Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Semiotic Threshold: Animals and People Cover

Semiotic Threshold: Animals and People

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Burlak, A.,2013. Languages, DNA, relationship and contacts. Journal of Language Relationship: International Scientific Periodical, 9, 55—67, available at: 10.31826/jlr-2013-090108
  2. Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth R. M., 1998. Why Animals Don’t Have Language. In G. B. Peason (Ed.), The Tanner lectures on human values, Salt Like Sity, UT: University of Utah Press. 174—209., available at:
  3. Cimatti, F., 2016. Wittgenstein on animal (human and non-human) languages. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 15, 42—59, ISSN 1841-2394, available at:
  4. Costa, P., 2017. The Language Animal: A Long Trajectory. Dialogue 56(4), 621—632, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217317000774, https://www.academia.edu/35736726/The_Language_Animal_A_Long_Trajectory?sm=a>10.1017/S0012217317000774
  5. Dediu, D., Levinson, S. C., 2018. Neanderthal language revisited: not only us. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 49—55, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.001>,
  6. Delahaye, P., 2018. Zoosemiotics 2.0. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 31(3), 707—714, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9563-z>, 10.1007/s11196-018-9563-z
  7. Favareau, D., 2015. Symbols are Grounded not in Things, but in Scaffolded Relations and their Semiotic Constraints (Or How the Referential Generality of Symbol Scaffolding Grows Minds. Biosemiotics, 8(2), 235—255.10.1007/s12304-015-9234-3
  8. Frohlich, D. R., 2014. Biology, Peirce, and Biosemiotics: Commentaires ‘Cénoscopic’ d’unBiologiste. The American Journal of Semiotics, 30(1-2), 173—188, available at: 10.5840/ajs2014301/27
  9. Hockett, C. F., 1960. Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In Lanyon, W. E.; Tavolga, W. N. (Eds.), Animals sounds and animal communication. American Institute of Biological Sciences, 392—430.
  10. Hoffmeyer, J., 2008. Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.
  11. Hutto, D. D., 2009. ToM Rules, but It Is Not OK. In: Leudar I., Costall A. (eds) Against Theory of Mind. London. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 221—238.10.1057/9780230234383_12
  12. Hutto, D. D., 2009. Folk Psychology as Narrative Practice. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(6—8), 9—39.
  13. Jaroš, F., Maran, T., 2019. Humans on top, humans among the other animals: Narratives of anthropological difference. Biosemiotics, 12(3), 381—403, available at: 10.1007/s12304-019-09364-w
  14. Jaroš, F., Pudil, M., 2020. Cognitive Systems of Human and Non-human Animals: At the Crossroads of Phenomenology, Ethology and Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics 13(2), 155—177, available at: 10.1007/s12304-020-09387-8
  15. Kull, K., 2009. Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics, 4 (Spring), 8—27. available at: 10.3726/81608_8
  16. Kull, K., 2010. Umwelt and modelling. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics (pp. 43—56). London, New York: Routledge>
  17. Kull, K., 2014. Zoosemiotics is the study of animal forms of knowing. Semiotica, 2014(198), 299—310, available at: 10.1515/sem-2013-0101
  18. Kull, K., 2018. Biosemiotics by Giorgio Prodi: A postscript. In: Cimatti, Felice, A Biosemiotic Ontology: The Philosophy of Giorgio Prodi. (Biosemiotics 18.), Berlin: Springer, 135—147, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97903-8 https://www.academia.edu/37955881/Biosemiotics_by_Giorgio_Prodi_A_Postscript>
  19. Kull, K., 2019. Steps towards the natural meronomy and taxonomy of semiosis: Emon between index and symbol? Sign Systems Studies 47(1/2), 88—104, available at: <https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2019.47.1-2.03 https://www.academia.edu/39765119/Steps_towards_the_natural_meronomy_and_taxonomy_of_semiosis_Emon_between_index_and_symbol>10.12697/SSS.2019.47.1-2.03
  20. Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., Bergman, A., 1975. The psychological birth of the human infant. Symbiosis and individuation. New York: Basic Booka, Inc., Publishers.
  21. Maran, T. et al., 2016. Animal umwelten in a changing world. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, available at: 10.26530/OAPEN_620672
  22. Martinelli, D., 2010. A critical companion to zoosemiotics: People, paths, ideas. Dordrecht: Springer, available at: ,
  23. Mithen, S., 2005. The singing Neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind, and body. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, available at:
  24. Morris, C., 1955 [1946]. Signs, Language, and Behavior. New York: George Braziller.
  25. Olay, C., 2020. Self-interpreting Language Animal: Charles Taylor’s Anthropology. In: Kulcsár-Szabó Z., Lénárt T., Simon A., Végső R. (Eds.), Life After Literature. Numanities—Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 12. Cham, Springer, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33738-4_9>
  26. Peirce, C. S., 2000 [1965-1967]. Izbrannyye filosofskiye proizvedeniya. Per. s angl. K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze, T. Dmitriyeva. Moskwa: Logos. (In Russian). Trans. from Peirce C. S. Collected Papers. Ed. by C. Hart-shorne and P. Weiss; Arthur W. Burks. Vol. 1—8. Cambridge—Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965—1967, available at:
  27. Reznikova, Z., 2017. Studying Animal Language Without Translation: An Insight From Ants. Switzerland: Edition First Publisher: Springer International Publishing, available at: 10.1007/978-3-319-44918-0
  28. Savage-Rumbaugh, S.. Rumbaugh, D., Fields, W., 2009. Empirical kanzi: The ape language controversy revisited, Skeptic. 15(1), 25—33.
  29. Sebeok, T. A., 1990. Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto: Victoria College in the University of Toronto.
  30. Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney., D. L., 2018. Edited by Michael L. Platt. The Social Origins of Language, Princeton: Princeton University Press. x—167, available at: <https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888146-003>
  31. Shabanov, P. D., Lebedev A. A., 2007. Zoosotsial’noye povedeniye krys. [Zoosocial behavior of rats]. Obzory po klinicheskoy farmakologii i lekarstvennoy terapii. [Reviews of clinical pharmacology and drug therapy]. 5(3), 2—79, available at:
  32. Taylor, C., 2016. The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity .Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, available at:
  33. Wendler, H., 2020. Philosophical Primatology: Reflections on Theses of Anthropological Difference, the Logic of Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial, and the Self-other Category Mistake Within the Scope of Cognitive Primate Research. Biological Theory 15, 61—82.10.1007/s13752-019-00337-3
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 9
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2021
Published on: Jun 30, 2021
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2021 Irina B. Ptitsyna, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.