References
- Amphaeris, J., Shannon, G., and Tenbrink, T., 2021. Cognitive Linguistics Support for the Evolution of Language from Animal Cognition. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43, pp. 2609-2615.
- Beger A., Smith, T. H., 2020. Introduction. In Beger A., Smith, T. H. (Eds.), How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1-37.
- Bird, J., 2020. BlueWorldTV, available at: https://www.youtube.com/@BlueWorldTV.
- Bybee, J.L. and Beckner, C. 2015. Usage-Based Theory. In B. Heine and H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis 2. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp.953–980.
- Byrne, R.A., Kuba M.J., Mather, J.A., et al., 2006. Does Octopus Vulgaris Have Preferred Arms?. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(3), 198–204, available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.120.3.198.
- Caleidoskopable, 2017. Mimic Octopus (Thaumoctopus mimicus). iNaturalist, available at: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/201121147.
- Castro, L., Wasserman, E., 2012. Animal Cognition. In Ramachandran V.S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior 2, 145–153, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-375000-6.00024-0.
- Cienki, A., 2008. Why Study Metaphor and Gesture?, In Cienki A., Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 5–25.
- Colombetti, G., 2014. The feeling body affective science meets the enactive mind, Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
- Dahl, C.D, Adachi, I., 2013. Conceptual Metaphorical Mapping in Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes).
- eLife, available at: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00932.
- Delahaye, Pauline. 2019. A Semiotic Methodology for Animal Studies. Biosemiotics 19. Springer Cham, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28813-6.
- Eco, Umberto. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics (Advances in Semiotics). Sebeok T. A. (Ed.), Bloomington, Indiana UP.
- El-Hani, C.N., Queiroz J., Stjernfelt, F., 2009. Firefly Femmes Fatales: A Case Study in the Semiotics of Deception. Biosemiotics 3(1), 33–55, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-009-9048-2.
- Evans, V., Green, M., 2006. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
- Fabbri-Destro, M, Rizzolatti, G., 2008. Mirror Neurons and Mirror Systems in Monkeys and Humans. Physiology 23(3), 171–79, available at: https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00004.2008.
- Fauconnier, G., Turner, M., 2003. Conceptual Blending, Form and Meaning. Recherches en Communication 19, 57-86.
- Favareau, D, Kull, K., Wheeler, W., et al. 2017. How Can the Study of the Humanities Inform the Study of Biosemiotics?. Biosemiotics 10(1), 9–31, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-017-9287-6.
- Fiorito, G., Affuso, A., Anderson, et al., 2014. Cephalopods in Neuroscience: Regulations, Research and the 3Rs. Invertebrate Neuroscience 14(1), 13–36, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10158-013-0165-x.
- Forceville, C.J., Urios-Aparisi, E., 2009. Introduction. In Forceville, C.J., Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3-14, available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.
- Gallese, V., Lakoff, G., 2005. The Brain’s concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3-4), 455–479, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310.
- Geeraerts, D., Cuyckens, H., 2010. Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford University Press, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0001.
- Gibbs, R.W., 2005. Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination. In Pecher, D., Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.), Grounding Cognition. The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–91.
- Gibbs, R.W., 2008. Metaphor and Gesture. Some Implications for Psychology. In Cienki A., Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 291–301.
- Givón, T., 2002. The Visual Information-Processing System as an Evolutionary Precursor of Human Language. In Givón, T., Malle, B.F. (Eds.), The Evolution of Language out of Pre-Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 3-50.
- Gómez-Moreno, J.M.U., 2014. The Role of Image Schemas and Superior Psychic Faculties in Zoosemiosis. Biosemiotics 7(3), 405–427, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9200-5.
- Gómez-Moreno, J.M.U., 2019. The ‘Mimic’ or ‘Mimetic’ Octopus? A Cognitive-Semiotic Study of Mimicry and Deception in Thaumoctopus Mimicus. Biosemiotics 12(3), 441–467, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-019-09362-y.
- Gómez-Moreno, J.M.U., 2020. Non-Verbal and Multimodal Metaphors Bring Biology into the Picture. In Beger A., Smith, T. H. (Eds.), How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 175–207.
- Gutnick, T., Mather, J.A., Kuba, M.J., Shomrat, T., 2016. The Cephalopod Brain: Motion Control, Learning, and Cognition. In Saleuddin, S., Mukai, S. (Eds.), Physiology of Molluscs 2. New York: Apple Academic Press, pp. 137–177, available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315207117-5.
- Hoffmeyer, J., 2015. Introduction: Semiotic Scaffolding. Biosemiotics 8(2), 153–58, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9236-1.
- Hoffmeyer, J., Stjernfelt, F., 2015. The Great Chain of Semiosis. Investigating the Steps in the Evolution of Semiotic Competence. Biosemiotics 9(1), 7–29, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9247-y.
