Reliability of Latvian Power System’S 330 KV Substations

Nepomnyaschiy, V.; Gerhards, J.; Mahnitko, A.; Lomane, T.

doi:10.2478/lpts-2014-0016

Abstract

Substation reliability is always a topical problem. The authors consider the techniques for reliability calculation based on logical-probabilistic approach to the evaluation of electrical substation switchgear schemes and equipment at emergency situations with disconnections of individual elements of the substation equipment or false operation of relay protection and automation devices. Based on the reliability analysis made for the 330kV substations of Latvian Electric Power System, recommendations are given concerning the reconstruction of switchgear schemes for some substations

References

1. Mjasnikov, A. V., & Nepomnyaschiy, V. A. (1970). Definition of probabilistic criteria of reliability for electrical connection diagrams of stations and substations. Proceedings of VNIIE, 37, 201-221. Moscow: Energy (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
2. Billinton, R., & Allan, R.N. (1992). Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems (2nd ed-n). New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-0685-4
Search in Google Scholar
3. Voropaj, N. I., Kovalev, G. F., & Kucherov, Y. N. (2013). The concept of providing the reliability in the electric power. Мoscow: Energy, p. 304 (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
4. Nepomnyaschiy, V. A. (1978). Accounting of reliability in the design of energy systems. Мoscow: Energy, p. 200. (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
5. Nepomnyaschiy, V. A. (2012). The operational reliability for elements of 1150-35 kV electrical networks. Мoscow: Energoexpert,Vol. 4, pp. 26 - 40 (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
6. Handbook for designing electrical networks (editor Fajbisovich D. L.).(2012). Мoscow: ENAS, p. 376 (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
7. Oboskalov, V. P. (2012). Structural reliability of electric power systems. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, p. 195 (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
8. Nepomnyaschiy, V. A. (2013). Reliability of the equipment for power systems. Мoscow: Electric Power Industry, p. 196 (in Russian).
Search in Google Scholar
9. Moshkin, I., Berjozkina, S., & Sauhats, A. (2012). Solving of Transmission Network Development Tasks in Market and Uncertainty Conditions. Proceedings of the 9th Intern. Conf. on European Energy Market. Florence (Italy), pp. 1-7.10.1109/EEM.2012.6254750
Search in Google Scholar
10. Sauhats, A., Chuvychins, V., Zalostiba, D., Antonov, E., & Strelkovs, V. (10-14.06.2012). Risks, Load Shedding and System Separation during Emergency Situations. Proceedings of the IEEE 12th Intern. Conf. on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems. Istanbul (Turkey), pp. 911-916.
Search in Google Scholar
11. Sauhats, A., Chuvychin, V., Antonovs, E., Zicmane, I., & Strelkovs, V. (8-11 May 2011). Interconnection of power systems with different under-frequency load shedding schemes. Proceedings of EEEIC2011. Rome (Italy), pp. 1- 4.10.1109/EEEIC.2011.5874864
Search in Google Scholar
12. Sauhats, A., Kucajevs, J., Leite, L., Bockarjova, G., & Utans, A. (8-11 May 2011). Out-of-step automation device model validation methodology. Proceedings of EEEIC2011, Rome (Italy), pp.1-6. 10.1109/EEEIC.2011.5874606
Search in Google Scholar

Reliability of Latvian Power System’S 330 KV Substations

Abstract

Paradigm

My account