Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘Oh, semiotics? Umberto Eco and stuff like that?’ Telling and constructing a discourse of marginality Cover

‘Oh, semiotics? Umberto Eco and stuff like that?’ Telling and constructing a discourse of marginality

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. Angermuller, J., 2013. How to become an academic philosopher. Academic discourse as a multileveled positioning practice. Sociología Histórica, 2, 263–289.
  2. Archer, L., 2008. Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity Studies in Higher Education 33(4): 385–403.10.1080/03075070802211729
  3. Bamberg, M., 1997. Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 335–342.10.1075/jnlh.7.42pos
  4. Bamberg, M., 2004. Considering counter-narratives. In Bamberg, M., Andrews, M. (Eds.), Considering counter-narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense. Amsterdam: John Benjamins., pp. 351–371.10.1075/sin.4.43bam
  5. Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D., 2011. Discourse and identity construction. In Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S., & Vignoles, V. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 177–199.10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_8
  6. Baynham, M., 2011. Stance, positioning, and alignment in narratives of professional experience. Language in Society 40(1). 63–74.10.1017/S0047404510000898
  7. Becher, T., Trowler, P., 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of the Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/Open University Press.
  8. Bergen, B. K., Plauché, M., 2001. Voilà voilà: Extensions of Deictic Constructions in French. In Cienki, A., Luka, B., & Smith, M. (Eds.). Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 238–249.
  9. Bertrand, D., 2014. La sémiotique en France: chronique 2014. Signata 3, available at: < http://journals.openedition.org/signata/1360 >.
  10. Biglari, A., 2014. Entretiens sémiotiques. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas.
  11. Blanche-Benveniste, C., 2003. Le double jeu du pronom on. In Berré, M. (Ed.), La syntaxe raisonnée: Mélanges de linguistique générale et française offerts à Annie Boone à l’occasion de son 60e anniversaire. Louvainla-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur, pp. 41–56.10.3917/dbu.berre.2003.01.0041
  12. Bouissac, P., 2021. The endless frontiers of semiotics. In: International Congress of the German Association of Semiotics. [Video], available at:< https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InIJwWeLH1s >.
  13. Bruner, J. S., 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  14. Bucholtz, M., Hall, K., 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7, pp. 585–614.10.1177/1461445605054407
  15. Carranza, I. E. 1998. Low-Narrativity Narratives and Argumentation. Narrative Inquiry 8(2): 287-317.10.1075/ni.8.2.04car
  16. Colley, H., James. D., 2005. Unbecoming tutors: Towards a more dynamic notion of professional participation. Paper presented at Changing teacher roles, identities and professionalism, May 16, at King’s College London.
  17. Cobley, P., Bankov, K., 2016. Vistas for organized global semiotics. Semiotica, 211 (1/4). 9–18, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0093 >.
  18. Cobley, P., Deely, J., Kull, K. et al., 2011. Semiotics continues to astonish. Thomas Sebeok and the doctrine of signs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110254389
  19. Danesi, M., 2012. The institutionalization of semiotics in North America. Signata, 3, 187–198, available at: < http://doi.org/10.4000/signata.871 >.10.4000/signata.871
  20. Darras, B., 2012. Qui sont les sémioticiens et que font-ils ? Enquête sur leurs relations avec le design et des médias. Signata, 3, 27–46, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.792 >.
  21. Davies, B., Harré, R., 2001. Positioning: the discursive production of selves. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. (Eds), Discourse theory and practice. London: Sage.
  22. Deely, J., 2015a. Semiotics ‘Today’: The Twentieth-Century Founding and Twenty-First Century Projects. In Trifonas, P. P. (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics. New York: Springer, pp.29–114.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_2
  23. Deely, J., 2015b. What semiotics is. Language and Semiotic Studies, 1(1), 63–94.
  24. De Fina, A., 2013. Positioning level 3. Connecting local identity displays to macro social processes. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 40–61, available at:< http://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23.1.03de >.10.1075/ni.23.1.03de
  25. Deppermann, A., 2015. Positioning. In De Fina, A., Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis. UK: Blackwell, pp. 369–387.10.1002/9781118458204.ch19
  26. Eco, U., 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2
  27. Foucault, M., 1966. Les mots et les choses: une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
  28. Foucault, M., 1969. L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
  29. Gaines, Elliot 2015. Understanding the Codes and Assumptions of New Media. In Peter P. Trifonas (Ed.), International Handbook of Semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer, 369–376.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_16
  30. Gee, J. P., 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method. London, UK: Routledge.
  31. Gee, J. P., 2008. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203944806
  32. Greimas, A. J., 1976. Sémiotique et sciences sociales. Paris: Seuil.
  33. Greimas, A. J., Courtés, J., 1983. Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.
  34. Haidar, J., 2006. Debate CEU-Rectoría. Torbellino pasional de los argumentos. Mexico City: UNAM.
  35. Holmes, J., 2006. Workplace narratives, professional identity and relational practice. In De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. (Eds.), Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 166–187.10.1017/CBO9780511584459.009
  36. Huutoniemi, K., 2010. Evaluating interdisciplinary research. In Frodeman, R., Thompson Klein, J., & Mitcham, C. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 309–320.
