Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing and Explaining Road Network Performance in Data-scarce Contexts: The Case of the Constantine Metropolis in Eastern Algeria Cover

Assessing and Explaining Road Network Performance in Data-scarce Contexts: The Case of the Constantine Metropolis in Eastern Algeria

By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Medjitna, W. (2023). Analytical study of the transport problem in the city of Constantine (North-East of Algeria). Technium Social Sciences Journal 40(1), 454-472. DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v40i1.8429.
  2. Fan, S. & Chan-Kang, C. (2005). Road development, economic growth, and poverty reduction in China (Research Report No. 138). International Food Policy Research Institute. DOI: 10.2499/0896291413rr138.
  3. Fancello, G., Carta, M. & Fadda, P. (2014). A modeling tool for measuring the performance of urban road networks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 111, 559–566. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.089.
  4. Li, S. & Zhou, Y. (2024). Integrating equity and efficiency into urban logistics resilience under emergency lockdowns. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 183, 103446. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103446.
  5. Zhang, T., Chen, A., Huang, H.-J. & He, S. (2023). Equity analysis and improvement in transportation resilience optimisation at the pre-event stage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 122, 103985. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103892.
  6. Geurs, K.T. & Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 12(2), 127–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
  7. Gleyze, J.-F. (2009). The evaluation of traffic networks in quantitative geography: Relevance and contributions of a structural approach based on path analysis (In French, L’évaluation des réseaux de circulation en géographie quantitative Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie 115, 35–44. DOI: 10.4000/nda.671.
  8. Rivera-Gonzalez, C. & Amaral, J.C. (2024). Assessment of freight accessibility in New York City: A spatial-temporal approach. Journal of Transport Geography 114, 103777. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103777.
  9. Hassan, M., Abdullah, M., Ismail, A. & Rahman, N. (2025). Assessing public transit network efficiency and accessibility in Johor Bahru and Penang, Malaysia: A data-driven approach. Results in Engineering 17, 101234. DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106126.
  10. Chen, A., Yang, H., Lo, H.K. & Tang, W.H. (2002). Capacity reliability of a road network: An assessment methodology and numerical results. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 36(3), 225–252. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00048-5.
  11. Casali, Y. & Heinimann, H.R. (2019). A topological analysis of growth in the Zurich road network. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 75, 244–253. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.01.010.
  12. Patarasuk, R. (2013). Road network connectivity and land-cover dynamics in Lop Buri province, Thailand. Journal of Transport Geography 28, 111–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.011.
  13. Hawbaker, T.J., Radeloff, V.C., Clayton, M.K., Hammer, R.B. & Gonzalez-Abraham, C.E. (2005). Road density and landscape pattern in relation to housing density, land ownership, land cover, and soils. Landscape Ecology 20, 609–625. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-004-5647-0.
  14. Gao, X., Liu, J., Zhang, L. & Wang, H. (2025). Road network expansion and landscape dynamics in the Chaohu Lake wetland: A 20-year analysis. Ecological Indicators 173, 110221. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113443.
  15. Geurs, K.T. & van Eck, J.R. (2003). Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: The implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30(1), 69–88. DOI: 10.1068/b12940.
  16. Martínez, F.J. (1995). Access: The transport-land use economic link. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 29(6), 457–470. DOI: 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00014-5.
  17. Horner, M.W. (2004). Exploring metropolitan accessibility and urban structure. Urban Geography 25(3), 264–284. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.25.3.264.
  18. Hansen, W.G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25(2), 73–76. DOI: 10.1080/01944365908978307.
  19. Debbabi, S. (2021). Urban polycentricity: For the restructuring of a fragmented territory, the case of the urban agglomeration of Constantine (In French, la polycentralité urbaine: pour la restructuration d’un territoire fragmenté, le cas du groupement urbain de Constantine) Constantine 3, University Press.
  20. Sietchiping, R., Permezel, M.J. & Ngomsi, C. (2012). Transport and mobility in sub-Saharan African cities: An overview of practices, lessons and options for improvements. Cities 29(3), 183–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.005.
  21. Bashingi, N., Mostafa, M. & Das, D.K. (2020). The state of congestion in the developing world: The case of Gaborone, Botswana. Transportation Research Procedia 45, 434–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.036.
  22. National Statistics Office (ONS). (2021). Annual situation of the national vehicle fleet (in French, la situation annuelle nationale du parc automobile). Retrieved May 25, 2025, from https://www.ons.dz/spip.php?rubrique25
  23. David, Q. & Kilani, M. (2022). Transport policies in polycentric cities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 166, 302–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.017.
  24. Gleyze, J.-F. (2001). Networks, territories and accessibility (in French, réseaux, territoires et accessibilité). Institut Géographique National, COGIT Laboratory. DOI: 10.4000/nda.671.
  25. Kaddouri, L. (2004). Spatial structures and city networking for regionalization of territories (in French, Structures spatiales et mises en réseaux de villes pour la régionalisation des territoires) (Doctoral dissertation, Paul Valéry University – Montpellier III). Retrieved December 13, 2024, from https://inria.hal.science/tel-00137931/
  26. Adalıoğlu, İ. & Ergün, M. (2025). Evaluating multimodal travel choices through MGWR: Insights from the Ankara-Istanbul corridor. Travel Behaviour and Society 28, 100–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101045.
  27. Stepniak, M. & Rosik, P. (2013). Accessibility improvement, territorial cohesion and spillovers: A multidimensional evaluation of two motorway sections in Poland. Journal of Transport Geography 31, 154–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.017.
  28. Kezič, M.E.L. & Durango-Cohen, P.L. (2012). The transportation systems of Buenos Aires, Chicago and Sao Paulo: City centers, infrastructure and policy analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 46(1), 102–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.007.
  29. Smith, D. (2011). Polycentricity and sustainable urban form: An intra-urban study of accessibility, employment and travel sustainability for the strategic planning of the London region (Doctoral dissertation, University College London). Retrieved August 16, 2025, from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1324180
  30. Huai, Y., Lo, H.K. & Ng, K.F. (2021). Monocentric versus polycentric urban structure: Case study in Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 151, 99–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.05.004.
Language: English
Page range: 116 - 127
Submitted on: Jul 25, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 9, 2026
Published on: Jul 8, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Sami Debbabi, published by Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.