Ornament as a formalist object

Tchougounnikov, Serge

doi:10.2478/lf-2023-0007

Abstract

This study deals with folkloric research object within Germanic and Russian Formalism, it shows why folklore and ornament have become an ideal research object of the European formalist current in Germanic and Slavic areas.

References

Barasch, M., 1998. Modern Theories of Art, 2. From Impressionisme to Kandinsky. New York & London: New York University Press. Shklovsky [Šklovskij], V., 1990 [1916]. Iskustvo kak priëm In Chklovski [Šklovskij] V., Gamburgskij sčët. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel’, pp. 58–72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ejxenbaum, B., 1969 [1918]. Kak sdelana sinel’ Gogolja. In Striedter, J. (Ed.), Texte der russischen Formalisten, Vol. 1. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 128–156.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helmholtz, H. von, 1896. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Hamburg, Leipzig.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helmholtz, H. von, 1998[1921]. Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie. Wien, New York, Berlin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Iversen, M., 1993. Alois Riegl: Art History and Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jakobson, R., 1985. Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kornienko, O., 2008. Ritmičeskaja paradigma ornamental’noj prozy Borisa Pil’njaka (Golyj god). Russkaja literatura, No. ХII, 43–64, available at: < http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Soc_Gum/Rli/2008_12/kornienko.pdf >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kornienko, O., 2009. Ritmičeskaja paradigma ornamental’noj prozy Borisa Pil’njaka (Golyj god). Russkaja literatura. No. ХIII, available at : < http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Soc_Gum/Rli/2009_13/kornienko.pdf >.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Majetschak, S., 2009. Die Sichbarkeit des Bildes und der Anblick der Welt, über einige Anregungen Konrad Fiedlers für die Bild- und Kunsttheorie. In Sachs-Hombach, K. (Ed.), Bildtheorien, Anthropologische und kulturelle Grundlagen des Visualistic Turn. Suhrkamp, pp. 167–170.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Medvedev, P., (Bakhtin, M.), 1978 [1928]. The Formal Method in European Art Scholarship: A Critical Introduction to Sociological Poetics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merrill, J. E., 2012. The Role of Folklore Study in the Rise of Russian Formalist and Czech Structuralist Literary Theory. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Olin, M., 1992. Form of representation in Alois Riegl’s Theory of Art. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riegl, A., 1977 [1893]. Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik. Mittenwald, Mäanderkunst Verlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riegl, A., 1966. Historische Grammatik der bildenden Künste. Graz: Böhlaus. See also Riegl, A., 1978. Grammaire historique des arts plastiques. Paris: Klincksieck.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riegl, A., 1973 [1927]. Die spätrömische Kunstindustrie nach den Funden in Österreich-Ungarn. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seuffert, B., 1909. Beobachtungen über dichterische Komposition. In Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift. Heidelberg, Carl Winter, pp. 599–617.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shklovsky [Šklovskij], V., 1929. O teorii prozy (On the theory of prose). Moscow: Federacija.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shklovsky [Šklovskij], V., 1973 [1929]. La prose ornementale. In Chklovski V., Sur la théorie de la prose. Lausanne: Editions L’âge d’homme, pp. 245–269.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shklovsky [Šklovskij], V., 1990 [1916]. Iskustvo kak priëm In Chklovski [Šklovskij] V., Gamburgskij sčët. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel’, pp. 58–72
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schissel von Fleschenberg, O., 1910. Novellenkomposition in E. T. A. Hoffmans Elixieren des Teufels’. Ein prinzipieller Versuch. In Schissel von Fleschenberg, O., Glonar, J., Rhetorische Forschungen, Vol. 1. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schissel von Fleschenberg, O., 1912. In Schissel von Fleschenberg, O., Glonar, J., Rhetorische Forschungen, Vol. 1. Schissel von Fleschenberg, O., Novellenkränze Lukians. Halle: Max Niemeyer
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romand, D., Tchougounnikov, S., 2009. Aux origines allemandes du cognitivisme, introduction. In Romand, D., Tchougounnikov S., Psychologie allemande et sciences humaines en Russie: anatomie d’un transfert culturel (1860-1930). Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines 21. Paris: EHESS, pp. 3–27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Romand, D., Tchougounnikov, S., 2010. Le formalisme russe, une séduction cognitiviste. Cahiers du Monde russe, In Berelowitch, W., Espagne M. (Eds.), Sciences humaines et sociales en Russie à l’Âge d’argent: quelques figures de transferts, pp. 521–546.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmidt, W., 2003. Narratologija [Narratologie]. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wundt, W., 1863. Vorlesungen über die Menschen- und Thierseele, Vol. 2. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wundt, W., 1900. Völkerpsychologie. Die Sprache, Vol. 1. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Ornament as a formalist object

Abstract

Paradigm

My account