- How, M.J., Norman, M.D., Finn, J., et al., 2017. Dynamic Skin Patterns in Cephalopods. Frontiers in Physiology, 8:393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00393.
- Johnson, M., 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, London: The University Of Chicago Press. Klein, C.. n.d. 7 Fun Facts About The Majestic Mimic Octopus!, available at: https://octonation.com/mimic-octopus-facts/.
- Kövecses, Z., 2016. Conceptual metaphor theory. In Demjén, Z., Semino, E. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. London: Routledge, pp.31–45.
- Kövecses, Z., 2017. Levels of Metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2), 321–347.
- Kövecses, Z., 2020. An Extended View of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(1), 112–130, available at: https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00053.kov.
- Kövecses, Z., 2022. Some Recent Issues in Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Routledge EBooks, 29–41. available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003184041-3.
- Kuiter, R. (n.d.). Mimic Octopus mimicking Stingray Photo. Oceanwideimages.com, available at: https://oceanwideimages.com/Large-Image.asp?pID=6533&rp=search%252Easp%253Dmimic%Boctopus%256p%253D2.
- Kull, K., Emmeche, C., Favareau, D., 2008. Biosemiotic Questions. Biosemiotics 1(1), 41–55, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-008-9008-2.
- Kull, K., Velmenoza, E., 2015. Language, Linguistics: Life, Biosemiotics…. In Kull, K., Velmenoza, E., Cowley, S.J., Biosemiotic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics. Springer Cham, pp. 1–10.
- Kull, K., 2018. On the Logic of Animal Umwelten: The Animal Subjective Present and Zoosemiotics of Choice and Learning. Semiotics of Animals in Culture 17, 135–48, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72992-3_10.
- Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1980. METAPHORS We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G., 1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1), 39–74, available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39.
- Lakoff, G., 2014. Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:958, available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958.
- Langacker, R.W, 2005. Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning. In Pecher, D., Zwaan, R. A. (Eds.), Grounding Cognition. The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–197.
- Langacker, R.W., 2008a. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Langacker, R.W. 2008b. Metaphoric Gesture and Cognitive Linguistics. In Cienki A., Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 249–252.
- Le Bris, S., 2013. Mimic Octopus (Thaumoctopus mimicus). iNaturalist., available at: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/148472353.
- Lemmens, M., 2015. Cognitive Semantics. In Riemer N. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Semantics. London, New York: Routledge, pp. 90-105, available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/2589-6229_eslo_com_032520.
- Mandler, J.M., 1994. Precursors of Linguistic Knowledge. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 346(1315), 63–69, available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/56020.
- Mandler, J.M., 2007. On the Origins of the Conceptual System. American Psychologist 62(8), 741–51, available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.8.741.
- Maran, T., 2010. Becoming a Sign: The Mimic’s Activity in Biological Mimicry. Biosemiotics 4(2), 243–257, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9095-8.
- Maran, T., Kleisner, K., 2010. Towards an Evolutionary Biosemiotics: Semiotic Selection and Semiotic Co-Option. Biosemiotics 3(2), 189–200, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9087-8.
- Maran, T., Martinelli, D., Turovski, A., 2011. Readings in Zoosemiotics. Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter. Maran, T., 2014. Dimensions of Zoosemiotics: Introduction. Semiotica 198, 1–10, available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0098.
- Maran, T., 2015. Scaffolding and Mimicry: A Semiotic View of the Evolutionary Dynamics of Mimicry Systems. Biosemiotics 8(2), 211–22, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9223-y.
- Maran, T., 2017. Mimicry and Meaning: Structure and Semiotics of Biological Mimicry. London: Springer Nature.
- Martinelli, D., 2010. A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics: People, Paths, Ideas. Biosemiotics 5. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
- Mather, J.A., Kuba, M.J, 2018. Octopuses – Minds in the Water. In Bueno-Guerra, N., Amici, F. (Eds.), Field and Laboratory Methods in Animal Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 308–28.
- Mather, J.A., Kuba, M.J., 2013. The Cephalopod Specialties: Complex Nervous System, Learning, and Cognition. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91(6), 431–49, available at: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2013-0009.
- Mittelberg, I., 2006. Metaphor and Metonymy in Language and Gesture: Discourse Evidence for Multimodal Models of Grammar. PhD thesis, Cornell University, ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
- Mittelberg, I., 2008. Peircean Semiotics Meets Conceptual Metaphor: Iconic Modes in Gestural Representations of Grammar. In Cienki A., Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 115–154.
- Mittelberg, I., 2013. The Exbodied Mind: Cognitive-Semiotic Principles as Motivating Forces in Gesture. In Cienki A., Müller, C., Fricke, E., Ladewig, et al. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 38(1). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 750-779.
