References
- 1. Misra, R., Acharya, S., & Sahoo, S.K. (2010). Cancer Nanotechnology: Application of Nanotechnology in Cancer Therapy. Drug Discov Today, 15, 842–850.10.1016/j.drudis.2010.08.006
- 2. Verhaegen, F., & Seuntjens, J. (2003). Monte Carlo Modelling of External Radiotherapy Photon Beams. Phys Med Biol, 48, 107–164.10.1088/0031-9155/48/21/R01
- 3. Palmer, A., Bradley, D., & Nisbet, A. (2012). Physics-Aspects of Dose Accuracy in High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy: Source Dosimetry, Treatment Planning, Equipment Performance and In Vivo Verification Techniques. J Contemp Brachytherapy, 4, 81–91.10.5114/jcb.2012.29364
- 4. Yohannes, I., Kolditz, D., & Langner O. (2012). A Formulation of Tissue-and Water-Equivalent Materials Using the Stoichiometric Analysis Method for CT-Number Calibration in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning. Phys Med Biol, 57, 1173–1190.10.1088/0031-9155/57/5/1173
- 5. Yazdani, M., & Mowlavi, A.A. (2007). Determining TG-43 Brachytherapy Dosimetry Parameters and Dose Distribution for a 131Cs Source Model CS-1. Iran J Radiat Res, 5, 85–90.
- 6. Chandola, R.M., Tiwari, S., & Kowar, M.K. (2010). Effect of In-Homogeneities and Source Position on Dose Distribution of Nucletron High Dose Rate Ir-192 Brachytherapy Source by Monte Carlo Simulation. J Cancer Res Ther, 6, 54–57.10.4103/0973-1482.63567
- 7. Hsu, S.M, Wu, C.H., & Lee, J.H. (2012). A Study on the Dose Distributions in Various Materials from an Ir-192 HDR Brachy-therapy Source. PLoS One, 7, e44528.10.1371/journal.pone.0044528
- 8. ICRU Report No. 44. (1989). Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. ICRU, Bethesda.
- 9. Fadhil, F., Abdalsattar, H., & Rajaa, M. (2017). Calculating the X-ray Attenuation Coefficients of Gelatin as Human Tissue Substitute. Austr J Bas and Appl Sci, 21–29.
- 10. Kurudirek, M., & Özdemir, Y. (2011). Energy Absorption and Exposure Buildup Factors for Some Polymers and Tissue Substitute Materials: Photon Energy, Penetration Depth and Chemical Composition Dependence. J Radiol Prot, 31 (1), 117–28.10.1088/0952-4746/31/1/008
- 11. Gupta, S., & Sidhu, G.S. (2014). Computation of Mass Attenuation Coefficient, Energy Absorption and Exposure Build-Up Factors for Teeth in the Energy Range 0.015–15 MeV up to 40 mfp. IJETR, 2 (7).
- 12. Hopkins, D.N. (2010). Determination of the Linear Attenuation Coefficient and Buildup Factors of MCP-96 Alloy for Use in Tissue Compensation and Radiation Protection [Master Thesis]. USA: Ball State University Muncie.
- 13. Hubbell, J.H, & Seltzer, S.M. (1997). Tables of X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients (version 1.03) (online). Available at http://physics.nist.gov/xaamdi. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. Originally published as NISTIR 5632, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
- 14. Gerward, L., Guilbert, N., Jensen, K.B., & Levring H. (2001). X-ray Absorption in Matter. Reengineering XCOM. Rad Phys Chem, 60, 23–24.10.1016/S0969-806X(00)00324-8
- 15. Hubbell, J.H., & Seltzer, S.M. (1995). Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z ¼ 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology.10.6028/NIST.IR.5632
- 16. ICRP. (2003). Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection (vol. 89). Reference values. ICRP publication.