Can nonhumans speak? Languaging and worlds in posthumanist applied linguistics

Demuro, Eugenia; Gurney, Laura

doi:10.2478/lf-2023-0015

Abstract

This paper mobilises posthumanism as a way to theorise and articulate what language(s)/languaging may be for nonhuman animals. This is investigated via various concepts brought together: we turn to the ontological turn in anthropology to expand on what language is, or might be, amongst humans, and then discuss Umwelt and languaging as two possible modes of exploring ontologies and biosemiosis among nonhumans. The dialogue between posthumanism and biosemiosis is so far absent in the field of critical language studies. The aim, thus, is to contribute to the nascent field of posthumanist applied linguistics by tentatively linking discrete fields of enquiry for a productive exchange across disciplines, and to further the discussion of how nonhuman language is (or may be) ontologised.

References

Affifi, R., 2013. Learning plants: Semiosis between the parts and the whole. Biosemiotics, 6(3), 547–559. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9164-x >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Appleby, R., Pennycook, A., 2017. Swimming with sharks, ecological feminism and posthuman language politics. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2), 239–261. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1279545 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Augustyn, P., 2018. Animal studies in the language sciences. Biosemiotics, 11(1), 121–138. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9313-3 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barad, K., 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Becker, A. L., 1991. Language and languaging. Language & Communication, 11, 33–35.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., 2016. Why only us. Language and evolution. MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blaser, M., 2009. Political ontology. Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380903208023 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blaser, M., 2013. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1086/672270 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blaser, M., 2016. Is another cosmopolitics possible? Cultural Anthropology, 31(4), 545–570, available at: < https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bloome, D., Beauchemin, F., 2016. Languaging everyday life in classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65(1), 152–165. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336916661533 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braidotti, R., 2006. Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braidotti, R., 2013. The posthuman. Polity Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braidotti, R., 2019a. A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braidotti, R., 2019b. Transversal posthumanities. Philosophy Today, 63(4), 1181–1195. available at: < https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2020128318 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Callus, I., Herbrechter, S., 2012. Introduction: Posthumanist subjectivities, or, coming after the subject. Subjectivity, 5(3), 241–264. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.17 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Canagarajah, A. S., 2006. After disinvention: Possibilities for communication, community and competence. In Makoni, S., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters, pp. 233–239.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carrithers, M., Candea, M., Sykes, K. et al., 2010. Ontology is just another word for culture: Motion tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory. Critique of Anthropology, 30, 152–200, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09364070 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cerrone, M., 2018. Umwelt and ape language experiments: On the role of iconicity in the human-ape pidgin language. Biosemiotics, 11(1), 41–63. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9312-4 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chernela, J., 2018. Language in an ontological register: Embodied speech in the Northwest Amazon of Colombia and Brazil. Language & Communication, 63, 23–32. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.02.006 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cobley, P., 2016. Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Copson, A., 2015. What is humanism? In Copson, A., Grayling, A. C. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of humanism. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1–34.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cornips, L., van den Hengel, L., 2021. Place-making by cows in an intensive dairy farm: A sociolinguistic approach to nonhuman animal agency. In Bovenkerk, B., Keulartz, J. (Eds.), Animals in our midst: The challenges of co-existing with animals in the anthropocene. pp. 177–202.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., De Jaegher, H., 2015. From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1089–1125. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9404-9 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de la Cadena, M., Blaser, M. (Eds.), 2018. A world of many worlds. Duke University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dediu, D., Levinson, S. C., 2018. Neanderthal language revisited: Not only us. Current Opinions in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 49–55. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.001 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deely, J., 2015. Building a scaffod: Semiosis in nature and culture. Biosemiotics, 8, 341–360. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9237-0 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Continuum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Delgado, L. E., Romero, R. J., 2000. Local histories and global designs: An interview with Walter Mignolo. Discourse, 22, 7–33. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1353/dis.2000.0004 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Demuro, E., Gurney, L., 2021. Languages/languaging as world-making: The ontological bases of language. Language Sciences, 83, 1–13, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101307 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Errington, J., 1999. Ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 115–117. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.115 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Escobar, A., 2016. Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. available at: < https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Evans, N., Levinson, S. C., 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Faltýnek, D., Lacková, L., 2021. In the case of protosemiosis: Indexicality vs. iconicity of proteins. Biosemiotics, 14(1), 209–226.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ferrando, F., 2013. Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ferrando, F., 2016a. Humans have always been posthuman: A spiritual geneaology of posthumanism. In Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. R. (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures. Springer, pp. 243–256.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ferrando, F., 2016b. The Party of the anthropocene: Post-humanism, environmentalism and the post-anthropocentric paradigm shift. Relations: Beyond anthropocentrism, 4(2), 160–173.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gamble, C., 2011. The social and material life of Neanderthals. In Conard, N. J., Richter, J. (Eds.), Neanderthal lifeways, subsistence and technology: One hundred fifty years of Neanderthal study. Springer, pp. 157–166.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gaylard, R., 2004. “Welcome to the world of our humanity”: (African) humanism, ubuntu and black South African writing. Journal of Literary Studies, 20(3–4), 265–282. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710408530357 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guimarães, S. W. F., Silva, H. P., 2020. What have the revelations about Neanderthal DNA revealed about Homo sapiens? Anthropological Review, 83(1), 93–107. available at: < https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0008 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gurney, L., & Demuro, E., 2022. Tracing new ground, from language to languaging, and from languaging to assemblages: Rethinking languaging through the multilingual and ontological turns. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(3), 305–324. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1689982 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hauck, J. D., Heurich, G. O., 2018. Language in the Amerindian imagination: An inquiry into linguistic natures. Language & Communication, 63, 1–8. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.005 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Henare, A., Holbraad, M., Wastell, S., 2007. Introduction: Thinking through things. In Henare, A., Holbraad, M., Wastell, S. (Eds.), Thinking through things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically.: Routledge, pp. 1–31.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heywood, P., 2017. The ontological turn. Cambridge encyclopedia of anthropology, available at: < http://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn#h2ref-1 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holbraad, M., 2020. The shapes of relations: Anthropology as conceptual morphology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(6), 495–522, available at: < doi:10.1177/0048393120917917 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M. A., 2017. The ontological turn. Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hope, J., 2017. Various shapes of cultural biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 10(3), 397–411.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johansson, S., 2015. Language abilities in Neanderthals. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 311–332, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124945 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kohn, E., 2015. Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 311–327. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kubota, R., Miller, E. R., 2017. Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2–3), 129–157. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lee, Y. T., 2003. Daoistic humanism in ancient China: Broadening personality and counseling theories in the 21st century. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(1), 64–85.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Letiche, H., 2017. Bewildering pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 14(3), 236–255. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2017.1335662 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Levinson, S. C., Evans, N., 2010. Time for a sea-change in linguistics: Response to comments on ‘The myth of language universals’. Lingua, 120(12), 2733–2758. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.08.001 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewis, G., Jones, B., Baker, C., 2012. Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655–670. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718490 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewis, S. L., Maslin, M. A., 2015. Defining the anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171–180. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, W., 2018. Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Love, N., 2004. Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26(6), 525–544. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lyons, N., 2019. Signs in the dust: A theory of natural culture and cultural nature. Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Makoni, S., Pennycook, A., 2006. Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In Makoni, S., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–41.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maturana, H. R., 1970. Biology of cognition. BCL Report # 9.0. University of Illinois.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., 1987. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (revised edition) (R. Paolucci, Trans.). Shambhala Publications, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Orman, J., 2013. New lingualisms, same old codes. Language Sciences, 37, 90–98. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.12.001 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pedersen, M., 2012. Common Nonsense: A Review of Recent Reviews of the ‘Ontological Turn’. Anthropology of this Century, 5. available at: < http://aotcpress.com/articles/common_nonsense/ >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pennycook, A., 2018a. Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–461. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pennycook, A., 2018b. Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pepperberg, I. M., 2017. Animal language studies: What happened? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 181–185. available at: < https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1101-y >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peters, M. A., 2015. The humanist bias in Western philosophy and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(11), 1128–1135. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.991497 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryan, J. C., 2020. Writing the lives of plants: Phytography and the botanical imagination. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 35(1), 97–122. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2020.1720181 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sebeok, T., 2010. Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation and prospects. In Favareau, D. (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary. Springer, pp. 217–236.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L. et al., 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., McNeill, J. R., 2007. The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steffen, W., Rockström J., Richardson, K. et al., 2018. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 8252–8259, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tallerman, M., 2014. No syntax saltation in language evolution. Language Sciences, 46, 207–219. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.08.002 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thibault, P. J., 2017. The reflexivity of human languaging and Nigel Love’s two orders of language. Language Sciences, 61, 74–85. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.014 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tønnessen, M., 2015. Umwelt and language. In Velmezova, E., Kull, K., Cowley, S. J. (Eds.), Biosemiotic perspectives on language and linguistics. Springer, pp. 77–96.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Uexküll, J., 2010. Foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With a theory of meaning. University of Minnesota Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. et al., 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Viveiros de Castro, E., 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488. available at: < https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Viveiros de Castro, E., 2004. Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 463–484. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-7299066 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Viveiros de Castro, E., 2015. Who Is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33(1), 2, available at: < https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330102 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wallin, J., 2013. One hundred trillion anomals take the stand. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 11–13, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2013.789993 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wolfendale, P., 2019. The reformatting of Homo Sapiens. Angelaki, 24(1), 55–66.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woolard, K. A., Schieffelin, B. B., 1994. Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Can nonhumans speak? Languaging and worlds in posthumanist applied linguistics

Abstract

Paradigm

My account