  37. Kull, K., 2008. The importance of semiotics to University: Semiosis makes the world locally plural. In Deely, J., Sbrocchi, L. G. (Eds.). Semiotics 2008: Specialization, Semiosis, Semiotics. Ottawa: Legas, pp. 494−514.10.5840/cpsem200833
  38. Kull, K., Maran, T., 2013. Journals of semiotics in the world. Sign Systems Studies, 41(1), 140–145, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2013.41.1.08 >.10.12697/SSS.2013.41.1.08
  39. Kull, K., Välli, K., 2011. Semiotics for university: semiosis makes the world locally plural. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 5 (1), 246–272, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2011-0120 >.
  40. Kull, K., Salupere, S., Torop, P. et al., 2011. The institutionalization of semiotics in Estonia. Sign Systems Studies, 39 (2/4), 314–342, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.13 >.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.13
  41. Kull et al., 2015. A hundred introductions to semiotics, for a million students: Survey of semiotics textbooks and primers in the world. Sign Systems Studies, 43 (2/3), 281–346, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2015.43.2-3.0 >.10.12697/SSS.2015.43.2-3.0
  42. Li, Y., 2006. The epistemological turn in semiotic strategy: from signs in the natural/cultural world to the semantic institutions of academic discourses. Semiotica, 162(1/4), pp. 175–193.10.1515/SEM.2006.076
  43. Lotman. J., 2000. Universe of the Mind. A semiotic theory of culture. London: Tauris.
  44. Lucius-Hoene, Gabriele and Deppermann, Arnulf 2000. Narrative identity empiricized a dialogical and positioning approach to autobiographical research interviews. Narrative Inquiry 10(1): 199–222.10.1075/ni.10.1.15luc
  45. Nöth, W., 2010. The semiotics of teaching and the teaching of semiotics. In Semetsky, I. (Ed.), Semiotics education experience. Rotterdam: Sense, pp. 1–20.10.1163/9789460912252_002
  46. Pessoa de Barros, D. L., 2012. Directions et rôles de la sémiotique en Amérique du Sud: Premières réflexions. Signata, 3, 131–160, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.844 >.
  47. Peirce, C. S., 1998. The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings (1893-1913). Volume 2. USA: The Peirce Edition Project. Cited in text as CP.
  48. Posner, R., 2003. Semiotics and other interdisciplinary approaches. In Posner, R., Robering, K., & Sebeok, T. A. (Eds.), A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 2342–2374.
  49. Posner, R., Robering, K., & Sebeok, T. A., 2003. A Handbook on the Sign-Theoretic Foundations of Nature and Culture. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  50. Rastier, F., 2001. Sémiotique et sciences de la culture. Linx, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/linx.1058 >.
  51. Ricoeur, P., 2004. Parcours de la reconnaissance. Trois études. France: Stock.
  52. Riessman, C. K., 2005. Narrative Analysis. In Kelly, N., Horrocks, Ch., Milnes, K. et al. (Eds.), Narrative, Memory & Everyday Life. UK: University of Huddersfield, pp. 1–1 7, available at: < http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/4920/ >.
  53. Salupere, S., 2011. Semiotics as science. Sign Systems Studies, 39 (2/4), 271–289, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.11 >.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.11
  54. Schegloff, E. A., 2007. ‘Categories in action: person-reference and membership categorization’. Discourse Studies, 9(4), 433–461.10.1177/1461445607079162
  55. Sebeok, Thomas A. 1976. Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs. Bloomington: Indiana University, and Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
  56. Slembrouck, S., 2015. The role of the researcher in interview narratives. In De Fina, A., Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.). The handbook of narrative analysis. UK: Blackwell, pp. 239–254.10.1002/9781118458204.ch12
  57. Søreide, G. E., 2006. Narrative construction of teacher identity: Positioning and negotiation. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 527–547.10.1080/13540600600832247
  58. de Saussure, F., 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. France: Payot.
  59. Tarasti, E., 2012. Can semiotics be organized? Observations over a 40-year period. Signata, 3, 199–215, available at: < https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.883 >.
  60. Torop, P., 1998. Semiotics in Tartu. Sign Systems Studies, 26, 9–19.10.12697/SSS.1998.26.00
  61. Weingart, P., 2010. A Short history of knowledge formations. In Frodeman, R. et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–14.
  62. Wortham, S., Reyes. A., 2015. Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315735207
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 48
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2021
Accepted on: May 1, 2022
Published on: Jul 9, 2022
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2022 Eduardo Chávez Herrera, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.