W., Wang, Y., Mei, K., Liang, K., Wang, Z., Jin, M., … & Metaxas, D. N. (2026). MemGym: A long-horizon memory environment for LLM agents [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20833
  29. Wu, D., Wang, H., Yu, W., Zhang, Y., Chang, K.-W., & Yu, D. (2024). LongMemEval: Benchmarking chat assistants on long-term interactive memory [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.10813
  30. Maharana, A., Lee, D.-H., Tulyakov, S., Bansal, M., Barbieri, F., & Fang, Y. (2024). Evaluating very long-term conversational memory of LLM agents [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.17753
  31. He, Z., Wang, Y., Zhi, C., Hu, Y., Chen, T.-P., Yin, L., … & Pentland, A. (2026). MemoryArena: Benchmarking agentmemory in interdependent multi-session agentic tasks [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.16313
  32. Shen, Y., Li, K., Zhou, W., & Hu, S. (2026). Mem2ActBench: A benchmark for evaluating long-term memory utilization in task-oriented autonomous agents [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.19935
  33. Li, X., Liu, Y., Chen, W., You, B., Di, Z., He, Y., . . . & Song, D. (2026). SkillsBench: Benchmarking how well agent skills work across diverse tasks [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.12670
  34. Zhu, J., Wu, J., Hu, M., Zhu, S., Pan, J., Shen, W., … & Xu, M. (2026). SWE Context Bench: A benchmark for context learning in coding [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08316
  35. pi.dev/Zechner, M. (2025–2026). Pi coding agent materials, including the official site and architectural write-up on explicit artifact memory. https://pi.dev/ (see also https://mariozechner.at/posts/2025-11-30-pi-coding-agent/)
  36. Nous Research. (2026). Hermes Agent official materials. https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/
  37. Honcho. (2026). Honcho design patterns and memory-service architecture materials. https://honcho.dev/docs/v3/documentation/core-concepts/design-patterns
  38. Sumers, T. R., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2023). Cognitive architectures for language agents [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.02427
  39. Packer, C., Wooders, S., Lin, K., Fang, V., Patil, S. G., Stoica, I., & Gonzalez, J. E. (2023). MemGPT: Towards LLMs as operating systems [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.08560
  40. Du, P. (2026). Memory for Autonomous LLM Agents: Mechanisms, evaluation, and emerging frontiers. [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07670
  41. Nous Research. (2026). Hermes Agent memory documentation. https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/docs/user-guide/features/memory
  42. Fang, J., Xu, B., Wang, Z., Cao, H., Deng, X., Dong, B., … & Zhang, N. (2026). Rethinking memory as continuously evolving connectivity [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28773
  43. Chen, H., Zhang, Z., Pei, W., He, B., Wu, M., Zeng, J., … & Zhang, H. (2026). MemForest: An efficient agent memory system with hierarchical temporal indexing [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.23986
  44. Latimer, C., Boschi, N., Neeser, A., Bartholomew, C., Srivastava, G., Wang, X., & Ramakrishnan, N. (2025). Hindsight is 20/20: Building agent memory that retains, recalls, and reflects [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.12818
  45. Yu, Y., Yao, L., Xie, Y., Tan, Q., Feng, J., Li, Y., & Wu, L. (2026). Agentic memory: Learning unified long-term and short-term memory management for large language model agents [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.01885
  46. OpenClaw project. (2026). OpenClaw repository and platform materials. https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw
  47. obra. (2025–2026). superpowers repository. https://github.com/obra/superpowers
  48. glebis. (2025–2026). claude-skills repository. https://github.com/glebis/claude-skills
  49. Anthropic. (2025–2026). skills repository and marketplace materials. https://github.com/anthropics/skills
  50. GitHub. (2025–2026). awesome-copilot repository. https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot
  51. LangChain. (2025–2026). LangGraph materials, including the LangGraph overview, persistence docs, and workflowsand-agents documentation. https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langgraph/overview (documentation set).
  52. Deus Data. (2026). codebase-memory-mcp: High-performance code intelligence MCP server with persistent knowledge graph. https://github.com/DeusData/codebase-memory-mcp (see also the preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27277).
  53. Shamsi, S. (2026). graphify: AI coding assistant skill for building queryable knowledge graphs from any codebase. [Computer software]. GitHub. https://github.com/safishamsi/graphify.
  54. CocoIndex. (2026). cocoindex-code: Lightweight embedded AST-based code search engine and MCP server for coding agents. [Computer software]. GitHub. https://github.com/cocoindex-io/cocoindex-code.
  55. Li, X., Ben-Israel, N., Raz, Y., Ahmed, B., Serebro, D., & Raux, A. (2026). RepoMod-Bench: A benchmark for code repository modernization via implementation-agnostic testing [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.22518
  56. Heule, S., Jia, E., & Jain, N. (2025, November 6). Improving agent with semantic search. Cursor. https://cursor.com/blog/semsearch
  57. Agarwal, A., & Peet, C. (2025, November 19). How we’re making GitHub Copilot smarter with fewer tools. The GitHub Blog. https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/githubcopilot/how-were-making-github-copilot-smarter-with-fewer-tools/
  58. Anthropic. (2026, February 5). Quantifying infrastructure noise in agentic coding evals. https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/infrastructure-noise
  59. Wu, D., Ji, Z., Kawatkar, A., Kwan, B., Gu, J.-C., Peng, N., & Chang, K.-W. (2026). LongMemEval-V2: Evaluating long-term agent memory toward experienced colleagues [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.12493
  60. Wang, H., Mang, Q., Cheung, A., Sen, K., & Song, D. (2026, April 8). How we broke top AI agent benchmarks: And what comes next. Berkeley RDI. https://rdi.berkeley.edu/blog/trustworthy-benchmarks-cont/
  61. Anthropic. (2024, November 25). Introducing the Model Context Protocol. https://www.anthropic.com/news/model-context-protocol
  62. Zietsman, C. (2026). The specification as quality gate: Three hypotheses on AI-assisted code review [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25773
  63. Żywot, A., Chen, X., Yuan, Y., Søgaard, A., & de Rijke, M. (2026). Can small agents collaborate to beat a single large language model? [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11327
  64. Kulkarni, S., & Kulkarni, Y. (2026). Benchmarking multi-agent LLM architectures for financial document processing: A comparative study of orchestration patterns, cost-accuracy tradeoffs and production scaling strategies [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22651
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2026-0036 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8896 (formerly 0868-8257) | Journal ISSN: 0868-8257
Language: English
Page range: 46 - 64
Published online: Sep 21, 2026
Published in print: Oct 1, 2026
Published by: Institute of Physical Energetics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 A. Bondarenko, N. Zamorskaia, D. Djakons, A. Djakona, R. Djakons, published by Institute of Physical Energetics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.