- Mittelberg, I., Hinnell, J., 2022. Gesture Studies and Semiotics. In Cobley, P. (Ed.), Semiotic Movements. Bloomsbury Semiotics 4. London: Bloomsbury Academic, (in press).
- Müller, C., 2008. What Gestures Reveal about the Nature of Metaphor. In Cienki A., Müller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 219–145.
- [n.a.], 2017. Mimic Octopus: Master of Disguise. YouTube, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wos8kouz810.
- Nad, M., 2008. The Indonesian Mimic Octopus. YouTube. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8oQBYw6xxc&t=4s&ab_channel=marcelnad.
- Nahmad-Rohen, L., Qureshi, Y.H., Vorobyev, M., 2022. The Colours of Octopus: Using Spectral Data to Measure Octopus Camouflage. Vision 6(4), 59-84, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/vision6040059.
- Norman, M.D., Julian. F., Tregenza, T., 2001. Dynamic Mimicry in an Indo–Malayan Octopus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268(1478), 1755–1758., available at: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1708.
- Olteanu, A., 2021. Multimodal Modeling: Bridging Biosemiotics and Social Semiotics. Biosemiotics 14, 783–805, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09463-7.
- Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A., 2005. Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. In Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A. (Eds.), Grounding Cognition. The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–7.
- Praszkier, R., 2014. Empathy, Mirror Neurons and SYNC. Mind & Society 15(1), 1–25., available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-014-0160-x.
- Rizzolatti, G., Fabbri-Destro, M., Gerbella, M., 2019. The Mirror Neuron Mechanism. In Stein, J. (Ed.), Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology.
- Sebeok, T.A., 2001. Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics 2. Toronto: University Of Toronto Press.
- Sharov, A. Tønnessen, M., 2021. Semiotic Agency: Science beyond Mechanism. Biosemiotics 25. Springer Cham, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89484-9.
- Shettleworth, S.J. 2001. Animal Cognition and Animal Behaviour. Animal Behaviour 61(2), 277–86 available at: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1606.
- Sonesson, G., 2012. Semiosis Beyond Signs. On Two or Three Missing Links on the Way to Human Beings. In Schilhab, T., Stjernfelt, F., Deacon, T. (Eds.), The Symbolic Species Evolved, London: Springer Nature, pp.81–93, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2336-8_5.
- Spivey, M.J., Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Richardson, D.C., 2005. On the Perceptual-Motor and Image-Schematic Infrastructure of Language. In Pecher, D., Zwaan, R.A. (Eds.), Grounding Cognition. The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–81.
- Stephen, M., 2021. Nine Brains Are Better Than One: An Octopus’ Nervous System. Biomechanics in the Wild. University of Notre Dame, available at: https://sites.nd.edu/biomechanics-in-the-wild/2021/04/07/nine-brains-are-better-than-one-an-octopus-nervous-system/.
- Stickles, E. 2016. The Interaction of Syntax and Metaphor in Gesture: A Corpus-Experimental Approach. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
- Stiefel, K., 2011. Mimic Octopus. Flickr. available at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/41059842@N03/6234370217.
- Stjernfelt, F., 2014. Dicisigns. Peirce’s semiotic doctrine of propositions. Synthese, 192(4), 1019–1054, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5.
- Talmy, L., 1988. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1), 49–100, available at : https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2.
- Thiebaud, S., 2023. Mimic Octopus (Thaumoctopus mimicus). iNaturalist., available at: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/153655025.
- Uexküll, J., Kriszat, G., 1956. Streifzüge Durch Die Umwelten von Tieren Und Menschen. Bedeutungslehre. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
- Vicente, P.N., 2020. Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In Merskin D.L. (Ed.), The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society 5. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 371-371, available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483375519.n145.
- Yong, E., 2009. The mimic octopus. ScienceBlogs, available at: https://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/12/13/the-mimic-octopus-my-first-ever-post.
- Zlatev, J., 2000. The Mimetic Origins of Self-Consciousness in Phylo-, Onto- and Robotogenesis. Industrial Electronics Society. 26th Annual Conference of the IEEE 4, 2921–28, available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2000.972462.
- Zlatev, J., 2008. The co-evolution of intersubjectivity and bodily mimesis. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sihna et al. (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 215–244.
- Zlatev, J., 2009. Levels of Meaning Embodiment and Communication. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 14(3-4), 149–74.
- Zlatev, J., 2018. Meaning making from life to language: The semiotic hierarchy and phenomenology. Cognitive Semiotics 11(1), 169–200, available at: . https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0001.
- Zlatev, J., Jacobsson, G., Paju, L., 2021. Desiderata for Metaphor Theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and Motion-Emotion Metaphoremes. In Da Silva, A.S., (Ed.), Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 41–74, available at: https://benjamins.com/catalog/ftl.11.02zla.