Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Probabilistic Characterisation of Service Lifetime of Ageing Infrastructures Cover

Probabilistic Characterisation of Service Lifetime of Ageing Infrastructures

By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel. (2024, September 18). New VUB chair to explore future-proof transport infrastructure: Chair Agile and Future-proof Infrastructure for Transport (A-FIT). https://www.vub.be/en/news/newvub-chair-explore-future-proof-transport-infrastructure
  2. University of Waterloo. (2004). NSERCUNENE Chair in risk-based life cycle management of engineering systems.
  3. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. (2021). SMARTer maintenance of road infrastructure. https://www.ntnu.edu/smartermaintenance
  4. Fondation Université Savoie Mont Blanc. (n.d.). Chaire Montagne, infrastructures, risques et environnement (MIRE) [Mountain infrastructure, risk, and environment]. https://www.fondation-usmb.fr/chairespartenariales/chaire-mire/
  5. Polytech Clermont. (n.d.). HEPHAESTUS training and research chair. https://sioulepatrimoine.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/HEPHAESTUS.pdf
  6. Baroth, J., Michaud, V., Estevez, R., & Isaac, A. (2023, October 25–26). Remaining useful life of hydraulic steel structures under high-cycle fatigue [Conference paper]. 63rd ESReDA Seminar, Ispra, Italy, 25–26 October 2023. https://fondation-grenoble-inp.fr/nos-actions/chaire-medelia/
  7. MIAI Cluster, Université Grenoble Alpes. (2025, September 17). PRISM: Predictive risk-informed asset strategic management. https://prism.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/
  8. Chahrour, N., Nasr, M., Tacnet, J. M., & Bérenguer, C. (2021). Deterioration modeling and maintenance assessment using physics-informed stochastic Petri nets: Application to torrent protection structures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 210, 107524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107524
  9. Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, du Développement durable et de la Mer. (2010). Instruction technique pour la surveillance et l’entretien des ouvrages d’art (ITSEOA).
  10. Deutsches Institut für Normung. (1999). DIN 1076:1999-11: Ingenieurbauwerke im Zuge von Straßen und Wegen— Überwachung und Prüfung [Engineering structures in connection with roads— Inspection and test]. Beuth Verlag.
  11. Agredo Chávez, A., Gonzalez-Libreros, J., Wang, C., & Sas, G. (2024). Bridge condition index: A review of methodologies used in bridge management systems. In J. S. Jensen,
  12. D. M. Frangopol, & J. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Bridge maintenance, safety, management, digitalization and sustainability: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS 2024) (pp. 1130–1137). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003483755-131
  13. Federal Highway Administration. (n.d.). LTBP InfoBridge. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://infobridge.fhwa.dot.gov/
  14. Michez, T., Peyras, L., Lambert, S., Reynaud, S., & Garcin, P. (2026). Qualitative modelling of failure scenarios for long linear transport infrastructures in mountain areas. Infrastructures, 11(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11020071
  15. Capacci, L., Biondini, F., & Frangopol, D. M. (2022). Resilience of aging structures and infrastructure systems with emphasis on seismic resilience of bridges and road networks: Review. Resilient Cities and Structures, 1(2), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.05.001
  16. Nirandjan, S., Koks, E. E., Ye, M., Pant, R., Van Ginkel, K. C. H., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Ward, P. J. (2024). Review article: Physical vulnerability database for critical infrastructure hazard risk assessments – A systematic review and data collection. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 24(12), 4341–4368. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4341-2024
  17. Porter, K. A. (2021). A beginner’s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk. University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.sparisk.com/pubs/Porter-beginners-guide.pdf
  18. Kennedy, R. P., Cornell, C. A., Campbell, R. D., Kaplan, S., & Perla, H. F. (1980). Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 59(2), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(80)90203-4
  19. Mohamed Nazri, F. (2018). Seismic fragility assessment for buildings due to earthquake excitation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7125-6.
  20. Ghannoum, M., Imtiaz, A., Grange, S., Causse, M., Cornou, C., & Baroth, J. (2020). Behavior of a RC frame under differential seismic excitation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 24(5), 705–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1453398
  21. Monette, P., Joly, P., Roux, V., & Thiry, J.-M. (2009, August 9–14). Longevity curves for probabilistic lifetime assessment [Conference paper]. 20th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 20), Division 7, Paper 1684, Espoo, Finland.
  22. European Committee for Standardization. (2005). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-9: Fatigue (EN 1993-1-9:2005).
  23. British Standards Institution. (2019). Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures (BS 7910:2019). https://doi.org/10.3403/30369478
  24. Thomas, O. O., Chouinard, L., & Langlois, S. (2022). Probabilistic fatigue fragility curves for overhead transmission line conductor-clamp assemblies. Frontiers in Built Environment, 8, Article 833167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.833167
  25. Sharma, H., & Swamy, A. K. (2016). Development of probabilistic fatigue curve for asphalt concrete based on viscoelastic continuum damage mechanics. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9(4), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.07.004
  26. Savin, O., Baroth, J., Badina, C., Charbonnier, S., & Bérenguer, C. (2021). Damage due to start-stop cycles of turbine runners under high-cycle fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue, 153, 106458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106458
  27. Rocher, B., Schoefs, F., François, M., Salou, A., & Caouissin, A.-L. (2020). A two-scale probabilistic time-dependent fatigue model for offshore steel wind turbines. International Journal of Fatigue, 136, 105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105620
  28. Shahid, C. S., Zainal, Z. A., Yusoff, N. I. M., Mohammad, N., Zamzuri, Z. H., & Widyatmoko, I. (2025). Stochastic-based pavement performance and deterioration models: A review of techniques and applications. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 120, 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.02.033
  29. Harb, K., Baroth, J., Estevez, R., Isaac, A., & Michaud, V. (2025, March 20–21). Probabilistic fatigue analysis of mechanically welded structures [Conference presentation]. IIW Commission XIII Intermediate Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany.
  30. European Committee for Standardization. (2002). Eurocode: Basis of structural design (EN 1990:2002).
  31. Estes, A. C., Frangopol, D. M., & Foltz, S. D. (2004). Updating reliability of steel miter gates on locks and dams using visual inspection results. Engineering Structures, 26(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.10.007
  32. Kühn, B., Lukić, M., Nussbaumer, A., Günther, H.-P., Helmerich, R., Herion, S., … & Bucak, Ö. (2008). Assessment of existing steel structures: Recommendations for estimation of remaining fatigue life (EUR 23252 EN; JRC43401). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2026-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8896 (formerly 0868-8257) | Journal ISSN: 0868-8257
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 45
Published online: Sep 21, 2026
Published in print: Oct 1, 2026
Published by: Institute of Physical Energetics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 J. Baroth, L. Zemite, R. Djakons, published by Institute of Physical Energetics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.